In the book Michel concedes to Gaspard because he was honor-bound to do, knowing that it would prolong a conflict that would kill thousands of people, most of whom honestly have no stake in either claimant's victory. In many respects, this could be considered a conventionally immoral decision, and yet "honorable" according to the standards of the code he lives by.
Well, it could be, at least by one whose own understanding of "honor" stands in opposition to the Chevaliers'. And so I will, pointless as it may be.
You're catching on.
And that's fair enough, so long as we can agree that what is and isn't honorable in a broad sense, outside the scope of a particular honor code, can't be stated objectively.
Now, I'd like to give this a rest. Standing up for the chevaliers, even indirectly, is making me sick to my stomach. Though I doubt the holiday over-eating helped much on that front.





Retour en haut









