It should appear as an option so long as you don't progress far enough in the main story to reveal the corruption in the GW ranks.
I think it's also appears if you don't exile the wardens. I already did that quest when I judged him.
It should appear as an option so long as you don't progress far enough in the main story to reveal the corruption in the GW ranks.
I think it's also appears if you don't exile the wardens. I already did that quest when I judged him.
Guest_simfamUP_*
I didn't bother.
Let him run.
It doesn't affect my Inquisition in any way.
Better for me.
I could install one of my own as mayor of Crestwood.
Yay for manipulation!
i exile him. i do not have the GW option and he will do badly as one. I wanted to jail him at first but decided not to in the end because he did what he did. I have killed plenty of people too so i shouldn't judge.
I gave him to Denerim. He did not act against the Inquisition, did not impede the quest to close the breach or stop the Elder One, and his crime predated the formation of the organization. This was clearly a Ferelden issue, not an Inquisition one.
[snip]The taint is an incredibly slow and painful death... FOR MEN. For women, the taint turns you into a darkspawn-producing broodmother.[snip]
In actuality, you are wrong. The taint affects men and women in exactly the same way: Turning them into ghouls or a most painful death. To become a Broodmother requires other additions (Seventh day she grew as in her mouth they spew).
Or did you never encounter Adria in Awakening? She was a Ghoul.
EDIT: typos
Modifié par Gold Dragon, 03 décembre 2014 - 12:49 .
I executed him for his crimes. Had he manned up and confessed what he had done and explained why he did it I would consider him for the Wardens but instead he ran for his pitiful life when the truth emerged.
Count me among those who sent him back to Denerim. As others have said, the Inquisition might have 'discovered' his crime, but it happened in a Ferelden village prior to the forming of the Inquisition, was not related to the Breach (my immediate concern), and affected Ferelden citizens, not Inquisition agents. It's a no brainer to me: Send him to King Alistair and Queen Anora to decide what to do with him. No reason for me to play "Judge Judy and executioner" on this one.....
I see Ferelden and the other polities of Thedas as being subject to the Inquisition and it's judgments.
A few healthy who die because they were too stupid to leave is their own issue. I don't really feel empathy towards dumb people though.
In a way I agree with you - sadly I couldn't let him go (or even better: recruit him as an agent - damned that guy is a politician and not afraid to make hard choices...I might not agree fully with the choice he made (quarantine might have worked, with the people who didn't want to leave locked in with the sick (barricades with archers around them and no one allowed to leave until the blight ran its course...meaning till they should all be dead (would send wardens in to check at the earliest possible time, as they can't be infected!))...well, yes, I could - so it was exile for this guy ![]()
greetings LAX
I gave him the blessing of freeing his conscience, by execution.
I didn't bother.
Let him run.
Yeah same, waste of manpower to track him down.
Gave him to Ferelden. Like a few here has said; it didn't seem relevant to the Inquisition at all, they just happened to be the ones who revealed it. He made a terrible choice at a terrible time. But my Inq is also very against having to judge people at all too so.
Gave him to Ferelden. Like a few here has said; it didn't seem relevant to the Inquisition at all, they just happened to be the ones who revealed it. He made a terrible choice at a terrible time. But my Inq is also very against having to judge people at all too so.
I honestly consider executing him as the most benevolent choice. In fact even he remarks on it. Think about it, the guilt has been killing him on the inside for years upon years.
Fair point, but how can one not appreciate a moral code that puts the needs of many/more over those of the few/fewer, while at the same time trying to find a balance which benefits everyone, except for extreme situations of course, in which the few needs sacrificing if that means saving the many contrary to losing all anyways.
That's why I said, disagreeing with such moral code, is just ****ing dumb or not understanding it.
I don't mind his decision, I mind that he didn't own up to his actions and ran from them. If he willingly came forward, I would have been much more lenient. He didn't. He not only lied he confessed and then ran from it.
I don't mind his decision, I mind that he didn't own up to his actions and ran from them. If he willingly came forward, I would have been much more lenient. He didn't. He not only lied he confessed and then ran from it.
Where was the option to say what the mayor did was not as bad as what some of the things the grey wardens have done. I believe that he made a hard and neccisary decision. No punishment. He did what had to be done and had the burden to bear that pain on his own.
I killed more "potentially" innocent mages/merch/people/animal/spirits than him so that I can save more people. So I just exiled him as I remember.
No option to free him?
He sacrificed the village to save those yet alive. Thats like being a captain of a ship, save half the crew because there are no more life boats, and then be trialed for not saving everyone. I guess logical thinking and utilitarian moral philosophy has no place in Thedas.
I think it's also appears if you don't exile the wardens. I already did that quest when I judged him.
Yes. I judged him after I did that quest and didn't exile the grey wardens.
No option to free him?
He sacrificed the village to save those yet alive. Thats like being a captain of a ship, save half the crew because there are no more life boats, and then be trialed for not saving everyone. I guess logical thinking and utilitarian moral philosophy has no place in Thedas.
I know right? Like I get that everyone wants people to hold hands and sing kumbaya, but the fact is IRL you have to make nasty decisions when you are a leader. I really wish bioware would force that more. At some point you do have to choose between who lives and dies. Like Iron bull his choice no matter what was hard to make. People died regardless of his decision, he got to choose WHICH people die. That's ****** hard.
I handed him over to Ferelden.
It was Ferelden citizens he killed, let them judge him.
He ran because he wisely knew the idiocy of judging actions he took during a blight when 10 years have passed. It wasn't going to go well for him and he knew it.
I think I would have done the same thing as him to be honest. I'd like to think that I'd own up to my own actions afterwards and accept the repercussions though, but who knows.