Ce sujet est fermé
KainrycKarr wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
KainrycKarr wrote...
Page six; Halo sucks, and MC is still a punk.
I knew I would find a use for this picture:P:P:P:P:P:P
....Angry emo guy?
MC just got downgraded from douche to punk-b*tch.
crewos wrote...
Zoe Dedweth wrote...
Azazel005 wrote...
Skalman91 wrote...
Azazel005 wrote...
From a fluff perspective?
Chief over a single rank and file Space Marines and Shephard, even a biotic Shephard.
Over higher end 40k characters? It's hard to say.
You forget that each Space Marine is equal to an army of ordinary soldiers.
Space Marines are just ridiculously overpowered.
Gordon Freeman would still win.
I am not going to dignify the Freeman comment, I have never understood what the attraction was with that guy....
Nonetheless Space Marines are ridiculous foes to be sure, their genetic engineering equipment and resolve make them incredibly lethal. They are at heart a fighting force however, your rank and file while highly flexible in a stand up fight simply can't match the near limitless flexibility, tactics, battle intuition and covert capabilities of MC, plus he is really lucky.
If you compare a Spartan and a marine (neither with the benefit of plot armor) then the marine wins. If you compare a spartan vs marine and the marine is favoured by the author then the marine wins. Same goes if the spartan is favoured by the writer.
So purely talking from a "technical" point of view the marine pwns the spartan.
Oh - and if you want to use the Dark crusade video as proof of marines being sucky. The Necrons are marines taken up to eleven. They havn't even started using any WAR equipment and have wiped out almost everything else in the galaxy at one time or another. Their "god" put the fear of death into every single living organism in the galaxy so yeah. Dying when fighting them is sort of expected.
Was talking about where they were aiming. And eldar > necrons in 40k lore.
blank1 wrote...
From a purely "combat" point of view where hand to hand isn't allowed, the Chief would win because he has access to particle based weapon technology, and ME shields cannot block energy based weapons in canon. If hand to hand distance were allowed, Shep might have the advantage with biotics... but Shep is still an ordinary man. The Chief KO's brutes in hand to hand... and they weight half a metric ton. Chief would splatter Shep all over the place, but it's not like its a fair fight. Shep is like a really, really peak human being, whereas Chief has been made into a living weapon since age six.
KainrycKarr wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
KainrycKarr wrote...
Page six; Halo sucks, and MC is still a punk.
I knew I would find a use for this picture:P:P:P:P:P:P
....Angry emo guy?
MC just got downgraded from douche to punk-b*tch.
:P:P:P:P:P:P:P:P:P:P:P:P
soulbane1118 wrote...
In ME universe Master Chief is the equivalent of Conrad Verner
Marlina wrote...
Me said no hand-to-hand, so that makes them about equal. From a fluff perspective, then yes, those Spartans are supposedly god-like, like in that one Halo Wars cut-scene I saw on youtube, but from what we see of Master Chief in-game, I'd say they're about equal.
Now, if you wanna REALLY up the ante, you pit them both against a single WH40k space marine. ^^
blank1 wrote...
Gordon Freeman would still kick everyone's ass. With a crowbar. And he won't even have to take off his glasses.
crewos wrote...
Zoe Dedweth wrote...
Azazel005 wrote...
Skalman91 wrote...
Azazel005 wrote...
From a fluff perspective?
Chief over a single rank and file Space Marines and Shephard, even a biotic Shephard.
Over higher end 40k characters? It's hard to say.
You forget that each Space Marine is equal to an army of ordinary soldiers.
Space Marines are just ridiculously overpowered.
Gordon Freeman would still win.
I am not going to dignify the Freeman comment, I have never understood what the attraction was with that guy....
Nonetheless Space Marines are ridiculous foes to be sure, their genetic engineering equipment and resolve make them incredibly lethal. They are at heart a fighting force however, your rank and file while highly flexible in a stand up fight simply can't match the near limitless flexibility, tactics, battle intuition and covert capabilities of MC, plus he is really lucky.
If you compare a Spartan and a marine (neither with the benefit of plot armor) then the marine wins. If you compare a spartan vs marine and the marine is favoured by the author then the marine wins. Same goes if the spartan is favoured by the writer.
So purely talking from a "technical" point of view the marine pwns the spartan.
Oh - and if you want to use the Dark crusade video as proof of marines being sucky. The Necrons are marines taken up to eleven. They havn't even started using any WAR equipment and have wiped out almost everything else in the galaxy at one time or another. Their "god" put the fear of death into every single living organism in the galaxy so yeah. Dying when fighting them is sort of expected.
Was talking about where they were aiming. And eldar > necrons in 40k lore.
Zoe Dedweth wrote...
crewos wrote...
Zoe Dedweth wrote...
Azazel005 wrote...
Skalman91 wrote...
Azazel005 wrote...
From a fluff perspective?
Chief over a single rank and file Space Marines and Shephard, even a biotic Shephard.
Over higher end 40k characters? It's hard to say.
You forget that each Space Marine is equal to an army of ordinary soldiers.
Space Marines are just ridiculously overpowered.
Gordon Freeman would still win.
I am not going to dignify the Freeman comment, I have never understood what the attraction was with that guy....
Nonetheless Space Marines are ridiculous foes to be sure, their genetic engineering equipment and resolve make them incredibly lethal. They are at heart a fighting force however, your rank and file while highly flexible in a stand up fight simply can't match the near limitless flexibility, tactics, battle intuition and covert capabilities of MC, plus he is really lucky.
If you compare a Spartan and a marine (neither with the benefit of plot armor) then the marine wins. If you compare a spartan vs marine and the marine is favoured by the author then the marine wins. Same goes if the spartan is favoured by the writer.
So purely talking from a "technical" point of view the marine pwns the spartan.
Oh - and if you want to use the Dark crusade video as proof of marines being sucky. The Necrons are marines taken up to eleven. They havn't even started using any WAR equipment and have wiped out almost everything else in the galaxy at one time or another. Their "god" put the fear of death into every single living organism in the galaxy so yeah. Dying when fighting them is sort of expected.
Was talking about where they were aiming. And eldar > necrons in 40k lore.
The eldar had Millenia to kill the Necrons and still havn't done it. Then they all jerked off enough to create a new god that wants to devour their souls. So yeah - wouldn't say they own the necrons. infact the opposite since they are dying as a species now.
Tirigon wrote...
blank1 wrote...
Gordon Freeman would still kick everyone's ass. With a crowbar. And he won't even have to take off his glasses.
Not Chuck Norris.
Not liking something and hating something are 2 entirely different words.Aradace wrote...
Kyero wrote...
Seriously, who would win?
fair fight (equal armor/ weapons and no hand to hand combat)
so damn booooored!
Shepard because I hate Halo lol. Yes, I said it...I hate Halo. Not saying its a bad game (because its not) I just personally do not like it.
KainrycKarr wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
blank1 wrote...
Gordon Freeman would still kick everyone's ass. With a crowbar. And he won't even have to take off his glasses.
Not Chuck Norris.
Chuck Norris is the single most over-rated lame meme, ever. Pedobear was funnier.
Haasth wrote...
Zoe Dedweth wrote...
crewos wrote...
Zoe Dedweth wrote...
Azazel005 wrote...
Skalman91 wrote...
Azazel005 wrote...
From a fluff perspective?
Chief over a single rank and file Space Marines and Shephard, even a biotic Shephard.
Over higher end 40k characters? It's hard to say.
You forget that each Space Marine is equal to an army of ordinary soldiers.
Space Marines are just ridiculously overpowered.
Gordon Freeman would still win.
I am not going to dignify the Freeman comment, I have never understood what the attraction was with that guy....
Nonetheless Space Marines are ridiculous foes to be sure, their genetic engineering equipment and resolve make them incredibly lethal. They are at heart a fighting force however, your rank and file while highly flexible in a stand up fight simply can't match the near limitless flexibility, tactics, battle intuition and covert capabilities of MC, plus he is really lucky.
If you compare a Spartan and a marine (neither with the benefit of plot armor) then the marine wins. If you compare a spartan vs marine and the marine is favoured by the author then the marine wins. Same goes if the spartan is favoured by the writer.
So purely talking from a "technical" point of view the marine pwns the spartan.
Oh - and if you want to use the Dark crusade video as proof of marines being sucky. The Necrons are marines taken up to eleven. They havn't even started using any WAR equipment and have wiped out almost everything else in the galaxy at one time or another. Their "god" put the fear of death into every single living organism in the galaxy so yeah. Dying when fighting them is sort of expected.
Was talking about where they were aiming. And eldar > necrons in 40k lore.
The eldar had Millenia to kill the Necrons and still havn't done it. Then they all jerked off enough to create a new god that wants to devour their souls. So yeah - wouldn't say they own the necrons. infact the opposite since they are dying as a species now.
That's one way to put it. Haha.
jsachun wrote...
Gee, MC don't look too tough now.
jsachun wrote...
Gee, MC don't look too tough now.
Modifié par Haasth, 25 janvier 2010 - 03:34 .
I've seen the movie. But if you've played the game a well placed sticky grenade and MC's a goner.Haasth wrote...
jsachun wrote...
Gee, MC don't look too tough now.
You do realize that is a regular human marine, right?
This is more like it:
Modifié par TheRealIncarnal, 25 janvier 2010 - 03:37 .
Zoe Dedweth wrote...
Azazel005 wrote...
Skalman91 wrote...
Azazel005 wrote...
From a fluff perspective?
Chief over a single rank and file Space Marines and Shephard, even a biotic Shephard.
Over higher end 40k characters? It's hard to say.
You forget that each Space Marine is equal to an army of ordinary soldiers.
Space Marines are just ridiculously overpowered.
Gordon Freeman would still win.
I am not going to dignify the Freeman comment, I have never understood what the attraction was with that guy....
Nonetheless Space Marines are ridiculous foes to be sure, their genetic engineering equipment and resolve make them incredibly lethal. They are at heart a fighting force however, your rank and file while highly flexible in a stand up fight simply can't match the near limitless flexibility, tactics, battle intuition and covert capabilities of MC, plus he is really lucky.
If you compare a Spartan and a marine (neither with the benefit of plot armor) then the marine wins. If you compare a spartan vs marine and the marine is favoured by the author then the marine wins. Same goes if the spartan is favoured by the writer.
So purely talking from a "technical" point of view the marine pwns the spartan.
Oh - and if you want to use the Dark crusade video as proof of marines being sucky. The Necrons are marines taken up to eleven. They havn't even started using any WAR equipment and have wiped out almost everything else in the galaxy at one time or another. Their "god" put the fear of death into every single living organism in the galaxy so yeah. Dying when fighting them is sort of expected.
jsachun wrote...
I've seen the movie. But if you've played the game a well placed sticky grenade and MC's a goner.
Retour en haut
