28 réponses à ce sujet

[SykoWolfPup]

The eye can distinguish past 300 fps for most people. 60fps for games is better in every conceivable way, and anyone who tells you different is lying to you.

Actually, this is wrong. FPS is very much a game mechanic as much as it is visual. The more frames, the faster and more responsive things will feel. This makes a great deal of sense in fast paced games like shooters and whatnot. In a game like Dragon Age, you dont need 60 fps. 30 works just as well because the game doesnt require lightning quick actions and camera movements.

[Degenerate Rakia Time]

Because it's about what you are used to. If you are used to 30fps, then you won't care. However, if you have played games in 60fps for a long time, the drop to 30fps is very noticeable. And jarring.

ive played in 30fps for so long that 60 just looks wrong to me, too damn fast

[StingingVelvet]

The vast majority do not think 30fps is that bad, even among PC gamers. It's just a loud group who demand higher and let everyone know it.

 

I do prefer 60fps of course, especially in first-person games, but overall a steady framerate around 30 is the most important baseline. I would actually prefer a steady 30fps to a lot of fluctuation above that, which feels much worse.

[Natureguy85]

The vast majority do not think 30fps is that bad, even among PC gamers. It's just a loud group who demand higher and let everyone know it.

 

I do prefer 60fps of course, especially in first-person games, but overall a steady framerate around 30 is the most important baseline. I would actually prefer a steady 30fps to a lot of fluctuation above that, which feels much worse.

 

True, but there is no reason a game on PC shouldn't be able to do at least 60.