Maybe something of a nitpick, but I'm trying to get my ideas straight on the nature a Trevelyan Inquisitor's combat training, and the martial training of nobility in general in the DA verse.
A key part of the Trevelyan bacground is the connection to the Chantry, so a warrior Trevelyan is easily assumed to have basic Templar training or some degree of responsibility for the family troops, but what about a rogue? It makes zero sense for a young noble of either gender to be trained in the use of two knives. A full-sized weapon and an off-hand dagger maybe, as fencing and duelling were common sports among nobility and that combination isn't horribly exotic, but two daggers is silly. It's horribly impractical, and doesn't fit the poised, dignified image of nobility at all.
Of the four Thedasian noblemen I know of in the series who are confirmed or implied to be rogues, Bryce was never seen fight, Howe fought with an axe and an off-hand dagger, and Nathaniel and Sebastian are both predominantly archers, which could be more or less excused by lots of hunting experience and ditto for an archer Trevelyan. Nathanial is said to have received some kind of specialized training in the Free Marches, but it's never elaborated on to my knowledge.
So, I'd like to know people's thoughts and what sorts of backgrounds you imagine for your characters to explain why they're trained and/or choose to fight with two knives or with the bow as opposed to the more easily explained warrior training.





Retour en haut







