Aller au contenu

Photo

Restore Bisexual Cullen.


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
1051 réponses à ce sujet

#226
eyezonlyii

eyezonlyii
  • Members
  • 1 715 messages

But how does that apply to mods? Or mods regarding character sexuality.

 

Veeia - thank you! I truly had no idea.

 

 

when someone said offensive mods I immediately thought of White Isabela so that's what I was talking about!

definitely mods like that



#227
Thiefy

Thiefy
  • Members
  • 1 986 messages

Again, you stated that restoring the content would show bi and homosexual male fans that they matter. Tell me exactly why you think those fans matter less to Bioware.

I don't think they matter less.

 

I think they are disappointed at the choice Bioware made. I think supporting the restored content would show solidarity with them.

Or is there something else you are trying to get at with the "what I think Bioware thinks" angle?



#228
Hanako Ikezawa

Hanako Ikezawa
  • Members
  • 29 692 messages

 

Yeah but the backlash against those mods means only a total jag is gonna do it. Popular opinion matters, even if it won't stop the whitewashing mods, it contextualized them by making them shameful and bad, not just a thing that happens.

I know, but the people who use them couldn't care less. They were who I was referring to. 

 

There were mods making Alistair gay. I think there were two. They were fairly popular IIRC and there was no backlash. I guess that wasn't whitewashing because whitewashing is only when someone gay is made straight? Honestly asking here. I've never heard this term before and I have a gay brother. I guess we're too old for some of these terms or he's never said them around me.

Whitewashing is when someone takes a character who is a person of color and makes them white. 

 

As for the Homosexual Alistair mods, yeah let's not bring that up. The double standard in some people's reactions to mods is infuriating. Mods that make Alistair Theirin available for homosexual romances is seen as perfectly fine to some people, but those same people blow a gasket at the mods that make Samantha Traynor available for heterosexual romances. 


  • shedevil3001, Bellanaris88 et eyezonlyii aiment ceci

#229
eyezonlyii

eyezonlyii
  • Members
  • 1 715 messages

 

 

I know, but the people who use them couldn't care less. They were who I was referring to. 

 

Whitewashing is when someone takes a character who is a person of color and makes them white. 

 

As for the Homosexual Alistair mods, yeah let's not being that up. The double standard in some people's reactions to mods is infuriating. Mods that make Alistair Theirin available for homosexual romances is seen as perfectly fine to some people, but those same people blow a gasket at the mods that make Samantha Traynor available for heterosexual romances. 

 

it always comes down to the representation issue. the "it's ok because there's less for us" mentality.



#230
Monica21

Monica21
  • Members
  • 5 603 messages

I don't think they matter less.

 

I think they are disappointed at the choice Bioware made. I think supporting the restored content would show solidarity with them.

Or is there something else you are trying to get at with the "what I think Bioware thinks" angle?

 

Well, then you might want to edit your post.

 

The choices Bioware made are because of lack of resources, and that's really it. And solidarity is, again, more hyperbole. You have romance options. You just don't have Cullen. And what on earth are you getting at with your last sentence?



#231
Greetsme

Greetsme
  • Members
  • 510 messages

Do you have any idea how videogame production process works? I mean, you obviously don't, but yeah. Wow.

the person responsible for animating romance scenes with Dorian was not the person building the battle system like lmao come on

I mean srsly this is a troll right?

I'm gonna go with that. Hahahah you're hilarious. Good one. Almost got me there.

 

Oh, I'm sorry, I never realized that you were Bioware staff, and have day to day communications with the developers.

You obviously don't have the faintest clue as to what it is that I am trying to convey.  Luckily I do.



#232
Grieving Natashina

Grieving Natashina
  • Members
  • 14 554 messages

Edit: I'm going to just bow out here.   :) 


  • daveliam aime ceci

#233
SurelyForth

SurelyForth
  • Members
  • 6 817 messages

If those aspects of the character are never explored, then it is more of a fair game to expand on that since they aren't altering anything about the character but adding. It'd be like giving Cole a sexual orientation by having him become interested in guys and/or girls if

Spoiler

 

I'm more referring to characters where those aspects are disclosed but then are changed for whatever reason. For example since you brought him up, Donald Duck. Donald's love interest is Daisy Duck. It's been this way since 1940. But say that for whatever reason, someone decides to change Donald to being interested to males. That person has altered an aspect of the character, which is not something I and I hope most people would approve of.

 

To bring it back to Cullen, regardless of their intentions for him Bioware promoted, sold, and handled Cullen as a heterosexual male. Changing that post-release is altering his character. It'd be different if handled like Kaidan where the ability to romance happens in different games. But if they did this to Cullen in DAI, it'd be like making Miranda interested in women in ME2 when she was promoted, sold, and handled as a heterosexual woman in that game.

 

Just because a person has only been seen in heterosexual relationships, or only engages in a relationship with someone of the opposite sex during a certain period of their life, does not make them straight. If Donald and Daisy broke up and Donald started seeing David Duck, that would not be an undermining of his character or a change of who he is. It just means he probably liked men and women all along, but was happy with Daisy.

 

And Cullen was not sold as a straight love interest, he was offered as a love interest to women only. I would argue that it is wonky to change the timeline, such that it is, in order to incorporate the bisexual content in DAI proper, but him not wanting to be involved with a man during the span of Inquisition does not mean he's straight and BW deciding to patch it in would not be a violation of anything because neither they nor Cullen have set his sexual boundaries in such a way to preclude an attraction to men.


  • JadePrince aime ceci

#234
Thiefy

Thiefy
  • Members
  • 1 986 messages

Well, then you might want to edit your post.

 

The choices Bioware made are because of lack of resources, and that's really it. And solidarity is, again, more hyperbole. You have romance options. You just don't have Cullen. And what on earth are you getting at with your last sentence?

If someone belonging to that particular community thinks I should edit it, I'll be more than happy to.

 

Saying that wanting to support my fellow male Cullenites is somehow exaggerated is petty as hell. I've looked forward to his romance for a while - even when I was an Alistair girl back in 2009. Why is it so odd to think I empathize with them and their disappointment? Yes bisexual and homosexual men have romance options - and Cullen could have been one of them, on their preferred gender. As fans, it's something we could have shared in common.

 

Is there a problem with me saying I think it would be a GOOD thing if Bioware went in this direction? Because that's literally all I've been saying.



#235
Guest_starlitegirl_*

Guest_starlitegirl_*
  • Guests

As for the Homosexual Alistair mods, yeah let's not bring that up. The double standard in some people's reactions to mods is infuriating. Mods that make Alistair Theirin available for homosexual romances is seen as perfectly fine to some people, but those same people blow a gasket at the mods that make Samantha Traynor available for heterosexual romances. 

 

 

As I'm learning here when I said I wanted Dorian as a straight option, this sort of thing has deeper ramifications. I was not suggesting that someone who is gay should have the gay scrubbed out of him but it was taken that way. I was saying I liked his character and wanted to romance him. I have a gay friend who is an amazing guy. I joke with him that I wish he liked women so we could be a couple. He jokes with me that he wishes I were a gay male so we could be together like that. It's our thing. We don't take it very seriously and he never thinks I mean it as me not accepting him as he is but I guess with some people it would come across like that even those I adore him to bits and accept him as he is. He doesn't care either. I was a little stunned that people took my comment that way but I'm late 30s so I guess things have changed or maybe my brother and my friend know me well enough to know I'm not implying they should change. It's the last thing I'm implying. It's no different than wanting an option for Cullen before it even existed. It's just such a sensitive topic that people might see it in a way it is not implied. In the case of Sam, her gayness was seen as removed.

 

Now in all fairness, I can see how some might feel this is a horrible thing because this is basically what the gay community lives with, the sense that others want to remove this from them and make them be like everyone else as if it were something wrong when it is not something wrong, it's just a far smaller percent of the population is this way. It's just another part of nature. So I get where that comes from except she's not actually a real person. I don't think people would (or any decent person would) imply or think that someone should remove their sexual orientation in that way. I think the part that is surprising to some of us is that it is a game character and we know that. We would never expect or want to change an actual person, but it seems that once a character is gay that is something that should not be altered. Rather than seeing how that was a great character that so many liked they wanted to romance it's seen as trying to change that person's nature. I guess I'm too old to get this part because I'm fairly certain it's still a character in a game and nobody is suggesting this should be done to LGBT people, but they do still feel this way and so it become a personal attack I guess.


  • veeia aime ceci

#236
Monica21

Monica21
  • Members
  • 5 603 messages

If someone belonging to that particular community thinks I should edit it, I'll be more than happy to.

 

 

Okay. Last time. If you don't intend to say that Bioware thinks that bi and gay male fans don't matter, then don't say so. The lack of me being in "that particular community" has nothing to do what your statement. You said that Bioware, regardless of the romantic content that's already in the game specific to gay and bi male fans, needs to reincorporate Cullen's bi content to prove that bi and gay male fans "matter." Your words. If Bioware thought that fanbase didn't matter, then there wouldn't be any gay or bi content.



#237
Panda

Panda
  • Members
  • 7 500 messages

If mods want to mod him as bisexual, I think other player's opinions won't matter in the slightest to them. Otherwise the mods found to be offensive would have stopped years ago. 

 

The point is that I don't think those mods should be found offensive.


  • veeia aime ceci

#238
dgcatanisiri

dgcatanisiri
  • Members
  • 1 752 messages

The point is that I don't think those mods should be found offensive.

 

I think that in a perfect world, either should be offensive. BUT we do not live in that perfect world. Right now, headcanons and fanfic and fanart and, yes, mods are how non-straight consumers of all media are most likely to find that representation. These reinterpretations have a long history of being the only way to provide that representation, those mirrors. And even if you want to argue that, on the basis of Inquisition offering options and having a few references of side characters who are in same-sex relations, Inquisition is a shining beacon of representation, it is still a drop in the bucket compared to the overflowing amounts of straight and assumed straight characters throughout media.

 

Until that scale begins to balance, when media across the board is giving us non-straight characters of all types on a basis enough that they're entirely normalized, where people who aren't heterosexual or gender-conforming are not unsafe for the crime of existing, we're not in that perfect world of representation. So in the world we live in today, right now, yes, modding straight characters to be bi is different from the other way around. When that day of normalization comes, then these mods would be just as offensive either way, but we're a long way off from that day right now.


  • AEve1, veeia et (Disgusted noise.) aiment ceci

#239
Uhh.. Jonah

Uhh.. Jonah
  • Members
  • 1 661 messages
my heart can't take this
  • (Disgusted noise.) aime ceci

#240
(Disgusted noise.)

(Disgusted noise.)
  • Members
  • 1 839 messages

I think that in a perfect world, either should be offensive. BUT we do not live in that perfect world. Right now, headcanons and fanfic and fanart and, yes, mods are how non-straight consumers of all media are most likely to find that representation. These reinterpretations have a long history of being the only way to provide that representation, those mirrors. And even if you want to argue that, on the basis of Inquisition offering options and having a few references of side characters who are in same-sex relations, Inquisition is a shining beacon of representation, it is still a drop in the bucket compared to the overflowing amounts of straight and assumed straight characters throughout media.

 

Until that scale begins to balance, when media across the board is giving us non-straight characters of all types on a basis enough that they're entirely normalized, where people who aren't heterosexual or gender-conforming are not unsafe for the crime of existing, we're not in that perfect world of representation. So in the world we live in today, right now, yes, modding straight characters to be bi is different from the other way around. When that day of normalization comes, then these mods would be just as offensive either way, but we're a long way off from that day right now.

This is more or less my opinion on the matter. I understand why some people view it as hypocrisy since we're talking about Dragon Age which is one of the most LGBT inclusive media franchises in history, but if you took every LGBT character in all of fiction and compared it to all of the straight characters in all of fiction, the LGBT ones wouldn't even be a fraction of one percent. They probably wouldn't even be 0.001%. So, yes, taking away one of those fractional decimal points is inherently different than taking one from the super majority on the other hand. You've still got more straight characters, in fact, you have more straight characters than anyone could ever mod, or write slash fic about, or even headcanon as queer. You've got almost the entirety of human history and art to keep drawing from, but queer people don't. That's the difference and that's why people get touchy about the possible Dorian and Sera mods but don't have problems with the Alistair mod. You don't have to agree with it, but it's not an irrational distinction to make.


  • NorwegianPirate, JadePrince et AEve1 aiment ceci

#241
Panda

Panda
  • Members
  • 7 500 messages

I think that in a perfect world, either should be offensive. BUT we do not live in that perfect world. Right now, headcanons and fanfic and fanart and, yes, mods are how non-straight consumers of all media are most likely to find that representation. These reinterpretations have a long history of being the only way to provide that representation, those mirrors. And even if you want to argue that, on the basis of Inquisition offering options and having a few references of side characters who are in same-sex relations, Inquisition is a shining beacon of representation, it is still a drop in the bucket compared to the overflowing amounts of straight and assumed straight characters throughout media.

 

Until that scale begins to balance, when media across the board is giving us non-straight characters of all types on a basis enough that they're entirely normalized, where people who aren't heterosexual or gender-conforming are not unsafe for the crime of existing, we're not in that perfect world of representation. So in the world we live in today, right now, yes, modding straight characters to be bi is different from the other way around. When that day of normalization comes, then these mods would be just as offensive either way, but we're a long way off from that day right now.

 

Well since the whole game and canon doesn't change with mods I don't think mods erase representation, they mostly alter game for those who decide the use them. I get that there isn't lot of representation but if someone wants to romance character in either way in the game with mod it doesn't bother me. However I think the white skin mods are different since the motivation is often rather racist instead of just wanting to romance your favorite character and remove "gating".


  • john-in-france, CuriousArtemis et Rainbow Wyvern aiment ceci

#242
Guest_starlitegirl_*

Guest_starlitegirl_*
  • Guests

This is more or less my opinion on the matter. I understand why some people view it as hypocrisy since we're talking about Dragon Age which is one of the most LGBT inclusive media franchises in history, but if you took every LGBT character in all of fiction and compared it to all of the straight characters in all of fiction, the LGBT ones wouldn't even be a fraction of one percent. They probably wouldn't even be 0.001%. So, yes, taking away one of those fractional decimal points is inherently different than taking one from the super majority on the other hand. You've still got more straight characters, in fact, you have more straight characters than anyone could ever mod, or write slash fic about, or even headcannon as queer. You've got almost the entirety of human history and art to keep drawing from, but queer people don't. That's the difference and that's why people get touchy about the possible Dorian and Sera mods but don't have problems with the Alistair mod. You don't have to agree with it, but it's not an irrational distinction to make.

 

I'm sorry that you don't have more representation but from where I'm sitting, I've seen a lot of progress in two decades and here I sit with people being angry with no idea at the progress that has been made. Is it enough? Hell no. Should it be more? Hell yes. But taking a stance that says it's wrong to make a gay character straight with a mod or fan fiction but it's okay to do it for a hetero character is not going to win hearts and minds on this one. I don't know your age but I know I watched this for two decades plus. I've seen my brother married. I watched him get partner healthcare a decade and a half ago which was sadly taken away this last year or so ago due to current health care changes. I've seen him go from having to be hush on his orientation to working for a massive organization that is largely hetero and he can be openly gay without it mattering at all. AT ALL. And even here, you have a game that is giving you representation (and yes there should be more of them that do) and what is your reaction? It is this you cannot take a gay character that you like and fantasize them as straight for your liking but we can make heteros gay because there aren't enough? That stuff doesn't win hearts and minds and believe me that's what you have to do because the problem is that people still see the negative. It was the normalization that helped.

 

Back in the 80s when people were blaming gay men for aids (which was not pretty believe me and I was a tot but saw enough that it left an impression on me) anyone who was overtly gay faced hell. Over time more gay people were less overtly gay and by that I mean they didn't behave in stereotypical ways. Not that this was normal but for many years it was more common. This was disconcerting to people who were still grappling with the whole gay/not gay issue and rumors around aids along with religious issues just to name a few things. There was also the whole ignorant group that decided it could be caught and gays needed to be weeded out and segregated. I've seen that crap as well. And the only thing that really helped was to not go extreme on things. I've even seen in the gaming forums. People ranting about a few groups that are going for more rights in different ways. These things don't help. You think they help but what helps is giving people time to adapt while speaking your minds and not taking extreme stances.

 

I've seen more than I can remember and one thing I can say for sure is most people who come across something where it's okay to mod cullen but not to mod Dorian will walk away with a negative impression. You may not care about that or you might want that but a negative impression does not help your cause. It sets it back.

 

I'm sure I'll be hated for stating the truth but I've seen a damn lot of change over a few decades and much of it was made when things were calmer because people (the people who need to be convinced the most) felt 'maybe I was wrong' as there was nothing out there to make them believe they were right.


  • Hanako Ikezawa et eyezonlyii aiment ceci

#243
WindFury

WindFury
  • Members
  • 95 messages

Patch in bi Cullen, patch in bi Harding - everyone`s happy :ph34r:


  • Andraste_Reborn aime ceci

#244
john-in-france

john-in-france
  • Members
  • 2 091 messages

I think that Bioware did a marvellous job of representing all tastes within the romances. 

They have also given us 22 different inquisitors (both sexes, all races and types) not even including the specialty skills. How you play those characters is your choice, as is the choice not to play certain ones. However Bioware has provided the option to do so.

 

I support representation of all romantic tastes in games, but that also includes heterosexual ones.

 

So:

 

I support a mod or DLC for bisexual Cullen.

I DO NOT support patching the game, as this would likely lead to issues with the heterosexual romance presently included.

 

Please remember that often Bioware records lines that are never used (Tali/Femshep and Thane/Maleshep), but that their final choice of story arc for that person may not use them. They may have logical reasons for this - future game or DLC that we are not aware of, so please be respectful with their choice.


  • MelissaGT, shedevil3001 et Monica21 aiment ceci

#245
Andraste_Reborn

Andraste_Reborn
  • Members
  • 4 827 messages

Patch in bi Cullen, patch in bi Harding - everyone`s happy :ph34r:

 

I don't think this will happen, but Maker, I wish it would. The best of all possible worlds!



#246
DameGrace

DameGrace
  • Members
  • 158 messages

Until that scale begins to balance, when media across the board is giving us non-straight characters of all types on a basis enough that they're entirely normalized, where people who aren't heterosexual or gender-conforming are not unsafe for the crime of existing, we're not in that perfect world of representation. So in the world we live in today, right now, yes, modding straight characters to be bi is different from the other way around. When that day of normalization comes, then these mods would be just as offensive either way, but we're a long way off from that day right now.

 

I'm afraid that day will never come as long as there are people who hate people different from them just because the latter exist... and as long as there are people who think "it's okay because we are less represented, but it's not okay because you've had your share". 



#247
WindFury

WindFury
  • Members
  • 95 messages

I don't think this will happen, but Maker, I wish it would. The best of all possible worlds!

 

Realistically i don`t think it will happen either, but, you know, Christmas. miracles and stuff. I do think it would be awesome.

 

I DO NOT support patching the game, as this would likely lead to issues with the heterosexual romance presently included.

 

Er, what kind of issues? I just can`t think of any? I don`t think anybody wants to remove any heterosexual romance content.



#248
ZawiszaTheBlack

ZawiszaTheBlack
  • Members
  • 108 messages

Guys, I'm following this thread all the time, reading all of your suggestions and opinions. DLC would be good, but if they ever made it - it will be really big and not cheap, I think. I remember this big storm after ME3 endings very well. I was one of these disappointed gamers. Ofc BioWare see there is a big issue with Cullen's bisexuality, but not that big like ME3 endings.
I'm not sure how long we will have to wait for mods or if we even ever get any, because Frostbite seem to be mod-unfriendly.
 

I'm afraid that day will never come as long as there are people who hate people different from them just because the latter exist...


I don't think it's about hatred against LGBT.



#249
DameGrace

DameGrace
  • Members
  • 158 messages

I don't think it's about hatred against LGBT.

 

Well, the person I was quoting mentioned 'where people who aren't heterosexual or gender-conforming are not unsafe for the crime of existing' describing the world we have now as opposed to the world we should have, that's why I said that as long as there are haters we won't get that perfect world. 

 

Personally, I prefer to be consistent. If I think that changing characters skin colour from white to non-white (I've seen the gorgeous art of a person who changed Disney characters' nationalities) is okay, then I should think the same for changing their skin colour from non-white to white. If I find making homosexual characters heterosexual offensive, then I should think the same for vice versa. And I do think so. 

 

As for Cullen - there is no confirmation yet that he was supposed to be bisexual or that he is bisexual. If someone makes the mod making him available to male characters - honestly, regardless of whether I find it offensive, it's not something to rant about. After all, people have a right to wish for something. 



#250
Guest_starlitegirl_*

Guest_starlitegirl_*
  • Guests

 

I'm afraid that day will never come as long as there are people who hate people different from them just because the latter exist... and as long as there are people who think "it's okay because we are less represented, but it's not okay because you've had your share". 

 

 

I don't think it's so much as you've had your share as it might be that there is the statistical reality of a population to consider. By this I mean that gay people do not represent even 50% of the population. 25% might even be a bit high here but possibly not. Now if let's say books and media were all do have 50% of the characters be gay, the reality is that because people generally know this is not normal it would, sadly, be seen as a gay show. One instance where this didn't not happen was Will & Grace. If it becomes seen as a 'gay' show or movie or book then that fails to give the true representation you would want which means it would likely become popular among the gay population but among the heterosexual population it might fail. It's failure there means less of this product would sell as that is mainstream america which represents a huge part of the buying public. Less money means less made. So if you want full representation across the media there is this risk that if it is not somewhat within the statistical margins of what would be considered normal that could work against it and you fail to get the representation you desire because it does not do well in the market which is a key factor in much of this. Sad I know but still true. And to be represented more overall it needs to be successful in mainstream. That's why movies that are more than 50% women become chick flicks. Depending on what they are they might do well on that point or worse. It becomes a key factor in making or breaking a product's sales and this is with 50% of the population or roughly that being women. So there is this balance that needs to be struck or people who are less open minded will tune out and those are still enough that you want them to tune in. Those are the ones that need to be slowly swayed to get over their narrow-mindedness which takes time and a very casual and nonaggressive approach or else they will stick to their closed minds and that will not help. Those are the targets. Yes, you are doing this for yourselves so that you are represented for yourself but TPTB will tread with caution when the almighty dollar is at stake and they will be careful not to alienate the majority base of their consumers. I know it sucks but that's how business is so it has to be something that happens in a way that seems natural. More characters that are gay or at least bi to start with are incorporated into shows and movies, novels and games and they are incorporated in ways that are not negative or disparaging and from there with each success more and more this becomes normal but it happens slowly and without a lot of fanfare. I think Buffy was the first show to have an openly gay relationship. Now it's more common though still not common enough. Sadly progress is slow but now a person cannot disparage homosexuality without getting called out harshly for it. A decade ago they could or maybe a decade and a half ago they could. To me, that is progress. To those dealing with it probably not much but I look at these things and I see change. I've seen so much progress that I know as upset as many are about this, there will be a day when you'll look back as I do now and see how far you've come for today.

 

I wish I could give people the hope I have based on what I've seen. I know it will continue to only get better. I know people here feel oppressed and unrepresented or ignored and dismissed. I saw that with my brother and I watched him go through that for so many years. It broke my heart to see him like that, feeling as he put it like the 'oppressed gay male' who was frustrated and angry. It got better and you will all see it get better as well. Hopefully now changes will happen even faster. They were slow to start but now there is momentum which is good.