129 réponses à ce sujet

[fizzypop]

7.

[Draining Dragon]

7/10.

1.5 points docked for general issues (balancing problems, boring MMO-style side quests, lack of essential features, and not enough main story content)
1 point docked for lazy console porting.
0.5 point docked for garbage multiplayer.

So it's good, but could have been so much more.

For perspective, I would give Dragon Age: Origins a 9/10 (exceptional), and Dragon Age 2 a 5/10 (painfully average).

[Chuvvy]

DAO 9/10

DA2 6/10

DAI 7/10

[Draining Dragon]

7/10 seems to be the most common score for DAI.

[Rawgrim]

A solid 7. The combat, the passive villain, and the excess of fetch quests, is what I am docking points for.

[Starkrei]

Well, to rate all three, I'd say something like this:

 

Dragon Age: Origins:      10

Dragon Age 2:                7,5

Dragon Age: Inquisition: 7,5

 

On the whole I like Inquisition better than 2 I guess, the only problem is that I actually think the combat in Inquisition is worse than in 2, and considering how much combat there is, that's pretty bad.

 

I mean the second game ruined much of the tactical feel of the combat with the waves of enemies, and here in Inquisition there aren't waves, so it should be better right?

 

No, not for me, considering the low amount of abilities you get, and what I feel is a much more streamlined approach to combat. For example: I can't prioritize my stat points in a way that gimps my damage but enables me to use plenty of spells or abilities in succession. And the whole 8 spells only thing, **** that. Seriously.

 

Also: The main story felt like it lasted for two hours tops, and I don't remember a single sidequest even now, just a few days after i finished it.

[Aesir26]

8/10

 

I haven't personally experienced any issues outside of graphical glitches but I did dock a point for the "That was it?" feeling at the end as well as another for the sheer amount of forgettable fetch quests to fill those areas they created.

 

DAO: 6.5/10 (the battle system bored me, please don't hurt me)

DA2- 5/10

[Tsunami Chef]

I would give it a 8.5/10 right now. I think if they fixed the banter bug along with the rest of the bugs that set this game back this game could easily be a 9.5 and one of the best games of the decade. Add on hopefully great DLC and I hope someday this game can be skyrim-esque in its longevity.

 

Despite only giving it an 8.5 I still have played 125 hours in the time since it's release...which is amazing for me. ME3 was my most played game of all time and i played it for a total of 180 hours (I did several playthrough months, even years later.) Despite the rough edges something about DA:I keeps me coming back, and looking forward to updates as well.

 

Edit: maybe DA:O i played more, but I played it on 360 and I dont have one anymore so can't remember/tell O_O.

[Mecha Elf]

overall according to my enjoyment of playing

DA:O: 9.5

DA2: 7

DAI: 8.5

 

DAI is fun but its execution isnt very well done, theres just something about the inquisitor themself that is more cardboard than Hawk. I do enjoy playing it however, and it will be in my top 5 games that i have ever played!

[DanielCofour]

DAO:9/10

DA2: 5/10

DAI:7.5/10.

 

I have no idea what you're smoking that you would give the latter two such high numbers... 

[Chari]

8/10 for non-PC and 7/10 for PC

+ Main story is amazing, companion quests are great, some big sidequests are fun and even those annoying little ones actually have stories and fill the lore with new information. Designs, graphics, style are beautiful. Companions are likeable and complex

- Fetch quests for the most part are MMO-type trash. PC controls are criminally terrible. Some story choices, changes, retcons are either weird or ridiculous. Companions are great but they don't feel as close as previous DA's did, mostly becayse often their personal quests are separate and they don't even really interact with each other with some awesome exceptions

[teh DRUMPf!!]

 DA:O/A: 8.

DA][: 6. Note: I actually enjoy this game better than its predecessor, though the rating is lower because it is inferior in... substance (for want of a better word).

*DA:I: 9.

 

*Pending further review. With BioWare games, I often rate them very highly upon first completion, but find more flaws upon further review which could pull the rating down a bit. Then again, I give bonus points for good DLC. I project that the vanilla game will get a final score of 8 from me, 7 if bugs are not adequately addressed, and 9 after necessary patches and all the DLCs.

[Arl Raylen]

DA: O - 9.5/10

 

Did not expect it to be so good. When I bought it I was like "this will be a good stopgap until ME2 comes out."

 

DA2 - 8/10

 

Ok yes, repeated caves blah blah. But I really liked Hawke and his companions, perhaps even more so than the ones in DA: O.

 

DA: I - 7/10

 

I would have given it a 10/10 if you asked me while I was still in the middle of my first playthrough, but now that I know the story in its entirety I have to dock one point for lack of choice and an anticlimactic end. Few and far between emotional responses dock another point. The open world had its pros and cons, but I dock one last point for the lame MMO sidequests that made me yearn for the stuff I had in Jade Empire/ Kotor, and heck, even Skyrim.

[bluebullets]

da:o - 8.5/10. great game. one of my favourites ever. Incredible character building and making me feel personally involved

 

da2 - 7/10.  rehashed small envi ornments, repetitiveness, but still had the character building andDA lore

da:i - 7.5/10 - tried to correct the wrongs of DA2, but had a lack of personal involvement and character/relationship building that i have come to expect from BW

[N7KnightSabre]

DA Origins: 9/10  

 

DA 2:  7.5/10  (Story was great but the way it was set up wasn't stellar { come to Kirkwall - wait a year, do the expedition - wait three years, fight Qunari threat - wait three more years,  etc.}, major damage came from recycled dungeons, inability to customize followers' equipment..)

 

DA Inquisition:  8/10  (Story was good but seemed too short, too many fetch quests, Not the best inventory system in the series)

[thebatmanreborn]

DAO 8.5
DA2 7.5
DAI 9.0

Combat, graphics, world best in series. Bugs were abundant. Also, the NPCs lack character. Too many fetch type quests. Still, best in series

DAA 8

[Mark of the Dragon]

The game would have been amazing if Bioware gave us everything they told us they would. As it stands I feel a bit lied to. Bioware talked about a lot of things that were plain not in the game.

 

I think Inquisition has the worst plot of any Bioware game I have played. Bioware is at its best when it is playing with its players emotions. However Inquisition felt like a cartoon in that, no matter what you do you cannot lose. Everytime you try to interfere with Corypheus's plans you always succeed and failure is impossible. That makes choosing different paths feel worthless because you know it wont change anything. Worst of all I never really felt fear for my companions or the main character. None of them can ever die in the game except one and his fate is totally your choice. That made it really hard to connect with the story on a personal level and was really disappointing overall. Corypheus is supposed to be this big bad magister villain and he was reduced to a cartoonish villain that fails at everything.

 

The worst thing about the game was that you can spend over a hundred hours building you inquisition and it changes nothing. Bioware was always marketing you as this up and coming leader but you spend all this time building an army to battle Corypheus and then you never lead it anywhere. You apparently use the army at one point but you character does not lead it into battle no instead you see a short cutscenes with you advisor's and then next think you know you and some of your companions are walking into a camp that is the start of that mission. It was completely anti-climactic and weak. The same can be said for the ending which was pretty pathetic not to mention static. No choices you make change anything about the ending. It makes it hard to go back to invest another one hundred and twenty hours when I know it will all be that same thing. 

 

As for choices having any consequences in this game. That was a joke. Almost nothing you do changes anything. A few choices from previous games effect war table missions but that's it and you can get a little cameo with whoever rules Fereldan. That cameo was so pointless I do not know why they even added it.

 

I am actually afraid that after all the critical acclaim Inquisition has got that they will continue to make bigger game worlds and focus less on there stories. I play these games for story and in that department Inquisition failed big time. Instead Inquisition was a want to be sandbox and the exact opposite of what I want in a Bioware game.

 

That is not to say it was all bad. Some of the underlying stories were great. The Flemeth reveal was awesome and the scene after the credits was pretty amazing and got me excited for the future. There were also some pretty epic moments but overall the game felt generic. I think what bugs me most is that there was so much potential with the storyline for Inquisition. There is so much that could have been done to make it better. Instead I feel like they just wrote one draft of the story, stuck it in the game and called it quits.

 

I would say the game is maybe a 7/10.

[Travie]

Please fix PC so I can play/10

[StingingVelvet]

I would give it a 6. Very large problems with quest design, filler content and worlds that look nice but have no actual depth. Also I thought the villain was pretty poor.

 

The combat and bigger quests are all good though, and the dialog is still mostly well written.

[dlux]

DA:O 9/10

DA2 6/10

DA:I 4/10

 

Yes, I think the game is terrible. It has numerous major design flaws and and tons of bugs.

[robertthebard]

I'd have to go 8.5-9/10. Some instability issues, and some PC related issues, but other than that, I've had a great time with it.

[JaneF]

4/10. 

 

Pros:

 

Decent graphics, and voice acting (when it rarely pops up)

Nice box art.

Big open world

Enjoyable crafting system

Varric

 

Cons:

 

Riddled with annoying bugs

Tedious side quests

Annoying colour shading that makes it hard to see loot you've dropped.

Insipid cookie cutter builds 

Godawful menu system

Inability to put stats where you want them.

Horrible, tedious, sleep inducing combat.

Not much variety in armors.

[Milan92]

9/10.