That's the problem with cherry picking, you inevitably miss the point. This is a primary reason to skip sites like MetaCritic though. You should note here: I don't care if the score is a 0 or a 10. I don't care if the reviewer works for a game review site, or lives in their mom's basement playing video games 24 hours a day, review sites can be completely ignored, including, as I mentioned in the part of the post you decided you didn't want to deal with, which games get GotY from whom. None of this has any relevance to me. You seem quite invested in it, but the reality of my situation is, I don't care. My tastes are defined by me. I'm not one of the sheep that needs someone else to tell me what I should or shouldn't like, what music I should or shouldn't listen to, or what publishers I should or shouldn't support. I make my choices based on how I feel about what's been presented.
That means that, for me, this game was purchased because I liked what I saw. My deal breaking condition didn't occur, MP is not tied to SP. I was hot and heavy in that debate, with the position that the reward for MP should be playing MP. I'm not happy with the controls for PC, but I already had a controller for AC and the Witcher 2, so I use it. I'm not happy with the skill limitations, especially on PC, the platform that I play, but I still wouldn't waste my time on MetaCritic, or any other review site, giving the game a 0. Of course, I'm also not upset that I couldn't play my Warden, or that my Warden wasn't an integral part of this game, especially given my love of the US ending. I chose to weigh this game based on it's own merits, and came away not only glad that I bought it, but glad that I pre-ordered it. So ultimately, I'm not worried about it's future, and the BioWare post in this thread didn't make me paranoid about them posting, it reinforced my position that the game is a solid entry into the franchise.
I'm darn sure of two things, one is that I never mentioned Metacritic. Not one word. I've been reading what people say about the game and in general people seem lukewarm towards it, which was something I did mention. I've seen very positive things said and very negative, but setting aside those who have technical issues, people seem to be having a hard time giving it glowing remarks. It's "ok".
The other thing I am sure of, is that it's not I who is invested in GOTY awards, rather I've been trying to explain why I don't see arbitrary GOTY awards as relevant at all.
"My tastes are defined by me" etc. and I agree with that. What the poster I've been debating with do not agree on is that he puts some intrinsic value in the fact that this game has received a number of GOTY awards. A meaningless fact to me.
So again: what are you exactly discussing with me? I'm asking in all seriousness, because there nothing in your post I disagree with.





Retour en haut





