Ce sujet est fermé
anmiro wrote...
Faerlyte wrote...
Anastassia wrote...
anmiro wrote...
In ME1 all it took was a recommendation from Nihlus to make Shepard a candidate for becoming a Spectre. Was any else expecting Shepard to put Garrus's name forward to the council as a potential Spectre. After all, two Turian Spectres die over the course of ME1, so we know the position is open.
Depending on which way you take him, he'll tell you he plans to train as a Spectre (renegade) or go back to C-Sec (paragon).
He'll still apply (or intended to at any rate) for Spectre status if you go the paragon route, but he states his intentions to do things right when he does rather than sacrificing innocent people to get the job done. Then he says something to the effect of if he can't do it the right way, how can he expect the people he's supposed to be protecting to trust him.
Does he say that in ME1 or in ME2? Because the point I was trying make is that despite all the conversations in ME1, where you seem to be making some headway with Garrus, they ultimately have no impact on what happens to Garrus in ME2. So, Whether you coached him as a renegade or paragon in ME1, it makes no difference in ME2. In ME2 they simply ignore all those conversations and present you with another oppertunity to influence Garrus's personality.
I mention all this because I'm really hoping that the choices I made in the first two games are actually going reflected in Garrus's personality in the last game.
That's what he said in ME1. In ME2 he basically says that he got tired of bureaurocratic BS with both C-Sec and the Council (I think he included the Council that is), which is why he ultimately leaves - I can understand this considering after Shepard's "deah" everyone tries to sweep under the rug what Shepard essentially uncovered in the first game, which, for anyone who was there with Shepard (ie Garrus), would be beyond frustrating. I don't blame him for getting fed up with it - I would too.
The way I see it as far as whether or not your actions reflect on him, what you say in each game will decide whether he takes the renegade or paragon route in each situation, so really, whether or not this is a recurring theme with him, he is the most influential of the characters. Now whether Bioware wants to make those decisions actually amount to something in the final installment of the trilogy no one knows, but we'll see.
Sedonis is not an innocent person so one can see Garrus' point of view in this case because it's not the same scenario as in ME1.
Retour en haut
cause baby food is gross.
