Help me out with something here....
If you know that the people typing "crap is broken FIX IT!!" is hyperbole, why even bother mentioning the fact that M&K is not broken? Isn't it obvious these people know the scheme isn't literally broken? Isn't the exaggeration the point of the complaint, that they want a better scheme, not a fixed scheme?
I just don't get why you (or anyone) needs to weigh in on somebody else's problem ... why do you respond if you 'get tired' of seeing it?
That's like keeping Jerry Springer on even when you can't stand the people he has on as guests.
Well, for one, I was asked my intention about why I posted to begin with. Two, this is a discussion forum, I though we were supposed to discuss things here. Three, while some people are using it as "hyperbole" to get fixes, they mostly don't post WHAT to fix to make it better, AND to some, it really is broken in their mind and the only way they think it works is with a controller. Four, well, when reading the forum and you come across posts talking about the game, and you want to discuss it, and the next post is another "M&K is BROKEN!!!" then you get a good post then another "BROKE CRAP!!" post it does get tiring. Five, I weighed in on peoples problems cause I was asked, and offered an opinion of both those problems and why I was posting to begin with. Six, I NEVER watch Springer even the commercials for it make me cringe. Seven, and why SHOULDN'T I offer a response to someone's OPINION on a board about people's OPINION of the game?? Eight, why are you confronting me, in direct contradiction to the ideas about posting that you JUST POSTED??




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





