I have already written that DA:O will move to at least spot 7 on the list BEHIND Wii Fit Plus at spot 5 if you combine platforms. With PC sales DA:O probably surpassed sales of Wii Fit Plus in November 2009.
What? Seriously? Why are you first challenging what I wrote and now suddenly adopting it?
Your posts are so inconsistent it is baffling.
Platform combined DA:O has a high spot on NPD's top 10 list for November 2009, as you have also just admitted (see above).
Platform combined DA:I is not on NPD's top 10 list for November 2014.
Conclusion: In a best case scenario DA:I is only selling slightly or mildly better than DA:O did. We don't have enough numbers to come to a more accurate conclusion ATM.
You're clearly confused. I'm not trying to tell you either that DAO did poorly or that DAI is doing well. That's a phantom argument you're having with someone who isn't me. What I'm telling you is that you can't draw the conclusions you think you can from the data.
Okay, now you have a cogent point: the DAO NPD list would have DAO in the combined top 10 without PC sales whereas DAI is not in the top 10 without PC sales. That's a (completely meaningless) inference that you can draw.
What you can't conclude is what that says about the sales, since DAO (again) sold at a sufficiently anemic rate to fall behind Wii Fit. DAO had weaker competitors - there's no gangbusters equivalent to Far Cry 4 or incredible handheld games like Pokemon. But let's somehow say that the difference in the market doesn't matter.
You say that DAO might surpass Wii Fit with PC sales. Probably. But we have 0 data on what DAI sold (with or without PC). We have 0 data on how close the top 10 list is right now. It could be in the top 10 - a more competitive top 10 with no knowledge of how much was sold of each game - or it couldn't me. And THAT is my point. That there's no real inference we can draw.





Retour en haut




