4 réponses à ce sujet

[KaitoXIII]

Hey

 

Which character do you think makes more sense? A Templar who becames inquisitor or a mage?

[Mykel54]

A mage, because the mark is a magical thing, and you use it like as if it was a spell. Templars are resistant to magic, so maybe the mark would not stick on them. I find easier to justify the PC doing all kind of wonderful things with his green hand if he knows how magic works already.

[Fiery Knight]

A mage, because the mark is a magical thing, and you use it like as if it was a spell. Templars are resistant to magic, so maybe the mark would not stick on them. I find easier to justify the PC doing all kind of wonderful things with his green hand if he knows how magic works already.

 

It could also be seen kinda poetic to have a Templar who wields magic of sorts, and experiencing first hand the benefits and cautions with wielding it. Personally I find it more interesting to play a character who doesn't know what has happened to him and gradually learns to deal with it. But being a mage and controlling it is cool as well.

[LegNCain]

You could say that because templars are resistant to magic, that is why you didn't die from it but instead can live with it. Someone with less resistance might have just died. But yeah using a magical seeming thing also works for mage, but at least you can justify it for both

[KaitoXIII]

so who would be more powerful?