then why comment? Tp get a "rise out of people"
Because I pay the internet bill to speak my mind? I don't need the approval of others to do that.
In all honesty, a Chantry-Supervised Circle was *Always* going to lead to the whole powder-keg war.
Everything leads to war. The fact it took 1000+ years is a feat to brag about.
Most First/Senior Enchanters were Aequitarians anyways for pete's sake!
What does this have to do with anything?
Give Mages the Circles, sure. But Aequitarian's (The majority ruler of the Mage Fraternities) should govern them, Mages looking over other mages - so you don't get the Enchanter Orsino's covering up dangerous mages for fear of sparking Templar/Chantry ire.
That's what the Circles already were before everyone thought it'd be the best time to be stupid.
Think of someone like Irving, who was an exemplary Mage - whom Knight-Commander Gregior trusted the fate of the Entire Circle to, even he had to stoop to using you politically so that you guys could say "Nu uh, you Chantry Pricks guys screwed up too", when he could have directly intervened before things got out of hand.
Irving already lead the Circle. Hell, he even could order Templars around. I seriously doubt you actually looked at any of this before writing this rant, no offense.
The Aequitarian's foremost beliefs are using Magic to help man - with or without Chantry supervision. (Such as Anders running his clinic Pre-Chant-Splosion.)
Lol, Aequitarians believe in cooperation. Anders is not an Aequitarian. They do not believe in ignoring the Chantry anymore than say, a Loyalist, which is why they are traditionally allied with them.
There are always going to be mages who default to Blood Magic and using their powers to harm people. But putting those ticking timebombs under the control of (More often than not) abusers, only makes things start to deteriorate faster, and generally to the point where the only intervention is Tranquility or death.
That's why they are traditionally put to death. For endangering literally everyone around them. Just like there will always be people who try to murder each other. We don't remove the federal government because of that.
Hell, Tranquility was a punishment developed *By* Mages, *For* Mages, to keep themselves and other's safe from the same people who'd readily side with Coryphi-fish.
Not really. It was a system designed to nutter mages. That's about it really. It also has some really cool side-effects for mundanes, but mages can go ahead and leave this claim to fame behind.
When you get Circles (Like Kirkwall) using it illegally to silence naysayers, on harrowed mages, and frankly having bad form of imprinting them with Chantry Sun brands on their foreheads. You know something is wrong.
Kirkwall is definitely a representative of the Circle system, despite all evidence and claims to the contrary.
Templars like Cullen, Bariss, and Gregoir are amazing examples of what their duty *Should* Be - but for every Cullen, Bariss and Gregoir, there seem to be ten Meredith's, Ser Alrik's, and Ser Kerass'.
ower corrupts, but absolute power (Divine right under the Chantry), corrupts Absolutely.
Not really. I also like how you pulled from only one group of people. By the way, Meredith was pretty ignorant of the Order, ruling the City and all, up until she went insane. That's an entirely different issue that has next to nothing with her view of mages.
Good thing neither actually have this power, if you spent the time to actually read the Navarran Accord codex.