81 réponses à ce sujet

[Gel214th]

ad. Gel214th.

 

Agreed.

Though I will defend The Witcher 2 - sure, the combat focus became more actionish (actually the first game was like that too, to an extent), but the quality of writing, the truly branching story that truly affects your game experience and attention to detail are the main selling points. Hard to not call TW2 an RPG.

Loved the Witcher series, I would never argue that they are not absolutely beautiful RPGs. But they are single character, action combat RPGs.

That' was my comparison and reference to them, not that there was anything wrong with that series as an RPG  

Looking forward to Witcher 3 , definitely!! I was quite disappointed when it was delayed. That company has a completely different relationship with its players than the Bioware-EA partnership. 

 

There are no Party AIs or tactics to consider with Witcher. 

You have one character for the player to control, and it is all Action. 

It's a simpler design, and easier and cheaper to build for.

 

Perhaps we need another iteration for Bioware to get these systems coded and fixed for DA:I. Or they could just leave it as is, and move things even further away from tactical combat RPG to just total Action. 

[Dragon Age1103]

Of what the hell are you talking about? Where's the correlation I cannot either fathom to understand.

lol how can anyone take you serious when you just typed "fathom to understand". People such as yourself are far too common on the internet. It's rather annoying, the false sense of superiority and what not. You'd have to be complete fool to think the controls and combat are an improvement over the PC versions of origins or II. Clunky awkward controls, a rather dull looking UI, basically a complete lack of tactics. It takes the series from being the spiritual successor of a legendary franchise to a well written and acted action RPG/hack n slash with no mechanical depth to speak of. This is one of those I'm gonna say something moments then ignore this thread because I can guarantee you that your response will not be worth my time. In the future why don't you try being a little more friendly with people instead of posting those junk responses, try acting like an adult. You know participating in a community, contributing, all that fun jazz. All though to be honest the more I read of this thread...well it just seems like a bunch of people who can and will complain about anything. Oh yeah...I'm on the internet. 

  my synopsis of the game...combat sucks beyond belief and is an insult to the series. Everything else is brilliant and very enjoyable. I regret coming to the internet ....back to enjoy most aspects of the game. 

[Xionanx]

I personally disagree. I didn't like DAO. It was old school. I liked DA2, but my favorite fantasy RPG right now is Dragon's Dogma. I can't make a conclusion on DAI since I haven't finished it.
 

 

Dragons Dogma was nice.. I was hoping from the trailers of this game before it launched that I would be closer to Dragon's Dogma.. 

 

DA:I is a step in the right direction from DA2.. but it still fails in a lot of minor ways.

 

I dread the idea of "replaying" DA:I due to the "Search" feature... but I have played through Dragons Dogma a good 20+ times...

[N7 Spectre525]

Dragons Dogma was nice.. I was hoping from the trailers of this game before it launched that I would be closer to Dragon's Dogma.. 

 

DA:I is a step in the right direction from DA2.. but it still fails in a lot of minor ways.

 

I dread the idea of "replaying" DA:I due to the "Search" feature... but I have played through Dragons Dogma a good 20+ times....

Dragons Dogma deserves a sequel like yesterday.

[Greetsme]

If they made a updated version of Origins, I would buy it.  It would still be money better spent, than buying this thing they are trying to pass of as a Dragon age title.

[setrus86]

You know, if the games don't change, if they don't try new things, for better or worse, (generally for the better in this game, I feel) then wouldn't the DA series more or less become like COD? I...don't like the idea of that. 

[Shelled]

Yes, sure. Let's turn every next title of a franchise in an exact copy of the previous one with just some little enhancements. This is all we need for progress.

If science and art were to be lead by people like you (and 80% of those on this forum) we would still be cavemen engraving graffiti on stone while looking at the sun thinking it is a god.

I duno why people are upvoting this post. How is this iteration of dragon age innovative at all when nearly every aspect of the design itself is a complete downgrade compared to origins? The game looks better, that's about all the innovation that happened here. It's a complete downgrade compared to origins in terms of controls and battle-design. You can't even make your character hold position properly in this version. You must be joking me.