338 réponses à ce sujet

[katokires]

 While the reviews are so good to  the game. I do not understand why is there so much negative feedback while reviewers gave it so much positive feedback.

Reviewers have no compromise at all with the emotional investment players did with previous games in the franchise. It would be wrong if they did. Reviewers should just analyse technical aspects of the game and be fair in their judgement and as I do always admit, Dragon Age Inquisition is a marvelous game.

 

I could easily rate DAI as 10 out of 10, easily.

As a RPG 8/10

As a Bioware RPG 6/10

For PC 4/10

Considering DAO 2/10

Considering developers promises about this title  0/10

 

This explains it all

[DaemionMoadrin]

*snip*

 

Yeah, I get you. You are not wrong. For a more detailed response, please refer to my previous posts in this thread:

 

http://forum.bioware...rum/?p=18083879

http://forum.bioware...rum/?p=18085649

http://forum.bioware...rum/?p=18100823

http://forum.bioware...rum/?p=18274604

 

 

Others here have written some excellent and eloquent answers, too. One example:

 

http://forum.bioware...rum/?p=18102076

 

I do not have the energy anymore. Thanks.

[XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX]

Snip

This place really has an obsession with negativity no matter how good the game is, is always something to b*tch about by some people, especially certain PC players who wish BW would revert back to1998 & put 50% of the blame for their "downfall" on console players

[TEWR]

EL oh EL.

 

The reason there is so much Hate on the forums is because all the people who didn't Get "what they wanted exactly how they wanted it" Are on the forums whining about how " They didn't get what They wanted Exactly How They wanted it". 

 

Where as the other people who are enjoying it are doing Multiple play through's and only coming on the Forum to post bugs and things that need fixing then going back to playing the game.

 

Eh, you can hardly say posters operate on two extreme ends of the spectrum. There's a difference between criticism and pissbaby whining. I'm disappointed with Inquisition, but I'm replaying it still. I did the same thing with DAII -- disappointed, but I replayed.

 

I think the game was overhyped, just as DAII was. I think the combat is a mess and hardly tactical (never been DA's strong suit, yet the devs insist it is with each installment), the storyline suffers from a lack of cohesion and interesting elements the setting would have allowed for (for instance, with the Chantry in shambles different sects would arise, yet none do in game other then the one in the Hinterlands... which has no impact whatsoever on the game), Corypheus is allowed very little screen time, we succeed far too often so it diminishes the scope of the threat, etc.

 

If a person thinks someone can't call out a game's faults and still somewhat enjoy the game, even if they find it disappointing, then I think their head's been in the sand a bit too long.

[ExelArtz]

my biggest issue was the loot system rng is terrible, rewards for the things you do for side quests and the war table arent worth using,Why The F- would they give them as an award. if i have to save&load farm for an item i want for hours and still not get it theres something wrong, unique items may have awesome back story but they suck and useless compared to the items you make and not worth even selling you'll get nothing for the armor while belts and rings have sold for 1k, a few bugs that plagued dragon age origins still plague dragon age inquisition like when killing something and the size of it grows after death, a giant spider grow to the size that filled the screen and took me 20min to escape it.

there are other issues but nothing else i care to discuss

[katokires]

This place really has an obsession with negativity no matter how good the game is, is always something to b*tch about by some people, especially certain PC players who wish BW would revert back to1998 & put 50% of the blame for their "downfall" on console players

It is easy for you to understand these people, I am one of them, let me guide yoou through the marvelous world of ONLY STUPID PEOPLE THINK SOMEONE WANTS A GOOD GAME.

 

First I will try the simple way, then, if you don't understand I will try the harder way.

 

Simple way:

 

1.Le Bleu est une coleur chaude. A (comic?)book lesbian drama.

 

2.La vie d'Adèle or something like that was the movie based off the book mentioned above, HIGHLY fetichized but still have the same story, sort of...

 

3. If they used the same actresses to make a sequel movie mixing the Avengers and Sucker Punch it could be called Dragon Age Inquisition.

 

The thing is that A LOT OF PEOPLE would love this supposed sequel. I'm not saying this sequel would be bad but even if it was good, it would never be what people who read the book want. It is not about being good. No one goes to th theaters expecting Avengers 2 to be good, they go expecting Avengers to be Avengers. No one goes to the theater to watch Harry Potter expecting a good movie they expect Harry Potter.

 

So yeah, I get people who like good games. But I really don't understand these people not understanding people who want specific things. So I always resort to sexuality to see if people understand, sometimes being beautiful is not enough, sometimes you need a specific gender. Or even more specific, like eye or hair color. Can you please understand that hating Inquisition is not about it being a bad game but about it not being what we wanted? And contrary to what people here say, I, and many others, can tell exactly what we want, in detail so it is not about "you would criticize anything anyway"

[XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX]

Snip

Thats just the thing tho, BW gets hate no matter what, they try & give "what fans want" only to get abuse for it, romances as a good example of that, people hated on them for the "all bi" approach so BW brought back set sexuality, which then resulted in alot of hate & asking for DA2 style bisexual choices back, alot of people flip/flop about pretty much everything on here just so they can complain

[Chiramu]

The reviews kind of lied about the game, not mentioning some major issues that would make some fans of the series disapointed, to say the least.

Ign especially said how they cant distinguish between side quests and main quests and how all quest are superbly done while in reality most are generic mmo fetch quests.
in adition they praised the combat and strong rpg element which is also a big fat lie.


The forum is full of discussions of what went wrong and how to fix it if you feel like learning more.

 

To be fair, reviewers only have about a week before they have to write up their review. They cannot spend too much time going over the game before they have to get working, so reviewers will never see that much of games.

 

Inqusition was a game that got me into it, but it lost my interest half way through on the first play. The reviewers wrote what we all felt when we first entered the game.

[DaemionMoadrin]

Thats just the thing tho, BW gets hate no matter what, they try & give "what fans want" only to get abuse for it, romances as a good example of that, people hated on them for the "all bi" approach so BW brought back set sexuality, which then resulted in alot of hate & asking for DA2 style bisexual choices back, alot of people flip/flop about pretty much everything on here just so they can complain

 

Those aren't necessarily the same people though. Each group has their own expectations and will be vocal about them. I don't think the people who want more gay love interests and the people who do not want any gays in their game are the same.

 

DA2 love interests were "playersexual" at first and people were okay with that for the most part. Later David Gaider said they are all bisexual instead. *shrugs*

[Zobert]

Thats just the thing tho, BW gets hate no matter what, they try & give "what fans want" only to get abuse for it, romances as a good example of that, people hated on them for the "all bi" approach so BW brought back set sexuality, which then resulted in alot of hate & asking for DA2 style bisexual choices back, alot of people flip/flop about pretty much everything on here just so they can complain

 

Did people have a problem with "all bi" or did straight guys have a problem with Anders jumping them?

[XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX]

Did people have a problem with "all bi" or did straight guys have a problem with Anders jumping them?

Alot of people thought having 4 bisexual companions was "unrealistic" so it wasn't just the people who freaked out over a guy flirting with them

[DragonKill83]

In my opinion, "professional" reviewers do not usually get to spend near as much time with a game as a customer would.  I've logged over 120 hours into this game and still haven't advanced the storyline a huge amount, mainly because I like to explore around and around....and around...

 

That being said, I'm starting to get bored.  While there's a supposed overwhelming amount of side content to do, it is certainly beginning to get repetitive to the point that I'm wanting to advance the main story again.

 

The environments are beautiful, and there's been many times I've just dropped the controller to sit back and admire the scenery along with my party.  Whether it's standing on top of a hill in the Hinterlands, overlooking Winterwatch Castle from a distance, or scratching my head and pretending there's a huge mystery that doesn't really exist among the gigantic statues in the Storm Coast, there's a vast amount of beauty.

 

I will be disappointed if there is not some type of in-depth quest and dungeon/exploration zone to be added in a future DLC.  With PS4 systems able to handle 500 GB worth of data, this game could be unbelievably huge (even with the increased potential for glitches) and could give a player tens of hours worth of exploration in one of the most intricate and mysterious areas to explore that's ever been put into a video game.  The potential is there.....I just wish someone would show their personality a bit more.  There's many games out on the market that have a 'bland' and 'cookie-cutter' feel to them, and there are areas in Dragon Age :  Inquisition where I suddenly fall into a feeling of having only a modicum of dungeon exploration and truly unique places to visit.  90% of this game is spent above the surface, maybe more.

 

As per my previous posts, I want to see the Pyramids of Par Vollen added into an expansion DLC; maybe some more exploration into the Deep Roads.  I've also seen handfuls of places where dungeon entrances could be added into maps--either placed into the cuts of rock formations, wells that can be jumped down into, large statues that could have secret doors that lead down into stairways once they're opened, and much more.

 

I've heard people say "if you want a dungeon crawler, go buy X game."  Well, that might be true, but how many dungeon crawlers are created on the Frostbite engine like this?  Dragon Age:  Inquisition has a beautiful art palette, and I really wouldn't want to have it any other way.  I want to see this engine's graphical capability further utilized and explored.

 

That's all.  For now!

[TheTsar_]

EL oh EL.

 

The reason there is so much Hate on the forums is because all the people who didn't Get "what they wanted exactly how they wanted it" Are on the forums whining about how " They didn't get what They wanted Exactly How They wanted it". 

 

Where as the other people who are enjoying it are doing Multiple play through's and only coming on the Forum to post bugs and things that need fixing then going back to playing the game.

That's sort of how negative reviews happen lol... People who like something don't tend to post negative views on it, people who don't like certain aspects will post that they don't. It's also not like people are complaining about a wide range of issues, it's the same thing in most topics, which shows it's a design flaw, not a personal 'want' from the game. 

[Rawgrim]

Alot of people thought having 4 bisexual companions was "unrealistic" so it wasn't just the people who freaked out over a guy flirting with them

 

The complaint was that it was "unrealistic" that everyone just fell for Hawke by default, regardless of Hawke's gender.

[XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX]

The complaint was that it was "unrealistic" that everyone just fell for Hawke by default, regardless of Hawke's gender.

Not really, in my experience i mostly saw people saying "4 bisexual's in a group is unrealistic cos they're a minority" then started with the unpleasant "only Isabela is believable as being bi since she sleeps around, people like Merrill wouldn't be like that"

[DaemionMoadrin]

Not really, in my experience i mostly saw people saying "4 bisexual's in a group is unrealistic cos they're a minority" then started with the unpleasant "only Isabela is believable as being bi since she sleeps around, people like Merrill wouldn't be like that"

 

Well, no need to rehash that discussion. We're all glad it's in the past.

[Rawgrim]

Not really, in my experience i mostly saw people saying "4 bisexual's in a group is unrealistic cos they're a minority" then started with the unpleasant "only Isabela is believable as being bi since she sleeps around, people like Merrill wouldn't be like that"

 

More like 100 percent of every possible love interest a person can have, during a 7 year period, just happens to be bisexual. Those are quite the odds.

 

Merrill shouldn't be sleeping with anyone. She is 12 years old.

[Ryzaki]

More like 100 percent of every possible love interest a person can have, during a 7 year period, just happens to be bisexual. Those are quite the odds.

 

Merrill shouldn't be sleeping with anyone. She is 12 years old.

 

It's quite the odds that you'd get a pirate, bloodmage, abomination and lyrium experiment all together in one group as well.

[Thane4Ever]

To the folks that complain that Bioware "lied" to them in the pre-launch advertising campaign: you need to accept that gaming is big business and marketing is always going to be just that - marketing. They're going to play up the aspects they think you want to see even if they may be miniscule or not there at all, and/or they'll mask the parts they don't want you to know about yet. Content can and will get cut right before launch but may be included in the trailers. Bioware is not your trusted friend, they are a business, a business that needs to sell and market a product. For every customer that leaves in disgust, there are 10 other young gamers to take their place. It's a cruel world.  This is why I usually stay away from watching too many pre-launch trailers and the general hype machine.

[Rawgrim]

It's quite the odds that you'd get a pirate, bloodmage, abomination and lyrium experiment all together in one group as well.

 

Quite right. Didn't have much say in that one, though. Everyone was forced on me.

[presidentroh]

My opinion is that people disappointed because they expected DAO, not DAI.

[Ryzaki]

Quite right. Didn't have much say in that one, though. Everyone was forced on me.

 

To be fair you could decline the lyrium experiment and pirate.

 

(Not sure why bloodmage was forced. That was dumb.)

[TheTsar_]

To the folks that complain that Bioware "lied" to them in the pre-launch advertising campaign: you need to accept that gaming is big business and marketing is always going to be just that - marketing. They're going to play up the aspects they think you want to see even if they may be miniscule or not there at all, and/or they'll mask the parts they don't want you to know about yet. Content can and will get cut right before launch but may be included in the trailers. Bioware is not your trusted friend, they are a business, a business that needs to sell and market a product. For every customer that leaves in disgust, there are 10 other young gamers to take their place. It's a cruel world.  This is why I usually stay away from watching too many pre-launch trailers and the general hype machine.

No, not really.. Advertising something that isn't in the game which then directly effects sales is called False Advertising, something EA have only just scraped by with Mass Effect 3. Not that it's anywhere close to that in DA:I, just pointing out that you're wrong in assuming they can basically lie. 

[Saphiron123]

People tend to sound nitpicky on forums, it's a great game (or I wouldn't be playing it)... but there are some issues, and this is a feedback forum, so more negatives will be voiced then positives.

Still, loving the game, hating the fetch quests, miss my tactics, and wish my qunari had a change of pajamas (because he looks silly).

[Thane4Ever]

No, not really.. Advertising something that isn't in the game which then directly effects sales is called False Advertising, something EA have only just scraped by with Mass Effect 3. Not that it's anywhere close to that in DA:I, just pointing out that you're wrong in assuming they can basically lie. 

Are they going to be sued for false advertising?  Has that ever happened?  In Origins they had the Warden with glowing eyes in the trailers and that wasn't in the game and an armor on Leliana that wasn't available until mods.  They have a lot of leeway in marketing.