Hardly anyone has had the chance to play it. No time for the hype to calm down. No time for replayability worth to kick in. It just baffles me why they chose DA:I other than maybe the electors had a bias for being pro bioware.
The judges judge it on its own merits. Where does the player factor in?
What about unpopular songs that are rarely heard by anyone. Should they never receive recognition?
The judges are indifferent to the hype. You are claiming bias when there is none. Otherwise, this argument can be used against the other games. What if a judge hates EA?
One can consider replayability an objective fact, given that there are many origins, many choices, and many paths. Perhaps each judge played the game in a different way and each offered their opinion on the matter.
So all in all, you know nothing on how the reward was picked, yet refuse to acknowledge the result.
You may dislike the game as much as you wish, but how can you be baffled when you have no insight?