IMHO, Templars fit in right between the juggernaut-esque champion and the Sustained DPS Beast Reaver. They can be either off-tanks, or amazing
burst damage dealers. I dislike the idea of a templar tank because even though you are damn hard to kill and can deal some damage, balancing
between attack and defensive stats on your gear is what is going to get you. Because the champion can survive anything and everything while
dealing almost little damage (with tank build,) and because Reaver will out DPS you if you are built to tank as a templar. IMO, templars truly shine as
2H burst DPS's. With the right gear and build you can one-shot anything that is susceptible to physical effects on NM. Champion is basically the god-
tank that doesn't even have to worry about is guard meter breaking if the person is half-decent. They usually are pretty bad at damage dealing, but I
know somebody in this sub-forum made a thread about his 2H champion DPS build, which is worth a look. Hope this helps!
Being able to deal massive damage on your own is good don't take me wrong but it's not what a templar is about. You say being a sword and shield templar isn't good because you will not have optimal stats. While there is truth to that, it doesn't automatically mean that the overall dps would suffer and would only matter if you plan to go solo in which case the Champion fares better.
If you take the tanking route of the templar you can still hit for over 4-5k damage with WoH + SP combo and while that is not as high as the 2H version of like 8-10k you can fit an extra companion in the group since you won't need a dedicated tank. Cole will outdps your templar on anything outside WoH + SP (and even that is debatable) so it really depends on what you like. Personal efficiency or group efficiency.
Also while it is badass to wield a huge sword or axe the S&S talents are unfortunately vastly superior to the respective 2H ones, not to mention that 2H talents have broken detonators (Mighty Blow still does 1 extra damage from the detonation). You can still take Flow of Battle as a S&S warrior since passives are weapon agnostic.
Of course all of that accounts that you actually do use a dedicated tank and not your own 2H warrior with a dps spec in which case you are right, although that is not something I would recommend to someone who hasn't played warriors in the game for a long time.





Retour en haut







