it's got nothing to do with being right, or her agreeing with you.
the fact is from within the confines of society so much as is possible for anything to be objective, she is a bad person theirs no debate she murders people, she's rude, immature and blind.
If you read my earlier post about her not at all being a friend you'd see that trying to make out that i'm just sore that she didn't agree on my point of view is ridiculous, i romanced casandra despite the fate i was super pro mage and she went head to head with me on many issues.
You're trying to debate that societies norms are subjective, but for the person making statement based off of those norms they are making a straight statement. driving on the wrong side of the road is subjective, but if you live in a country where there are rules rules and norms for which side of the road you drive on then you can pull all the extensionalist arguments you want. but it doesn't matter in a reality based circumstance, pure think tank you have a point but not in the real world.
if you choose to drive on the side of the road that society has determined is the "wrong side of the road" then the person making the statement telling you, you're on the wrong side of the road is making an objective assessment. it's not subjective in that circumstance.
likewise pretending Sera clearly negatives traits are "just like, your opinion man" is nonsense.
time and time again people have pointed out her numerous flaws which you aren't even addressing.
you continually push the argument towards trying to make out that people are only happy with people that don't agree with them.
you're missing the entire point, the fact that sticks to her guns does not take away from the negative traits that she's murderer, an idiot, rude, arrogant and self centred. based on the norms and rules which society is governed by says she's a bad egg.
answer this honestly, If i were to respond to your argument as sera would that is to sneer at you insult you and take this ****** without even entertaining your argument instead dismiss it out of hand.
would you view me positively or negatively? the answer is of course negatively because i'm violating social norms i'm acting like a dick. If you then found out i'd murdered someone, would your position change or would you further view me in a negative light?
There's no need to answer everyone knows the answer, you would view me as a bad person. Now you can still like a bad person nobodies saying you can't like sera, very few people are saying she has zero redeeming qualities.
but the fact is objectively looking at her personality within the constraint of societal views on how a person should behave the simple fact is she's a bad person hell she's a borderline psychopath. It doesn't mean you can't like her character however. you can feel free join her fan club. shes still a deadshit.
That's a lot of text that doesn't change the definition of a term. Objective is true for everyone, to wit: We need air to breathe. This is objective, we need air to breathe. Murdering makes us bad people? Ok, out here, on this side of the monitor, sure, depending on the circumstance. If, for example, I am deployed, and the enemy is shooting at me, and I kill them, I am simply defending myself, and my country. Since every person in the Inquisition has killed people, including Josephine, then we should just uninstall, right? I mean, there's no way to play a good guy, because we kill people. That's the long form of "I'm not rewriting the English language so you can claim a subjective point is objective".
In the context of the game world, we can see her "murder" two people. One when we first meet her, who is trying to kill us, and one that we can tell her to go ahead and kill, after he kills an unarmed civilian. Which one of those murders would you have just as soon she not commit? The first one, so that you could murder him instead, or the second one, so that you could show her just how unimportant you find the "little people"? This is a sword and sorcery type fantasy game, we're all murderers, it's kind of the point, isn't it?
In what society? Polite society? In my clique, she behaves just like everyone else. We don't hold our pinky fingers out when we drink our beer either, I guess that means we're bad people too? So anyone that doesn't conform to your ideal is a bad person, and that's an
objective fact? I'd say, since it's based on the feelings of those that share your opinion that it's rather a
subjective fact. It would seem that Merriam-Webster agrees with me.