I don't get this idea that the Grey Wardens suffered character assassination in DA:I. The Warden's Keep DLC pretty much showed us that Wardens are willing to do pretty messed up things for whatever cause, and Sophia Dryden didn't even have Corypheus to blame.
It showed a few crazy extremists. I love how everyone uses that as the be all and end all of the wardens when you have plenty of in game evidence in DAI that there are others that didn't agree with what was being done or seemed to be going along more because they had to or felt they had to. Alistair is the warden for me instead of Stroud and he spoke up only to get chased around the map by them, most probably not even having a clue why.
The point behind them being willing to do whatever it takes had more to do with stressing how bad blights are. Just like them taking criminals because they need anyone that can be spared but can't conscript them all. It's an extreme group. They drink darkspawn blood and live with the taint only to die in the deep roads if not in the blight or some other horrid way. Being an idealist is all well and good but when a nation is ravaged for a century by a blight whatever it takes becomes a much more acceptable thing. Easy to sit back and judge when it's not reality but imagine if it were, if right now we were in the middle of a blight that had lasted a decade or even just five years. Would you not want there to be some group willing to do whatever it takes to end it? Or would you be 'no we have to hold onto our ideals' as everyone you know is dying and taint is everywhere and there is no end in sight.





Guest_starlitegirl_*
Retour en haut





