We're just teasing you about your utopian order that we all feel is sure to end in a dystopia. That's why I recommended Psycho Pass, its an anime that's basically about your very idea. Only on a national scale.
How do we tackle on line bullying?
#326
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:08
#327
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:09
I do realize that. But due to the lack of alternatives, I picked the lie detector as an answer.
I'm opinionated, I get that, But I'm also very open to changing my mind about anything. I'm a team-player, But only if the team earns my trust and admiration.
And yeah, I did smoke crack.
Is this what you mean by rough day? Come on. We know it.
#328
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:16
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
That's what most addicts say.
They don't quit.
You have an interesting disconnect going on...
I agree that you are sounding dictatorial with your idea, so you are definitely replying to me.
dic·ta·tor
noun \ˈdik-ˌtā-tər, dik-ˈ\
: a person who rules a country with total authority and often in a cruel or brutal way
Full Definition of DICTATOR
1a : a person granted absolute emergency power; especially: one appointed by the senate of ancient Romeb : one holding complete autocratic controlc : one ruling absolutely and often oppressively
Oh, Believe me, I'd leave. It's really a long story.
I'd like you to explain this disconnection, I'm all ears to you.
And my system doesn't grant anyone absolute power, As I've stated, It evaluates personalities, Not according to my own standards. Oh, And about being a supervisor, I'm most likely to step down after the system is sustained, If it was hypothetically to be true. So, No, I'm not power-hungry, And I'm not The Illusive Man. ![]()
#329
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:19
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
We're just teasing you about your utopian order that we all feel is sure to end in a dystopia. That's why I recommended Psycho Pass, its an anime that's basically about your very idea. Only on a national scale.
Alright, I may watch it when i get to have more free time.
#330
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:20
Plastic surgery counts as beautiful! Didn't you see Artichoke's post yesterday? He wanted everyone to correct their defects!! Possibly with plastic surgery!! WE APPROVE!!!
You can even change your gender, if it makes you look better. We only care about one thing here.
#331
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:22
You can even change your gender, if it makes you look better. We only care about one thing here.
The stunning, bodacious mistress Inquisitrix Recon.
#332
Guest_OneWomanArmy_*
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:24
Guest_OneWomanArmy_*
It's settled then! Recon is in! He just need to change his gender and be beautiful!!
#333
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:24
Oh, Believe me, I'd leave. It's really a long story.
I'd like you to explain this disconnection, I'm all ears to you.
And my system doesn't grant anyone absolute power, As I've stated, It evaluates personalities, Not according to my own standards. Oh, And about being a supervisor, I'm most likely to step down after the system is sustained, If it was hypothetically to be true. So, No, I'm not power-hungry, And I'm not The Illusive Man.
Your system is flawed. It is up to no one to determine if one's personality is ''good'', or ''bad''. If it was like that, take your case. You have earned the attention of us. We do not regard you highly. You have ''contributed'' poorly to this topic.
So... what would happen to people like you?
#334
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:27
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Your system is flawed. It is up to no one to determine if one's personality is ''good'', or ''bad''. If it was like that, take your case. You have earned the attention of us. We do not regard you highly. You have ''contributed'' poorly to this topic.
So... what would happen to people like you?
And what exactly makes you think that i asked for "your" opinion? You know very damn well that i don't like you, So just state your business please.
#335
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:33
It's settled then! Recon is in! He just need to change his gender and be beautiful!!
Three cheers for Inquisitrix Recon!
Is it still called clopping if done without a dong?
- Dermain aime ceci
#336
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:35
And what exactly makes you think that i asked for "your" opinion? You know very damn well that i don't like you, So just state your business please.

Just ignore my point. Just ignore my interest in your ''system''.
#337
Posté 21 décembre 2014 - 11:52
Oh, Believe me, I'd leave. It's really a long story.
I'd like you to explain this disconnection, I'm all ears to you.
And my system doesn't grant anyone absolute power, As I've stated, It evaluates personalities, Not according to my own standards. Oh, And about being a supervisor, I'm most likely to step down after the system is sustained, If it was hypothetically to be true. So, No, I'm not power-hungry, And I'm not The Illusive Man.
You claim to dislike people that are highly opinionated and state their opinions as fact when you do the same.
You claim to be a master of analysis when most of your analyses don't show it.
You claim to be creative, but most of your ideas seem to lack creativity or even a full description. Which is illustrated here:
1. You're right, No such thing exists today, But If the system is a go, They'd have a new and special training based on the same concept the system is based on. Evaluation. I'd like to state an important point here, Hypothetically If the project is a go, I'd be supervisor, The one who created and are maintaining supervision over the system.
2. The type of questions that will asked is as i said before, The type that tests the core of your personality. The questions aren't constant, They're based on each interviewee's personality to test it thoroughly. However, When the results are out, The results' validity will be questioned thoroughly by another analysis team in association with the interviewee himself/herself to fully evaluate their personality. "Remember when i said it was made for corporations?"
3. Yes. A lie detector.
4. As i said, It's merely a concept and I'm merely a hypothetical supervisor, I wouldn't know that right now.
5. UN.
6. They'd first be advised not to lie and to tell the truth, If they don't comply, The interviewer would have the authority to question his motives for lying, If the person was lying because they were traumatized, We'd try to help, If they were just doing it for the sake of it, They'd fail the test. As for the interviewer, If he steps out of line, The interview would be stopped, And the interviewer would be fined, If not fired.
7. A rather strict selection policy. Though i prefer the term "Resiliently difficult". The thing is about corruption of power, It's basically a corruption of an idea, of a principle. Why? Well, Because it ages, And the same vision can not be maintained through generations which think entirely different, So, My idea was to have a self-creating system, "In a corporation", To engage in a big discussion with every and each employee involved and apply the idea that thrives mentally over others. Though i don't know how to apply this idea on the internet version of the system.
8. The strict selection policy would prevent any misuse if it was applied correctly.
9. Yes. The system is open-minded.
10. Yes. And he can regain it. But it'd only be revoked if the situation could not be maintained.
11. Nope. "Free and always will be." - Facebook
12. That's an interesting question, The thing is, People tend to follow successful ideas, Not theoretical ideas. So, It has to be applied successfully on a small scale in order to prove its worth and then expand it.
Number 12. is equally interesting as it shows another logical fallacy that you have been engaging in throughout this thread.
You have also claimed that your system is not simplified when it is. As shown here:
Over-Simplifying. My system isn't about that at all.
Granted, you were saying that the person was being over-simplistic with criticism, but his post is similar to what you have proposed.
#338
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:00
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
You claim to dislike people that are highly opinionated and state their opinions as fact when you do the same.
You claim to be a master of analysis when most of your analyses don't show it.
You claim to be creative, but most of your ideas seem to lack creativity or even a full description. Which is illustrated here:
Number 12. is equally interesting as it shows another logical fallacy that you have been engaging in throughout this thread.
You have also claimed that your system is not simplified when it is. As shown here:
Granted, you were saying that the person was being over-simplistic with criticism, but his post is similar to what you have proposed.
Oh, I see. No, This is a misunderstanding. I dislike people who hold on to their thoughts no matter what, I deeply respect opinionated people. I'm not the master of analysis, I'm an expert on analysis, Breaking down and predicting people's behavior. Not the kind of analysis you have in mind. Yes, Full description, It's not really my best attribute, When i speak of a point on the internet, I'm typing, Not speaking out loud, Therefore i stay focused on addressing one point with all its details, but once i get to the next point, I forget the pattern that i planned to go on to connect them all together in a perfect way. Specially If I'm busy, And to be honest, I've been pretty much busy all day tonight. You see, This is the thing that you got wrong, I've stated several times that this idea is in its infancy, There're some questions that can't be answered except by experience, But as I've also said, People don't like theoretical ideas, So, I try to solidify it to convince them and make them understand it. No, He was over-simplifying the lore, Not the words. There's a huge difference.
#339
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:04
Yeah... I don't think a female version of myself would be a very good thing for the planet.
#340
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:10
Yeah... I don't think a female version of myself would be a very good thing for the planet.
It's our decision to make, not yours.
#341
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:13
I covered that already!
I know, and I realized that almost immediately after posting that.
#342
Guest_OneWomanArmy_*
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:15
Guest_OneWomanArmy_*
It's our decision to make, not yours.
Yes, this. No gender change, no entry!
#343
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:22
I thought it was because he was a drama queen?
Well yeah.
Galactic Runner is fairly young if I remember right,
and he's a cool guy.
Same with White Fang from the old days of the RWBY thread.
He was 14 and he was pretty cool, even if he got Permabanned.
To goof off is the point of The Lobby. You understand that, you'll fit right in here. Zens problem is that he took everything way too seriously.
Hell we give TheBunz alot of crap but he's taken it pretty gracefully.
#344
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:27
#345
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:27
Oh, I see. No, This is a misunderstanding. I dislike people who hold on to their thoughts no matter what, I deeply respect opinionated people. I'm not the master of analysis, I'm an expert on analysis, Breaking down and predicting people's behavior. Not the kind of analysis you have in mind. Yes, Full description, It's not really my best attribute, When i speak of a point on the internet, I'm typing, Not speaking out loud, Therefore i stay focused on addressing one point with all its details, but once i get to the next point, I forget the pattern that i planned to go on to connect them all together in a perfect way. Specially If I'm busy, And to be honest, I've been pretty much busy all day tonight. You see, This is the thing that you got wrong, I've stated several times that this idea is in its infancy, There're some questions that can't be answered except by experience, But as I've also said, People don't like theoretical ideas, So, I try to solidify it to convince them and make them understand it. No, He was over-simplifying the lore, Not the words. There's a huge difference.
Fine, have it your way.
You're an expert on stereotyping people.
That's an oxymoron.
That's why you do a scientific experiment first. As long as it's ethical.
People are fine with theoretical ideas. They just prefer the ones that have far more information.
#346
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:28
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
No, Leo. You are wrong. I have already told you this, but it is YOU who fail to see 'outside the box' - the box that you have created around yourself. You believe that your use of eloquent speech and your 'creativitiy' (which I have yet to experience, tbh. We only have your word on this, because you don't come over as creative at all, quite the opposite.) somehow entitle you to something. Make you different, special, more intelligent, whatever. Unfortunately, as Morrigan so wonderfully puts it: wishing to be something does not make it so. But exactly this is written all over your posts, not only in this topic, but in general. You seem like an intelligent guy, but you are wasting your energy in the wrong direction.You believe you are open-minded to everything, when objectively speaking, you are not. At all.
Best example is this sentence you keep using that I just quoted. People don't agree with you, so you simply put everyone in one box and are done with it. No questions asked. If they don't understand you, they are basically not worth your attention. And this is not me putting words in your mouth, one only has to read through the pages of this topic to see that. Every form of criticism of yourself or your ideas is put off as cynicism or prejudice, while you lean back, whip your arms in the air and say 'It's the community's fault for not grasping my ideas'. Your arguments basically are always the same: people don't understand you, they put words in your mouth, they are cynical and prejudiced, and they cannot think outside the box, while you obviously see yourself as a briliant debater with genuine arguments.
There is a reason you are on this forum, and you know as well as I do that it is NOT one for intellectual debate. If I wanted intellectual discussions, I would certainly not come here. I come here to relax and be entertained, which leaves me wondering at your motives, though, since you take this place and the people in it way too seriously.
The real problem is, you are so far inside your own box that no amount of argumentation is ever going to make you see. It is not the community's duty to have to spell everything out for you. You will have to work on that yourself.
Cheers, I'm out.
P.S. If someone doesn't get a joke, whose fault is it: is it the fault of the person who is getting it told, or the person who is telling the joke? Ask yourself that next time you feel people misunderstand you.
This was a very polite ether.
#347
Guest_OneWomanArmy_*
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:31
Guest_OneWomanArmy_*
Tony... I think Leo might be scared... what if he is one of the ugly people?
Maybe that's why he is hesitating?
#348
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:32
OWA, I don't think Leo is taking our ideas seriously enough.
Ikr.
I'm ready to follow you two to hell and back.
Because you consider everyone. Especially downtrodden Vampires like me (Or was I Cthulhu? I forgot).
#349
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:36
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Fine, have it your way.
You're an expert on stereotyping people.
That's an oxymoron.
That's why you do a scientific experiment first. As long as it's ethical.
People are fine with theoretical ideas. They just prefer the ones that have far more information.
Well, I can't get it to be experimented right now, So, Theoretical thoughts is all i have. And no, You guys just don't me very well in real life. And as I've also stated, It was never meant to be the perfect solution, Just an idea to spark the conversation. I see things in a certain pattern, I expect people to see that pattern as well and criticize it based on their patters, Not just scratching the surface of it. That's probably why you think that it's an oxymoron. Maybe not. The thing is about me, I don't make such serious accusations without fully analyzing the situation mentally to see that which scenario is going to apply, I don't jump to conclusions, Every thought is a result of a deep thought, I'm not stereotyping anyone. Think about it for a while. And I'm not that hard to convince to be honest.
#350
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 22 décembre 2014 - 12:37
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Tony... I think Leo might be scared... what if he is one of the ugly people?
Maybe that's why he is hesitating?
Scared? You obviously don't know me very well.





Retour en haut





