Aller au contenu

Photo

Shepard Vs Master Chief


238 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Haasth

Haasth
  • Members
  • 4 412 messages

Marlina wrote...

SCREW YOU GUYS! The imperial guard are the most badass mo-fos in 40k, simply because even though they fight against god-like beings and inhuman monsters, they still HOLD THE LINE.
Captain Kirrahe would be proud... :')


Captain Kirrahe would be quite dead too. 
But alright, Imperial Guard are quite awesome... I would think twice before I'd join them... but alright. 

#77
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

KainrycKarr wrote...

Halo is an atrocious excuse for a sci-fi story. And any shooter that allows you to bunny hop your way to victory cannot be taken seriously.


  • Halo´s story is actually quite good, at least that what you know from the games. Don´t know the books though.
  • You can´t "bunny-hop to victory". On Legendary, you die before you hit ground again. You need to proceed slowly and intelligent, and you need to shoot like hell, because Elite´s are practically immortal without PlasmaGun Overload + Headshot.


#78
jsachun

jsachun
  • Members
  • 1 335 messages

Marlina wrote...

SCREW YOU GUYS! The imperial guard are the most badass mo-fos in 40k, simply because even though they fight against god-like beings and inhuman monsters, they still HOLD THE LINE.
Captain Kirrahe would be proud... :')

What? Fighting for the false emperor? The Alpha Legion stampedes all over the imperial guards. Anything worthwhile in their army is their artillery.

Modifié par jsachun, 25 janvier 2010 - 02:07 .


#79
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

KainrycKarr wrote...


He'll bunny hop his way into a singularity, because Halo sucks, and MC is a punk.


I shall leave you in the darkness of your stupidity. Go play Counter-strike if you are unable to play a good shooter like Halo.

#80
reven_530

reven_530
  • Members
  • 3 messages
Sorry, but the Master Chief would win. He's bigger, stronger, and is genetically engineered to be the perfect soldier. He can take more punishment than Shepard. Shepard is awesome, and is a waaaaaaay more interesting character, but the Chief is too powerful.

#81
RavenholmeCP42

RavenholmeCP42
  • Members
  • 373 messages
Actually, Halo's story is really bad. It was good in the first game, but then it began developing more plot holes and inconsistencies than a swiss cheese. I liked the overall premise, but the execution was... ugh. And it was incredibly unoriginal as well (Asides from the Flood, and even then, they were pretty much The Beast from Homeworld: Cataclysm mated with the thing in System Shock 2).

#82
Marlina

Marlina
  • Members
  • 443 messages

Tirigon wrote...

But the Masterchief is special, he is so faceless and helmeted that his facelessness IS an identity in itself.........

Besides, the guys in Warhammer 40K are too dumb to shoot their opponents in the head. Masterchief isnt. He´ll just HEADSHOT!!!!!! everyone, while he himself is immune due to his energy shields.

ACTUALLY, 40k has a fluff reason for the lack of helmets on commanders :P They also have a kind of energy shield. 
And with the weapons the space marines carry, they don't NEED to score headshots. One hit ANYWHERE and you're dead. The bolters they use are more like miniature grenade launchers, every shot explodes on impact.

#83
KainrycKarr

KainrycKarr
  • Members
  • 4 819 messages

Tirigon wrote...

KainrycKarr wrote...

Halo is an atrocious excuse for a sci-fi story. And any shooter that allows you to bunny hop your way to victory cannot be taken seriously.


  • Halo´s story is actually quite good, at least that what you know from the games. Don´t know the books though.
  • You can´t "bunny-hop to victory". On Legendary, you die before you hit ground again. You need to proceed slowly and intelligent, and you need to shoot like hell, because Elite´s are practically immortal without PlasmaGun Overload + Headshot.

[*]No, Halo's story is awful for a sci-fi. For a fantasy or a shooter game? Sure. I guess its okay.
[*]I couldn't stomach the halo games long enough to bother with legendary. Everything is ridiculously overdone.
[*]tiny little git aliens running around sounding like some cheesy villain from a cartoon? gimme a break.
[*]Any armor that can survive atmospheric re-entry and still be combat fit wouldn't be penetrable or stoppable by anything less than a nuke. Retarded.
[*]Halo sucks, and MC is a punk.

#84
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

jsachun wrote...

Marlina wrote...

SCREW YOU GUYS! The imperial guard are the most badass mo-fos in 40k, simply because even though they fight against god-like beings and inhuman monsters, they still HOLD THE LINE.
Captain Kirrahe would be proud... :')

What? Fighting for the false emperor? The Alpha Legion stampedes all over the imperial guards. Anything worthwhile in their army is their artillery.



I played Dawn of War once.  The game sucks, and the Imperial Guard sucks especially hard. The AI is so ****ing bad that you have to Micro-manage them all the time or they will stand in each others way..............

#85
KainrycKarr

KainrycKarr
  • Members
  • 4 819 messages

Tirigon wrote...

KainrycKarr wrote...


He'll bunny hop his way into a singularity, because Halo sucks, and MC is a punk.


I shall leave you in the darkness of your stupidity. Go play Counter-strike if you are unable to play a good shooter like Halo.


Counter strike equally sucks. Crysis and Modern Warfare are much more believable, and realistic. Good stories to boot.

#86
jsachun

jsachun
  • Members
  • 1 335 messages

KainrycKarr wrote...

Tirigon wrote...

KainrycKarr wrote...


He'll bunny hop his way into a singularity, because Halo sucks, and MC is a punk.


I shall leave you in the darkness of your stupidity. Go play Counter-strike if you are unable to play a good shooter like Halo.


Counter strike equally sucks. Crysis and Modern Warfare are much more believable, and realistic. Good stories to boot.



Best shooter ever is still Soldiers of Fortune 2.

Modifié par jsachun, 25 janvier 2010 - 02:10 .


#87
Marlina

Marlina
  • Members
  • 443 messages

jsachun wrote...

Marlina wrote...

SCREW YOU GUYS! The imperial guard are the most badass mo-fos in 40k, simply because even though they fight against god-like beings and inhuman monsters, they still HOLD THE LINE.
Captain Kirrahe would be proud... :')

What? Fighting for the false emperor? The Alpha Legion stampedes all over the imperial guards. Anything worthwhile in their army is their artillery.

You should totally read the book "Legion", it casts a whole new light on Alpha Legion. ;) And yes, they are awesome.

Some really cool IG fluff in that book too. In fact, most of the main characters are IG soldiers. 

#88
jsachun

jsachun
  • Members
  • 1 335 messages

Marlina wrote...

jsachun wrote...

Marlina wrote...

SCREW YOU GUYS! The imperial guard are the most badass mo-fos in 40k, simply because even though they fight against god-like beings and inhuman monsters, they still HOLD THE LINE.
Captain Kirrahe would be proud... :')

What? Fighting for the false emperor? The Alpha Legion stampedes all over the imperial guards. Anything worthwhile in their army is their artillery.

You should totally read the book "Legion", it casts a whole new light on Alpha Legion. ;) And yes, they are awesome.

Some really cool IG fluff in that book too. In fact, most of the main characters are IG soldiers. 

That just proves IG sucks.

#89
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

KainrycKarr wrote...

[*]No, Halo's story is awful for a sci-fi. For a fantasy or a shooter game? Sure. I guess its okay.
[*]I couldn't stomach the halo games long enough to bother with legendary. Everything is ridiculously overdone.
[*]tiny little git aliens running around sounding like some cheesy villain from a cartoon? gimme a break.
[*]Any armor that can survive atmospheric re-entry and still be combat fit wouldn't be penetrable or stoppable by anything less than a nuke. Retarded.
[*]Halo sucks, and MC is a punk.

[*]

[*]
[*]
[*] Lolz , Halo is not reality, so why would I care that it´s not really realistic? It does not need to be. It´s funny, good graphics, challenging, acceptable story. More than I can tell from most shooters I know.

#90
RavenholmeCP42

RavenholmeCP42
  • Members
  • 373 messages
Well, that's the point then, put them on an equal footing (And the sensible way is to tone down Master Chief's to the less ridiculous ME universe) and Shepard would win.

#91
Marlina

Marlina
  • Members
  • 443 messages

jsachun wrote...

That just proves IG sucks.

What are you talking about? Have you even read it?

#92
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

KainrycKarr wrote...

Counter strike equally sucks. Crysis and Modern Warfare are much more believable, and realistic. Good stories to boot.


Crysis is cool in the beginning, but when you have to fight the aliens it´s boring........... And the story comes nowhere close to Halo.

Modern Warfare is probably the most realistic shooter, but.... boring as hell :(:(:(:(

#93
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

RavenholmeCP42 wrote...

Well, that's the point then, put them on an equal footing (And the sensible way is to tone down Master Chief's to the less ridiculous ME universe) and Shepard would win.


Without his armor Master Chief is still the better Marksman and more experienced in Warfare, especially in fighting without party.

#94
RickmanUK

RickmanUK
  • Members
  • 109 messages

Marlina wrote...

Tirigon wrote...

But the Masterchief is special, he is so faceless and helmeted that his facelessness IS an identity in itself.........

Besides, the guys in Warhammer 40K are too dumb to shoot their opponents in the head. Masterchief isnt. He´ll just HEADSHOT!!!!!! everyone, while he himself is immune due to his energy shields.

ACTUALLY, 40k has a fluff reason for the lack of helmets on commanders :P They also have a kind of energy shield. 
And with the weapons the space marines carry, they don't NEED to score headshots. One hit ANYWHERE and you're dead. The bolters they use are more like miniature grenade launchers, every shot explodes on impact.


Heh yep. Hell let's go All out if you REALLY want the Sillyness of 3 way Combat...

Vanguard Shepard Vs Master Chief Vs a Space Marine Terminator (Either the Cyclone Missle Launcher or Assault cannon)

...... Who would Survive?

#95
KainrycKarr

KainrycKarr
  • Members
  • 4 819 messages

Tirigon wrote...

KainrycKarr wrote...

[*]No, Halo's story is awful for a sci-fi. For a fantasy or a shooter game? Sure. I guess its okay.
[*]I couldn't stomach the halo games long enough to bother with legendary. Everything is ridiculously overdone.
[*]tiny little git aliens running around sounding like some cheesy villain from a cartoon? gimme a break.
[*]Any armor that can survive atmospheric re-entry and still be combat fit wouldn't be penetrable or stoppable by anything less than a nuke. Retarded.
[*]Halo sucks, and MC is a punk.

[*]

[*]
[*]
[*] Lolz , Halo is not reality, so why would I care that it´s not really realistic? It does not need to be. It´s funny, good graphics, challenging, acceptable story. More than I can tell from most shooters I know.

[*]Because shooters suck in general. I can only name one or two truly acceptable ones.
[*]And to me, a good sci fi story needs at least SOME believability. There is none in Halo.
[*]Halo sucks, and MC is still a punk.

#96
KainrycKarr

KainrycKarr
  • Members
  • 4 819 messages

Tirigon wrote...

KainrycKarr wrote...

Counter strike equally sucks. Crysis and Modern Warfare are much more believable, and realistic. Good stories to boot.


Crysis is cool in the beginning, but when you have to fight the aliens it´s boring........... And the story comes nowhere close to Halo.

Modern Warfare is probably the most realistic shooter, but.... boring as hell :(:(:(:(


...I can't take you seriously now. Sorry. Halo isn't even remotely close to Crysis or MW.

MW takes far, far more skill than Halo by the way. I played Halo multiplayer, and it was just silly.

#97
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

RickmanUK wrote...


Heh yep. Hell let's go All out if you REALLY want the Sillyness of 3 way Combat...

Vanguard Shepard Vs Master Chief Vs a Space Marine Terminator (Either the Cyclone Missle Launcher or Assault cannon)

...... Who would Survive?


I demand Tungdil to take part in the fun then. He would cut their heads off and drink on his victory out of their skulls.

#98
Keltoris

Keltoris
  • Members
  • 1 526 messages

KainrycKarr wrote...

[*]Because shooters suck in general. I can only name one or two truly acceptable ones.
[*]And to me, a good sci fi story needs at least SOME believability. There is none in Halo.
[*]Halo sucks, and MC is still a punk.


I'll give Halo this, it has the most credible excuse for non-aggressive AIs (vs say ME's system) I've ever seen.

#99
Haasth

Haasth
  • Members
  • 4 412 messages
Bad Company 2 is more realistic than Modern Warfare. There, I said it.

RickmanUK wrote...

Marlina wrote...

Tirigon wrote...

But the Masterchief is special, he is so faceless and helmeted that his facelessness IS an identity in itself.........

Besides, the guys in Warhammer 40K are too dumb to shoot their opponents in the head. Masterchief isnt. He´ll just HEADSHOT!!!!!! everyone, while he himself is immune due to his energy shields.

ACTUALLY, 40k has a fluff reason for the lack of helmets on commanders :P They also have a kind of energy shield. 
And with the weapons the space marines carry, they don't NEED to score headshots. One hit ANYWHERE and you're dead. The bolters they use are more like miniature grenade launchers, every shot explodes on impact.


Heh yep. Hell let's go All out if you REALLY want the Sillyness of 3 way Combat...

Vanguard Shepard Vs Master Chief Vs a Space Marine Terminator (Either the Cyclone Missle Launcher or Assault cannon)

...... Who would Survive?


Terminator. Definitely. 
Vanguard is nice and all but he wouldn't even come against those weaponry, and biotics isn't very useful from range. (Fine, he could charge... but charging right into a cyclone missle launcher storm? Ouch) 

Master Chief... well... give him a Spartan Laser and he might stand a chance for a while... Don't think he'll get that far though. 

#100
Skalman91

Skalman91
  • Members
  • 220 messages

RickmanUK wrote...

Marlina wrote...

Tirigon wrote...

But the Masterchief is special, he is so faceless and helmeted that his facelessness IS an identity in itself.........

Besides, the guys in Warhammer 40K are too dumb to shoot their opponents in the head. Masterchief isnt. He´ll just HEADSHOT!!!!!! everyone, while he himself is immune due to his energy shields.

ACTUALLY, 40k has a fluff reason for the lack of helmets on commanders :P They also have a kind of energy shield. 
And with the weapons the space marines carry, they don't NEED to score headshots. One hit ANYWHERE and you're dead. The bolters they use are more like miniature grenade launchers, every shot explodes on impact.


Heh yep. Hell let's go All out if you REALLY want the Sillyness of 3 way Combat...

Vanguard Shepard Vs Master Chief Vs a Space Marine Terminator (Either the Cyclone Missle Launcher or Assault cannon)

...... Who would Survive?

The Space Marine Terminator obviously...

Almost nothing can take them out short of a nuke, and I'm not even sure that is enough.