The Audacity of game companies is very strange.
1) You bring a beta game at full price on the market.
2) With respect to equipment, game length and control you have lied to us.
3) The game is not playable for many buyers (CTD, DirectX, etc)
4) The patch2 and Hotfix has made everything worse.
5) BIOWARE and EA wraps himself in creative silence as with ME3.
6) Fix No problems! Getting Bioware nothing better to do than nonsensical and overpriced DLC's on the market. A good joke!
I have the choice to spend even more money on an unfinished S....
Are you insane?
So, me enough! One month after the release of the game is still unfinished and you get nothing but crappy DLC's.Does what you want. No respect for buyers, not respect for BIOWARE!!!
You're either become incapable (which I doubt) or the shareholders interested you more than the paying customer.
You and the other manufacturers have milked us long enough, but slowly it's time to show you who rules the world!
There is a joke that a loss for words!
It is also interesting in the forums where DA: I is offered illegally, the players do not have this problems. Are the Denuvo or DRM the problem?
F... the buyer or I have to understand that?
Honestly I am disappointed with Inquisition but I don't think there's any reason to be this angry over everything. y'know. Relax a little have a little faith in Bioware, maybe try and give some constructive criticism. Point out what they did well, point out what they did poorly and perhaps offer suggestions of what they could have done better. It's easier to listen to constructive criticism than it is to have someone yell at you for everything you did wrong, and the suggestions might give ideas for what we could see to fix some of the problems either with inquisition now or in a future Dragon Age game. Part of the problem is that Bioware keeps overcompensating for everything, If we try and give some more level headed and constructive responses as opposed to constantly being aggressive and angry over what we view as 'wrong' or 'poorly done' it might help gauge the level of importance and disappointment towards certain features in perspective. Afterall, the loudest voices are usually the ones giving the most negative or harsh opinions.
1. Yeah. no I can somewhat agree with this, It's buggy as hell and unplayable for some people, Even patch 2 for a while broke more than it fixed. This said, Kudos for the fast hot patch, but Bioware needs to let us know they're working on it ASAP. Communication guys! This said they probably eliminated far more bugs than we know of during alpha and beta testing. They're not exactly working with a familiar or friendly engine.
2. Alright explain what you mean by equiptment and controls. I get that pc controls kind of suck but really once you get use to them the lack of response time in game (particularly for rogues) is what hurts more than anything. This might be because the controls are somewhat similar to my controls setup for Neverwinter and WoW when I played with a touchpad. As for game length the main story should take 20-40 hours if you're rushing. Doing the more interesting side quests (The main storyline of various areas, particularly crestwood, Capturing keeps, companion stories ect) should tack on at least another 20 hours. So honestly 40-60 hours isn't that bad for a fairly rushed play, especially since you should also play each major event where you take a side multiple times so you can experience all the content. There's also multiplayer if you can stand some of its instability which can add in a few more hours. I'm nearing 200 hours of time racked up, and honestly for the amount I paid for it? That's some pretty fair priced amusement.
3. This I can agree with. Patch 2 did however fix this for some people. That said it also broke it for a few others (I've had way more crashes since patch 2.)
4. Patch 2 yes. The hotfix? Not so much, more than anything it fixed the wonky issues that patch 2 brought on. anything the hotfix may have caused can overall be forgiven for the amount of stuff it fixed given the amount of time there was to work on it.
5. Elaborate on this, please. I'm not exactly sure what you're saying here.
6. Actually the DLC they did release (and once again it was a free DLC) fixed a few issues with multiplayer. Overall less multiplayer games are screwed up due to a bug (such as a key failing to drop) and its way more fun to have more variety in enemies. I mean I tanked a Giant with a keeper running a support/survival set up. Do you know how fun that is? I'm having a blast with my keeper, Its great to see how much more successful most of the runs are when I'm playing that as opposed to a damage. It's also great to have a support type character option. It's no spirit healer but it makes me miss the spirit healer a little less. Now that multiplayer has some variety I'd like to see another patch done before they start working on more things, but overall I really don't see what your point is here.
I can agree that the amount of DLC a lot of games have lately is getting ridiculous however. When I drop 60 or 70 bucks for a game (which I rarely do now. Usually I wait till the price drops + a sale or until I can get an ultimate edition cheap) I don't want to be buying half of the game. Right now I feel inquisition ended on a poor note, as we have a cliffhanger and with Bioware's changing protagonists it feels like our inquisitor did not get a proper ending. This is somewhat understandable if the inquisition is going to be a part of the next game for one reason or another, But I don't particularly like the idea of running into my old protagonist. Especially with the whole Adamant scenario in this game. I hope something can be done to address this that doesn't make it feel like I'm paying to see the game's ending, but unfortunately I'm a little iffy on that being a possibility.





Retour en haut







