I don't promote religion. However, I do appreciate when others appear to more freely choose to follow a religion, but do so in a comparatively less harmful way than fundamentalism, and focus on good works that I regard good works. I'd never call it my ideal, but I do think it is a more free society than if I strictly enforced my atheism on everyone.
I pretty much agree with all of this (OH NO, NOT THINKING FOR SELF, *NODS HEAD*
).
This is even true when dealing with children and their parents. The parent may assuage themselves with good notions about telling the child things when they're 'ready', but their ability as the arbiter of 'when they are ready' is so often faulty that it is laughable. In the end, it is the parent's laziness why they don't tell (or at least translate downwards) the information about the world to a questioning child, and so I've seen it go with religion. The arbiters suck, and the organization is lazy, and there's not enough of a shared back and forth of questions and answers and communication, that the system stagnates and can barely adapt to anything.
I'm gonna stop before this goes far enough for locking.
Ah I see where you are going with it. I do agree. I have very little issues with those who are faithful, but don't necessarily subscribe to their church. I mean we see some great examples of that in DA games. Cullen and Cassie are both good characters that start to realize where the chantry has led them. In some ways starting to break those barriers and come out with a more clear understanding of the world in which they live. I appreciate Leilana in some ways because I think she actually wants to do good in the world, but relies so heavily on guidance instead of following her instincts. Really I can't blame her, her instincts are all messed up because of the abuse she suffered.
I definitely don't think anyone should be "forced" to be atheist or anything. I just think organized religion should be discouraged because it heavily leads to groups that can have pretty dang harmful outcomes. I don't doubt that qun or chantry wasn't established for a good reason, but hell is paved with good intentions. When you start putting in the idea of holy callings and events...well people get a little messed up in the head. That isn't to say it can't happen with countries or other communities because obviously we see that in Thedas too. The difference though is one happens in reality and the other defies it. It is much harder to prove a negative, that's what the chantry/qun are. That is far more likely to create the zealotry that will not end. While when it happens because the Orlesians are feeling frisky it is much easier to prove that it is indeed harmful because it is set in reality. We can see the cause and effect. We can see the outcome. While the outcome for religious zealotry is often delayed until it no longer matters, death. That kind of hard line makes it difficult to convince people to stop their behavior because ultimately they believe something better will happen to them. The only thing that can prove them wrong is death. Kind of hard concept to explain and I'm working off of pain killers, but I hope that makes sense.
Agree 100% about the parent thing. I'm so glad my parents were brutally honest with me, but yes you nailed exactly the issues I see with it are.