118 réponses à ce sujet

[Lebanese Dude]

The next game is very likely to take place north of the Inquisition's power base. I would love to have a game centered in Tevinter

[Draining Dragon]

MAKER NOOOOO

[Antergaton]

I like Dragon Age in the idea that you have a shared world but differing heroes. I makes sense too as this is meant to be the Dragon AGE not just the Dragon A Few Years in the middle of an Age.

 

... so no. I don't want Inquisitor to be anymore involved than this one.

[exboomer]

 

Just an FYI: I don't know how DA:I ends, so please don't post a spoiler regarding that. I haven't finished the game yet. 

 

Do you think it's possible that our Inquisitors will continue to be the main character in the next two games? (If they develop the next two games. BioWare said there was a potential for a total of five Dragon Age games. If someone can find the source on that, I'd appreciate it.)

 

I'd really love for my Inquisitor(s) to continue on in the franchise rather than make a brand new hero each time. I became pretty attached to Shepard throughout Mass Effect. But the Inquisitor is even better than Shepard, in my opinion, because you can make up to 8 different Inquisitors. (Shepard only had two options - a man or woman.) 

 

So will Dragon Age #3 through #5 involve a lengthy, ongoing adventure with your Inquisition hero? I truly hope so. Getting to know my protag over and over again? Sure, that has its charm. 

 

But... I want to be with my Inquisitor for the long haul.   

 

I don't want to spoil the ending of the game for you as I was accused of doing for someone else (though IMO I didn't), but it seems to me if the next game takes place outside of Ferelden/Orlais as has been rumored then the Inqusitor won't be the main character. He/she could be like an NPC that appears in this game from a previous game though.

[TevinterSupremacist]

No. DA4 better be about "The Magister". To be honest, quizzie was almost a goodie-two-shoes.

[PrinceofTime]

Hell no. The Inquisitor is the most boring DA protagonist to date. Like i said before, have a new MC with each new entry was a great move on Bioware part. If theres a DA4 then were heading North to get to real interesting places in Thedas. Hopefully we can play as an actual Qunari and a non noble Human.

[BubbleDncr]

I've gotten used to the idea of a new protagonist every game, so at this point I'd say no, I would not like my Inquisitor to return as the protagonist, no matter how much I love her. 

 

But I do think we'll get at least a couple dlc with the Inquisitor, and I'm hoping we'll see her in DA4, similar to how we've seen Hawke. But based on how the story goes, I have my own theories on some pretty good reasons why we wouldn't play as the Inquisitor in the future, but would still be interesting if they had a cameo. 

[NakedEmperor]

I want to have a new protagonist next game. This will give me the option of recruiting the Hero of Ferelden, the Champion of Kirkwall and the Herald of Andraste. Then I can play with all my characters at the same time

[Natureguy85]

I like Dragon Age in the idea that you have a shared world but differing heroes. I makes sense too as this is meant to be the Dragon AGE not just the Dragon A Few Years in the middle of an Age.

 

... so no. I don't want Inquisitor to be anymore involved than this one.

 

What, you don't want to have the same hero getting old?

Isn't that what Metal Gear Solid did?

[Bizantura]

No, really not waiting for that.  Rather they start a new protagonist and compagnions new and fresh.  Tired of interesting stories ending on a whimper (Morrigans come to mind)  retcons needed to bring back old compagnions whoms personality has radical changed ect....  Full complete, making sense story, put in one game please.  Put small clifhangers in the game that will be solved by appropriate dlc to follow for the more fan people who are interested.

[wicked cool]

Most games want you to start at level 1 so i doubt it beyond dlc. I just hope they have a readonable ending instead of oops the inquisitor is missing

[Cheviot]

Hell no. The Inquisitor is the most boring DA protagonist to date.

So you haven't played Origins?  That game's protagonist reacts to most things with gormless silence, except the one or two times it remembers to attempt a facial expression.

[PrinceofTime]

So you haven't played Origins?  That game's protagonist reacts to most things with gormless silence, except the one or two times it remembers to attempt a facial expression.

 

Either you blind or this is just your cheeky at attempt sarcasm, probably both but ill help you. Look under my avi.

 

Its my opinion, nothing else needs to be said here. Move along.

[Natureguy85]

So you haven't played Origins?  That game's protagonist reacts to most things with gormless silence, except the one or two times it remembers to attempt a facial expression.

 

Yeah but a lot of people liked that it allowed more role play.

[RUDAL]

I think the one of the things that BioWare done wrong with DA is that they created a new hero for each game. People were expecting a sort of ME protagonist where you can grow to like the character and are curious about what's next.

 

I think if we would have a Shepard-like main character with different story each time not even tightly connected to previous game then it would be easier to get into the story and different companions each time.

I don't think the impact that the story have on the world is that important.

I'll give the example of Geralt of Rivia (the one from books not the one from games). Sapkowski created a world and a main character and then wrote series of short stories about him.

What's great is that the only connection between the stories are the characters in them. You can read them in whatever order you want and it'll still make sense.

What Bioware should do with DA games is let us create our own hero and then "tell" us the stories.

I'm under impression that BW wanted to do something like that but took out the anchor, the hero who would connect all games. Returning companions and the world itself is not enough.

[Natureguy85]

I think the one of the things that BioWare done wrong with DA is that they created a new hero for each game. People were expecting a sort of ME protagonist where you can grow to like the character and are curious about what's next.

 

I think if we would have a Shepard-like main character with different story each time not even tightly connected to previous game then it would be easier to get into the story and different companions each time.

I don't think the impact that the story have on the world is that important.

I'll give the example of Geralt of Rivia (the one from books not the one from games). Sapkowski created a world and a main character and then wrote series of short stories about him.

What's great is that the only connection between the stories are the characters in them. You can read them in whatever order you want and it'll still make sense.

What Bioware should do with DA games is let us create our own hero and then "tell" us the stories.

I'm under impression that BW wanted to do something like that but took out the anchor, the hero who would connect all games. Returning companions and the world itself is not enough.

 

I don't know; I was happy with Origins being a self contained story and was fine with having a new character in DA2. The actual story was the problem in that game. Origins also left a number of questions that I wanted to know more about, such as Morrigan's plan's, Flemeth's nature, and what the truth was behind the Black City, Fade, and Darkspawn. The interaction with Morrigan was the one thing that made me want to carry forward with my Warden, but other than that, a new PC with a new story was fine. The Ultimate Sacrifice was a nice ending option and you can't have that it you need the PC to continue. We know Bioware doesn't handle PC resurrection well...

 

Anyway, I thought this was a fine way to separate their two series.

[Yokokorama]

I'll probably get hate for this, but in this particular case, I hope we get the Inquisitor again.  We spend the entire game building up the Inquisition's military might and sphere of influence, but hardly ever get proper bearing of just how much it has grown. 

 

I hope that a future Dragon Age game will allow us to once again play as the Inquisitor but also take advantage of the Inquisition as an entity and increase the amount of transparency the player has to it.  If my advisors / companions weren't constantly telling me "the Inquisition is growing" I'd never actually know because it is never something I can actually see in the game.

 

If we change protagonists now, the build up of the Inquisition will feel rather pointless in hindsight.  We have this massive organization with wide reaching influence, the loyalty of numerous powerhouses (no specifics here due to no spoilers), and a big army of its own, yet none of this is ever applied in game.  I am hoping it is applied in future games sometime down the line, though.  It'd be a shame if it is just tossed aside.

[Giubba]

Just an FYI: I don't know how DA:I ends, so please don't post a spoiler regarding that. I haven't finished the game yet.

Do you think it's possible that our Inquisitors will continue to be the main character in the next two games? (If they develop the next two games. BioWare said there was a potential for a total of five Dragon Age games. If someone can find the source on that, I'd appreciate it.)

I'd really love for my Inquisitor(s) to continue on in the franchise rather than make a brand new hero each time. I became pretty attached to Shepard throughout Mass Effect. But the Inquisitor is even better than Shepard, in my opinion, because you can make up to 8 different Inquisitors. (Shepard only had two options - a man or woman.)

So will Dragon Age #3 through #5 involve a lengthy, ongoing adventure with your Inquisition hero? I truly hope so. Getting to know my protag over and over again? Sure, that has its charm.

But... I want to be with my Inquisitor for the long haul.

No it's common knowledge that in DA franchise each game will have its stand alone protagonist

[leaguer of one]

No. How many time does bw have to say each da game is going to have a new pc.

[Valerius]

Please don't do this bioware! How else am I going to play my future tevinter magister in da4? Inquisition was cool and all but if anything it seems as though it set the story for something more.

[RUDAL]

I don't know; I was happy with Origins being a self contained story and was fine with having a new character in DA2. The actual story was the problem in that game. Origins also left a number of questions that I wanted to know more about, such as Morrigan's plan's, Flemeth's nature, and what the truth was behind the Black City, Fade, and Darkspawn. The interaction with Morrigan was the one thing that made me want to carry forward with my Warden, but other than that, a new PC with a new story was fine. The Ultimate Sacrifice was a nice ending option and you can't have that it you need the PC to continue. We know Bioware doesn't handle PC resurrection well...

 

Anyway, I thought this was a fine way to separate their two series.

I feel somehow disconnected playing DA games.

I think I would prefer if each DA game was with new PC and completely different story not connected with any characters.

[canarius]

We should play as the Hero of Ferelden in the future Dragon Age games not Inquisitor and not a new hero. Hero of Ferelden could be the Shepard of Dragon Age but Bioware failed to see that opportunity.