Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to remember from a group behavior class that people tend to get more and more extreme to stake out leadership positions in like-minded groups.
The moderates tend to get out voiced by extremist from both sides.
That's exactly what I see on this board...bioware groupies and bioware haters get the most attention, and moderates who say, "Well, it was good, but X, Y, and Z could have been better," are largely ignored.
You hopefully had an excellent Sociology teacher, because that's usually how it works in any open forum (not just online ones). The Silent Majority is an old concept, though it's not always that way.
Like many others I'm taking a wait and see approach. I'll gauge things in a couple months, when we have definitive numbers (hopefully). For now the BW post reassured me.
Edit: Andraste_Reborn also brings up another point. Being vocal, kind/courteous and organized is usually the best way to get your voice heard. If enough people yell loud enough, then someone's bound to come check on what the screaming's about (likely in a bad mood). If a group of people are polite, and lay out their faults, and do so with rationality (in the board dedicated to it no less), then the ones who look at it will have a better understanding of what's desired, and are probably much more likely to listen to what's being asked.
Then it becomes a numbers game. Cost versus Time, and how will this affect all users, not just this group.