You can always trust that even when men have nothing to say, they'll be giving your their opinions. No idea how you're even holding the word 'condescending' here.
They clearly have something to say, you made a thread about it and they're giving your their opinion that hey sex exists. There exists overtly sexual characters in the Witcher book and the video game and in real life. It isn't sexist that characters are explicitly sexual nor that sex sells, also I assume you are familiar with the game Triss is a fully fleshed out character with a backstory, her potential romance with Geralt is one facet of her character. What do you want? Everyone to wear overcoats, flare jeans and avoid the subject of sex entirely?
Why does everything have to push the social progressive boundary? Why is it the two games are even comparable? I'm sure if you don't want to see these scenes can can choose not to see them as is it is an RPG and people complain that they want to play the character their way i.e. be and ***hole and womanize or avoid that part all together. I thought DA: I was a fantastic socially progressive game, however; if the creator/writer has crafted a world where this doesn't fit into his or her ethos and world building then they should feel no obligation to do so.
And please don't respond as has been to case to many so far with 'is a man, his opinion is formed with a stone age brain, won't listen, didn't ask'