When we are talking about personal level of power, it does not seem right to bring the weight of an entire organization that stood behind each character. It's like arguing who is a better racer between A and B while including the fact that A drives a Ferrari and B drives a Pinto. Saying the Inquisitor is more powerful because of the Inquisition does *not* signify his/her *own* power as an individual. Besides, the Inquisitor does not strike me as a shrewd tactician in terms of diplomacy or political maneuvering--it's all Leliana, Josephine, and in terms of leading soldiers, Cullen. He/she's just largely a figurehead. Really, take out these three, and what can the Inquisitor him/herself achieve by virtue of his/her own intellect/cunning/power...?
Can you even begin to imagine what kind of force/clout/power the Inquisition would have if the Hero of Ferelden is the one picked to lead it, as per the original plan? The person who we *know for a fact* a powerful warrior on his/her own (you don't get to kill stuff like Broodmother or Harvester with clever tongue alone), who we *know for a fact* capable of political maneuvering, who we *know for a fact* also very capable in directing/leading/commanding entire armies made up of widely different compositions and parties to a single cause? And this is without the help of a Spymaster, a Military Commander, and a Master Diplomat?
Hawke doesn't really count since he/she's just a great fighter and not that I'd seen capable of leading an organization such as Inquisition, at least not to the extent where it could reach results as great as if the Warden/Inquisitor lead it.
So, it would be much more interesting to rate them independently of their organization/backing, and I do believe this is what the OP asked.
And personally, I'd rate Warden at the top.





Retour en haut




