154 réponses à ce sujet

[CreepingShadow]

It's not harassment, just harmless flirting, she enjoys it, and even asks you out if you keep it up. I don't see why flirting with Harding is any different than hooking up with Josephine, or Cullen, or any of the companions and advisors. They're all your subortinates, don't see why Harding is a special case.

[King Dragonlord]

Slightly off-topic, but if you're ever watched any of SFDebris' Trek reviews, he covered that episode and completely eviscerated it, especially because by the end of the episode, the people refusing to leave because they've become so indoctrinated means that the bad guy basically "won".

 

 

I think that only males are able to flirt with Harding.

 

I never really saw all that much harm in the flirting, at least not in the early parts of the game because at that point you're just as much a common agent of the Inquisition as she is, with only your glowing hand giving you importance within the group.

 

I suppose it becomes a little bit more iffy after you become the Inquisitior, but if we're talking about abuses of power when it comes to our subordinates, what we can do to get Blackwall off the hook in his personal quest actually seems like it's a bigger offender than our office flirting with Harding.

I've seen the review. I love SFDebris and have for years. Even support his Patreon. And I agree with his assessment of the episode. He and I seem to bristle equally at the strange luddite messages that sometimes crop up in Trek.

[DeusGoddess5010]

Maybe flirting is only an option for male inquisitors? Both mine have been male so far and I've been in romances with others (though I can't remember if I was able to flirt with Harding after the "confirmation" of the romance) I'll check on that this playthrough.

I dont think so since I have seen screenshots of female inquisitors having that option, maybe female dwarf or human or something then again I hear how ppl are getting that option regardless of race, I must have a bug or something.

[Jester]

The fiendishly tricky part is separating 'consent' from 'lack of coercion.' Can someone truly give consent in the presence of a coercive factor?

Every seduction involves a degree of coercion. According to that logic, every time a man seduces a woman (or vice versa), that person is not giving their consent - therefore all sex is rape in fact. 

Do we really want to follow that road?