132 réponses à ce sujet

[Rainbow Wyvern]

Again with the p0rn! It´s like this forum is flooded with bible belt kids who think romantic intimacy equals public intercourse.

No, it rather seems like it's flooded with those who think bewbs = maturity. I might also add that I am atheist so your 'bible belt kids' thing? Yeah no. You also seem to be blowing things way out of proportion - since when did anyone here say anything along the lines of 'romantic intimacy equals public intercourse'? 

 

Cassandra's romance has boobs, anyway. You really, really want to see boobs? Romance her. Some people like Josie's romance the way it is.

[Uccio]

 

Which is why it's ambiguous  

 

 

Well for the next installment I hope, just for your sake, that all combat is also left our for head rp. So no one will have any emotional scars. 

[Uccio]

No, it rather seems like it's flooded with those who think bewbs = maturity. I might also add that I am atheist so your 'bible belt kids' thing? Yeah no. You also seem to be blowing things way out of proportion - since when did anyone here say anything along the lines of 'romantic intimacy equals public intercourse'? 

 

Cassandra's romance has boobs, anyway. You really, really want to see boobs? Romance her. Some people like Josie's romance the way it is.

 

 

Point missed. 

[Iakus]

And where did I say so? It because they do not. rp all you like in your head but don´t expect everyone to do so. If you fear portrayal of intimacy in mature game then that is your problem.

 

Right here:

That character should not have been included in the straight male romance group, since it is not one. She should have been the single option for disney hand holders, in a mature game.

 

 

Sex=/=Intimacy

Sex=/=Maturity

[AresKeith]

Well for the next installment I hope, just for your sake, that all combat is also left our for head rp. So no one will have any emotional scars. 

 

 

For my sake? lol

 

0/10 troll again 

[Uccio]

Right here:

 

Sex=/=Intimacy

Sex=/=Maturity

 

No. What it means is that a full romance includes intimacy, hand holding is not that.

[Rainbow Wyvern]

Point missed. 

Please elaborate. Typing two words is not very helpful.

[Iakus]

 

Cassandra's romance has boobs, anyway. You really, really want to see boobs? Romance her. Some people like Josie's romance the way it is.

Definitely romancing Josephing on my next inquisitor.  The more I hear about it, the more it sound slike I might like it even more than Cassandra's (which is by no means bad so far)

[Iakus]

No. What it means is that a full romance includes intimacy, hand holding is not that.

No, it's an expression of intimacy.  And can, in fact, be quite romantic.

[Uccio]

Please elaborate. Typing two words is not very helpful.

 

I do not count Josephine a romance, in the meaning of the word, since for me full romance includes physical intimacy. Shocking, I know.

[Uccio]

No, it's an expression of intimacy.  And can, in fact, be quite romantic.

 

I´m not denying personal preferences. I just see it that way, doesn´t mean I root for p0rn though.

[Iakus]

I do not count Josephine a romance, in the meaning of the word, since for me full romance includes physical intimacy. Shocking, I know.

You do not need physical intimacy to have a romance.  Physical intimacy is an expression of love and romance, but is not the embodiment of it.

[Iakus]

I´m not denying personal preferences. I just see it that way, doesn´t mean I root for p0rn though.

You are, however, denying that the Josephine romance is not a "true" romance due to lack of such intimacy.  That's more than simply a preference on your part.

[Miss This or That]

No. What it means is that a full romance includes intimacy, hand holding is not that.

I bet a few asexual couples can teach you a thing or two. There's nothing wrong with having preferences, but stating that you don't want to have her as an option because she doesn't fit your standard is very narrow-minded.

[Uccio]

You do not need physical intimacy to have a romance.  Physical intimacy is an expression of love and romance, but is not the embodiment of it.

 

For some yes, for me, yes and no. Not completely. Crudely put, I if would set out to find a new woman in my life, I would expect our romantic involvement to end in physical intimacy.

[Tyloric]

I don't agree about how Iron Bull's romance if being treated as a 'joke'. There is a difference between light-hearted and joke. The dude still woos with the best of them, in my opinion.

[Uccio]

You are, however, denying that the Josephine romance is not a "true" romance due to lack of such intimacy.  That's more than simply a preference on your part.

 

You are entitled to think so. I do not.

[Rainbow Wyvern]

I do not count Josephine a romance, in the meaning of the word, since for me full romance includes physical intimacy. Shocking, I know.

There could be physical intimacy in her romance, you just don't see it. Some people prefer it that way, and why shouldn't their preferences get acknowledged? 

[Uccio]

I bet a few asexual couples can teach you a thing or two. There's nothing wrong with having preferences, but stating that you don't want to have her as an option because she doesn't fit your standard is very narrow-minded.

 

Might be from a outside perspective. However, what matters to me is the only actual thing that matter. So to say, and not with ill meaning.

[Uccio]

There could be physical intimacy in her romance, you just don't see it. Some people prefer it that way, and why shouldn't their preferences get acknowledged? 

 

Well if there is a intimate fade to black moment which you can cut out with esc for those who do not want to see even that, Is someone left out in such case?

[Rainbow Wyvern]

Well if there is a intimate fade to black moment which you can cut out with esc for those who do not want to see even that, Is someone left out in such case?

A fade-to-black ala DA2 would honestly be my preferred way of doing things. With dialogue options beforehand (for romances where it makes sense, not one like Bull's for example) to say 'no I'd rather not do the dirty with you.'

 

That way, those who want physical intimacy can have it. Those who don't want it, don't have to. 

[ToxicNightshade]

Wait a second, neither Josie or Solas get actual sex scenes?

 

Wasn't Bioware's excuse for not making every romance bisexual this time around because it would take too much time to make cut scenes for all the different combinations or something like that? If they didn't even bother to put scenes in for some of them, then I think we kind of got screwed over, if that's true.

 

Or I'm wrong and misunderstood what that was about.

 

Either way, I'm gonna put myself on the side of 'either everyone gets one, or nobody does', as much as I dislike that.

[AresKeith]

Wait a second, neither Josie or Solas get actual sex scenes?

 

Wasn't Bioware's excuse for not making every romance bisexual this time around because it would take too much time to make cut scenes for all the different combinations or something like that? If they didn't even bother to put scenes in for some of them, then I think we kind of got screwed over, if that's true.

 

Or I'm wrong and misunderstood what that was about.

 

Either way, I'm gonna put myself on the side of 'either everyone gets one, or nobody does', as much as I dislike that.

 

No, Bioware never said that for going with set sexualities 

[helpthisguyplease]

Can you two time in this game like in DA:O?

[Rykoth]

Stop feeding the troll. Srsly.