It seems Bioware may have been grinding an axe for her since she opts to ignore whatever the new Divine intends except for Freedom (Leliana) in which she still ends up building a mage conclave which may become a threat in future.
Which is precisely against a lot of what the Mages whom have seen what Uncontrolled Magic causes (Connor, Viv, several different former Apostates and Circle members)
Fiona comes off in DA: I as an incredibly selfish and incompetent leader that puts her own desires and vision of mages against the others (why in the Viv as Divine ending, a large bulk of the Mages outright disown her and walk away)
The confirmed (both by the books and in the game itself) majority of mages support Fiona and her visions on the freedom of mages. Of course she ignores whatever Cassandra or Female Montgomery Burns intend as new divines and only accepts Leliana, why would she accept what the other 2 offer when it goes against the majority of mages will and their rights?
Fiona comes off in DA:I as a great leader who had (and has) to take big hard choices in the past affecting her destiny and the destiny of the majority of mages yet is willing to do anything she is capable of if that means a better tomorrow for her kind and bears in mind over any other matter the safety of mages. If anyone plays the Mages side quest anyone can see that what "fucked off" everything is Alexius with his time magic (performed after your meeting in Val Royeaux with Fiona), changing the past promising Fiona safety for the weak mages and the children mages under the wing of the Tevinter Imperium. Because yeah, Templars kill innocent childrens too under their stupid justification of "what if...?"




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






