Aller au contenu

Photo

So...has Bioware changed The Qun?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
646 réponses à ce sujet

#526
Shimmer_Gloom

Shimmer_Gloom
  • Members
  • 573 messages

Because he would rather become tal-vashoth then let his men die. He'd rather turn against the Qun then obey its demands. Would you trust an athiest to discuss christianity to you from a perspective that's from a christian?


If that Athiest had gone to Seminary, heck yeah! Lol

Iron Bull has a profound understanding of the Qun. The fact that he can become Tal Vashoth does not negate the fact that he is a KEY member the Ben Hassrath and has been for a long time.

Were he not, you would NOT be getting all of those Inteligence reports nor would you be getting a chance at an historic Qunari alliance. Iron Bull plays the thug but he is far better situated to know the workings of the Qun than Sten. Sten was a grunt. Bull actually saw the inner workings of Qunari politics.

#527
Shimmer_Gloom

Shimmer_Gloom
  • Members
  • 573 messages
Could be that Iron Bull's deeper knowledge of Qunari politics grants him familiarity with the term Aqun Athlock and Sten's does not? Could it be that Aqun Athlock are not talked about in polite Qunari society and are seen as men or women (respectively) and never refered to as anything else?

After all, a Sten is refered to as a Sten FIRST. Everything else need not matter to the Qun.

This seems possible. And could be the reason for Sten's perplexion.

#528
joejoe099

joejoe099
  • Members
  • 468 messages

If that Athiest had gone to Seminary, heck yeah! Lol

Iron Bull has a profound understanding of the Qun. The fact that he can become Tal Vashoth does not negate the fact that he is a KEY member the Ben Hassrath and has been for a long time.

Were he not, you would NOT be getting all of those Inteligence reports nor would you be getting a chance at an historic Qunari alliance. Iron Bull plays the thug but he is far better situated to know the workings of the Qun than Sten. Sten was a grunt. Bull actually saw the inner workings of Qunari politics.

 

it only shows his ability as a spy, not as a follower of the Qun.

 

Hell, seeing as how it backfired for them to actually give him chance of having a replacement job, something already going against the qun with Iron Bull, if your argument is true, it might not be for long seeing as giving people the 'ability of choice' or a chance even backfires, they might take that away.



#529
Shimmer_Gloom

Shimmer_Gloom
  • Members
  • 573 messages

it only shows his ability as a spy, not as a follower of the Qun.

Hell, seeing as how it backfired for them to actually give him chance of having a replacement job, something already going against the qun with Iron Bull, if your argument is true, it might not be for long seeing as giving people the 'ability of choice' or a chance even backfires, they might take that away.


Nowhere do I talk about choice. My 'atheist that went to seminary' analogy still holds.

Bull lived under the Qun for a time. Regardless of his possible status as Tal Vashoth this is pretty much accepted to be true.

#530
joejoe099

joejoe099
  • Members
  • 468 messages

Nowhere do I talk about choice. My 'atheist that went to seminary' analogy still holds.

Bull lived under the Qun for a time. Regardless of his possible status as Tal Vashoth this is pretty much accepted to be true.

 

but he doesn't have the mentality to back it in a true light, as any other true follower would.

 

Being labeled Tal-vashoth is worse than being branded a heretic or excommunicated. it's both, and as a traitor that needs to be, before all else, dealt with.

 

going back to prior comments, i'm willing to accept it if the convert came later in life and was already established as trans, but not already within the Qun. But even then they wouldn't need a word for it.

 

In all honesty, this entire debate wouldn't have happened if Bioware wasn't so dead set on being 'inclusive' for no reason or than 'look at us, we're progressive.' it's taking the fun out of the game, and making it more of some political or cultural message. I just really don't want one of my old favorite game companies to lead the charge to making games the new modern art, where poop on a wall is raved for being 'deep' and 'strong message giving on state of politics'.



#531
Shimmer_Gloom

Shimmer_Gloom
  • Members
  • 573 messages
Well, Joe. We are at an impass. I WANT my games to be art. I WANT my games to be inclusive.

To suggest otherwise is honestly offensive to me. I say we leave it at that. :/
  • Shelidon aime ceci

#532
berrieh

berrieh
  • Members
  • 669 messages

I think what seems like a "change" is likely a change of perspective. Like if you live in a foreign country for awhile, you see the same things, but they seem different as you get to know the culture more and more. So we had assumptions of the Qun based on a sliver of information, and they need to evolve with each sliver as we get it and not cling to our assumptions. 

 

You can't say you're a man because you're not one, you're playing a female character. 

 

Sten asking this question doesn't mean he thinks you can decide your sex by self-identifying, he's just confused by the PC not sticking to the Qun's role for women. He asks ''Why would women wish to be men?'' and I don't see why he also wouldn't say the same to a woman who happens to bind and claims she's a man because once again, you are what you are born as, you do not choose, it's beyond your control, etc. Moreover Qunaris are educated into fitting the role attributed to them since they're children, Tamassrans teach them their their place in the world and how to know themselves. Do you think they ask them if they identified as men or women first? It's clearly assigned based on their sex. 

 

You are missing the point.

 

Krem is a man and appears as a man and would answer as a man. How do you know how Sten would respond to him? 

 

1. Sten asks the question - meaning he checks for understanding of your nature.

2. It's not about "choosing" as much as embracing your nature. A trans person doesn't "choose" to be a different gender; they naturally identify as a different gender, and they choose to embrace their nature; how does that not fit the Qun.

3. "Your nature" has a different meaning than the word "nature." In the first phrase, it means innateness. Now, to me, a transgender person has an "innateness" of the gender they feel they are; it is essentially who they are. To you, maybe not. But to the Qunari, aside from Bull's comments, nothing addresses this, so you cannot say what makes someone's nature under the Qun. Sten doesn't address this in regard to gender. He merely says you must follow it to follow the Qun.

 

I know how Qunari are educated. Bull explains this as well. How do we know a Tamassaran cannot even pick out a child who is trans? We don't know anything about the skills of the Tamassaran or how they go about understanding a child's nature. We also know they are NOT put into roles "at birth." They are educated, raised, and evaluated for roles throughout all of childhood, but roles aren't decided then. The Tamassaran clearly evaluate these roles thoroughly and decide them very carefully. Otherwise, it would be a waste and go against the Qun.

 

If they decide very carefully, why would they not consider the gender the child's nature seems to be, based on his/her nature, aptitude, and actions rather than just the gender of the parts they were born with? No one has answered this. It's just been a lot of "Born with woman parts is a woman" bullshit, which we have no reason to believe the Qunari would believe. We know that the Qunari believe you are what you are, but we have no idea how they arrive at that conclusion except that they give it great importance. 

 

To me, this fits perfectly with my understanding of the Qun because I never believed they were only rigid and totalitarian; based on all I read, and the mixed Codex entries, and the mix of what Sten says, I always believed they were a combination of that and deeply philosophical and wise in some areas. The whole bits with your "essential nature" - they fit into this perfectly. A person's essential nature is important, but in most societies (those the Qunari look down on), it is often not even revealed. People are at the top who belong at the bottom. People are in roles they don't fit into and thus want to change. They are unsatisfied. The idea of the Qun and having a strict role is both to serve society and to derive perfect satisfaction from it. Why would they not accommodate for your very nature and only examine your body parts? 

 

That class was talking about gender as identity and choice. The Qun is based on identity from nature. if nature gave you man parts then it was because nature assigned you the role man. If nature gave you lady parts, then nature assigned you the role of lady.

 

If the Qun didn't care about sex only gender identity, then Sten would never have been surprised to see a female Grey Warden fighting. He would have simply thought she thought she thought she was a man and would have never brought it up. Sten does bring it up because under the Qun, identity is based on genitals, not gender identification.

 

Nowhere in any game does the phrase, "gender identity from nature" come in. This is an assumption. The Qun talks about not denying your nature, yes, but that could easily be made to support the argument that, of course, what Iron Bull says makes sense, because Krem in a dress is denying his nature. 

 

Nature =/ body parts. The word doesn't only mean biology.

 

The way Sten brings it up is literally, "I don't understand. You look like a woman?" He brings it up because she looks and presents as a woman, but he even asks for clarification. The female Grey Warden is not trans, and cannot be used to examine how Sten would view someone like Krem who neither looks like a woman nor would say, "Yep, I'm a woman." 

 

The Qunari also put people into rolls at birth, dismissing any idea for gender to actually form in the child.

 

 

Going back 20 pages of arguing in circles, Sten's EXACT QUOTE is questioning is "A person is born. Qunari, or elf, or human, or dwarf. The size of his hand. Wither he's clever or foolish. The land he comes from, the color of his hair. These are things beyond his control. We do not choose, we simply are." and the follow up question of 'but a person can choose to be more' is met with "Can they?" meaning it was never met in qunari society.

 

1.) The Qunari do not get their roles at birth. They are carefully examined from birth, but their roles are chosen later. Based on their natures. 

 

2.) Right. But you are assuming a trans person is "choosing their gender" which is really not true per se. Krem didn't "choose" to feel he was a man; he merely does. That is part of his nature as well, part of what he is. Why would a group of people who appreciate what you ARE not allow that? Why would they point to body parts instead of your very nature? Why is it not possible they see what you truly are and have a word for it? It does not break the Qun. A baker changing his mind and wanting to be a soldier; someone wanting a role they are ill suited to; someone wanting to live as a woman but fight as a man - these deny the Qun, yes, but someone wanting to live as a man and fight as a man, who happens to have ****** and a vagina, nothing in that quote disparages that. Nowhere does Sten express any notion of what "makes" a woman. (In fact, he has a banter with Morrigan where he says Neither the fact that the females fighting - mage and warrior alike - are women or warriors has been proven to him.) Just that one must be wholly consistent with his/her role. Gender doesn't have to be biological. That is a myth perpetuated by our own understanding in our own society. 

 

The funny thing is I'm not even usually someone who can stand to listen to the Tumblr crowd on stuff like this, but it just doesn't seem so hard to me. Yeah, the Qunari are big on roles. Yes, they have gender roles. But they accept that gender is about more than penis/vagina - this is not a concept unknown to everyone. The concepts of male and female aren't even just applied to people. I don't think it's that weird for the Qunari to apply them philosophically. 

 

Qunari don't care about gender identity, they care about sex. Allowing someone to choose their gender is no different from allowing someone to choose their job. Allowing someone to change their gender (as choosing one's gender involves the process of changing one's gender) is the same as allowing someone to change their job. The Qun would say that if someone was meant to be a man, they would have been born with a penis. Since they don't have a penis, then they can't be a man.

 

Why do we know that the Qunari base gender solely on your sex parts? Show me that quote.

 

There isn't one. Because this is an assumption, based upon our understanding of gender (not theirs) that you got from the sliver you saw, but now that you have seen more, you should assimilate the idea that Qunari do not base gender on your sex parts but rather on your innate role and nature. That you can have the nature of a man in the body of a woman, and the Qunari honor your nature, rather than your body. This fits with the Qun and their strict adherence to your nature. 


  • DarkSpiral, Shimmer_Gloom et loominousfish aiment ceci

#533
Taura-Tierno

Taura-Tierno
  • Members
  • 887 messages

Oh, but we do, bull says it himself: Deviating from assigned roles is not accepted under the Qun. If you do, you either get readjucated or go Tal Vashoth. If anything, a priestess that wanted to fight as the males do would be taken to readjucation until this tendencies would go away, not the other way around. It's not about individual identity, but about role in society. You got your role, it's pretty much over. Now, I know Bull was picked to be a spy based on aptitude, but would he not already have been with the warriors, nobody would have cared about his skills.

 

As I said earlier, though, all of that only applies to Qunai born...

You are right that it could be different for people who convert; they might very well be entered into the Qun as the gender with which they identify. 

But it also be that the Qunari are simply better at identifying people who are trans at young ages. Maybe they have a higher awareness of it. 

Or the whole issue might be something of an exception. They might have come to learn that people who are trans simply cannot be "changed" into not identifying as such, and that the only way for them to be used to the full extent of their abilities is to reintegrate them into society as the gender with which they identify, if they are to reach their full potential as people under the Qun. And perhaps this is so rare that is not often spoken about simply because it does not occur frequently. I see no reason why the Qun would not have special rules for special situations. Perhaps a religious authority has to be involved in the issue and confirm that this is indeed what has transpired. 



#534
WarBaby2

WarBaby2
  • Members
  • 1 019 messages

Or the whole issue might be something of an exception. They might have come to learn that people who are trans simply cannot be "changed" into not identifying as such, and that the only way for them to be used to the full extent of their abilities is to reintegrate them into society as the gender with which they identify, if they are to reach their full potential as people under the Qun. And perhaps this is so rare that is not often spoken about simply because it does not occur frequently. I see no reason why the Qun would not have special rules for special situations. Perhaps a religious authority has to be involved in the issue and confirm that this is indeed what has transpired. 

That could be possible, true... since the question never came up before DAI, I ca't argue with that.



#535
Sah291

Sah291
  • Members
  • 1 240 messages

I think it's just a side effect of the decision to make the Qun a religion, and one that actively converts anyone, and not a race. They accept anyone, and would expect converts to assimilate into the fold. So it makes a lot of sense actually. The Qunari are therefore both accepting of diversity, enough to actively convert and assimilate other cultures they conquer. But this is not necessarily an acceptance of individualism, since converts must conform to a group/role. Individualism =/= diversity. 



#536
NUM13ER

NUM13ER
  • Members
  • 959 messages

I have no issue with Bull accepting Krem but suggesting the Qun would be tolerant of this seemed completely contradictory.

The group who think women and men have distinct roles in life dictated by their gender? The same ones preaching about never trying to be something you're not and struggle being an illusion, would be accepting of this? I couldn't reconcile that.

In fact, before Bull went on to state they'd accept Krem, I would have been convinced the term Qunari use for someone "born as one gender, living as another" would have been completely derogatory.


  • Icy Magebane aime ceci

#537
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 418 messages

Because he would rather become tal-vashoth then let his men die. He'd rather turn against the Qun then obey its demands. Would you trust an athiest to discuss christianity to you from a perspective that's from a full believing christian standpoint.

 

This is a very bad comparison considering how much the average christian cherry picks the part of their religion they follow.

 

And honestly I would trust neither. The Christian would be too lenient. The Atheist too harsh.

 

Also I'm amused that people were fine with the Qun being completely implausible before (no sex, we pick your job for you from when you're a child and nothing will ever change that because there's no way that could go wrong) with no flexibility. Yet this is a system that somehow wastes nothing. It's simply impossible for that to be the case without some flexibility. It doesn't have to be a lot. But some yes. Reeducation and switching jobs already shows the Qun isn't that unbendable.



#538
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

This is a very bad comparison considering how much the average christian cherry picks the part of their religion they follow.

 

And honestly I would trust neither. The Christian would be too lenient. The Atheist too harsh.

 

Also I'm amused that people were fine with the Qun being completely implausible before (no sex, we pick your job for you from when you're a child and nothing will ever change that because there's no way that could go wrong) with no flexibility. Yet this is a system that somehow wastes nothing. It's simply impossible for that to be the case without some flexibility. It doesn't have to be a lot. But some yes. Reeducation and switching jobs already shows the Qun isn't that unbendable.

 

Hey, if we're lucky, maybe it'll just become completely indistinguishable from every other faction. 

 

Whoever we are, whatever you want, the Qun is for you. It's all good, bro..

 

I can see the Billboards now.



#539
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 418 messages

Hey, if we're lucky, maybe it'll just become completely indistinguishable from every other faction. 

 

Whoever we are, whatever you want, the Qun is for you. It's all good, bro..

 

I can see the Billboards now.

 

Because some flexible tweaks means they're indistinguishable from every other faction. *sigh*



#540
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

Because some flexible tweaks means they're indistinguishable from every other faction. *sigh*

 

No, I'm saying now it's just a matter of time.

 

 

From what I gather, the Qun is based on Plato's ideals. In his view, there were two states: Being and Becoming. Being was the world of ideals and perfection expression of things. A place where a "chair" had only one form: the ideal, perfect chair. Every other chair in existence was only a poor replica of it. They existed in a state of "becoming".

 

Same goes for women, men, cats, dogs... everything.

 

 

Now just follow me here for a sec. The minute you slide just a bit from this high standard of "Being", then you fail. You are "Becoming" instead. 

 

And this is what is happening with these new views from Iron Bull. His brand of the Qun is a "Becoming" version. A flexible type. One without definitive expressions. And ultimately it's not the Qun, as originally set forth. He might as well just go balls out and let everything be defined flexibly. Because he's already failed the state of "Being" as it is.



#541
Casuist

Casuist
  • Members
  • 388 messages

Hey, if we're lucky, maybe it'll just become completely indistinguishable from every other faction. 

 

Whoever we are, whatever you want, the Qun is for you. It's all good, bro..

 

I can see the Billboards now.

 

A philosophical perspective towards gender identity under the Qun that differs from every other faction...

 

...makes the factions more similar?

 

up is down?



#542
AzureAardvark

AzureAardvark
  • Members
  • 293 messages

up is down?

 

Why not? The Qun already stacks the double-speak to the rafters, what's one more?



#543
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

A philosophical perspective towards gender identity under the Qun that differs from every other faction...

 

...makes the factions more similar?

 

up is down?

 

The real truth is that it probably hasn't changed at all. And that Iron Bull is full of ****. And a lost man. He needs a hug. 



#544
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 418 messages

No, I'm saying now it's just a matter of time.

 

 

From what I gather, the Qun is based on Plato's ideals. In his view, there were two states: Being and Becoming. Being was the world of ideals and perfection expression of things. A place where a "chair" had only one form: the ideal, perfect chair. Every other chair in existence was only a poor replica of it. They existed in a state of "becoming".

 

Same goes for women, men, cats, dogs... everything.

 

 

Now just follow me here for a sec. The minute you slide just a bit from this high standard of "Being", then you fail. You are "Becoming" instead. 

 

And this is what is happening with these new views from Iron Bull. His brand of the Qun is a "Becoming" version. A flexible type. One without definitive expressions. And ultimately it's not the Qun, as originally set forth. He might as well just go balls out and let everything be defined flexibly. Because he's already failed the state of "Being" as it is.

 

uh huh.

 

I need more weed for this to make sense.



#545
Putok

Putok
  • Members
  • 122 messages

Given the Qunari are apparently quite adept at choosing the correct roles for people at a young age, why assume that they cannot determine the correct gender identity for someone at a young age?


  • Shimmer_Gloom aime ceci

#546
atamajakki

atamajakki
  • Members
  • 323 messages
Sten is a military grunt. He openly admits that he cannot accurately describe the Aun beyond the Antaam.
Iron Bull is an intelligence agent. He clearly has access to education and social knowledge that Sten would be lacking in.

Who would you trust more to understand a society, a soldier or a spy?

#547
AzureAardvark

AzureAardvark
  • Members
  • 293 messages

Who would you trust more to understand a society, a soldier or a spy?

 

Who would you trust more to give you an honest answer, the soldier or the guy whose title translates as "liar"? :)



#548
atamajakki

atamajakki
  • Members
  • 323 messages
Gender =/= Sex. That's the core truth we need to operate from.

The Qun is a profoundly gendered society. But do we have any reason to suspect that they view gender as sex-derived? To a Qunari, "male" likely has more in common with "warrior" than it does with "penis."

#549
Super Drone

Super Drone
  • Members
  • 777 messages

Well, Joe. We are at an impass. I WANT my games to be art. I WANT my games to be inclusive.

To suggest otherwise is honestly offensive to me. I say we leave it at that. :/

 

Krem was inclusive. Iron Bull accepting Krem as a man was inclusive.

 

The Qun is not supposed to be a Utopian Society. Inclusivness doesn't mean every character in a work of fiction has to react overwhelmingly positive about the thing you are trying to increase awareness about. Thedas wasn't supposed to be a wish-fulfillment setting of Perfect Social Justice. It's a DARK FANTASY world, full of violence, racism, and bigotry. If inclusiveness NECESSITATES puppies-and-rainbows unilateral positvity even from the "Bad Guys", then the setting turns into something else.

 

And yes, I get that some people were always here for the LGBT content, and aren't actually interested in the Dark Fantasy. That's fair, I guess.


  • Icy Magebane, AzureAardvark et luism aiment ceci

#550
AzureAardvark

AzureAardvark
  • Members
  • 293 messages

The Qun is not supposed to be a Utopian Society.

 

Ding ding ding!  I enjoyed the Qun in DAO ... in DA2, I went through various stages of "lol wut?" ... and now in DAI I've become convinced the Qun is the Mary Sue of religion/philosophy/government.