There's the classical "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"
Yeah. That was dumb. I'll just pretend I didn't make that post. ![]()
At Leo. With me, you get infinite chances.
So. I'm being open minded.
Whilst I believe that it is not the role of the state to dictate who can and cannot be on the internet, I am open to persuasion. ![]()
I invite you to try to persuade me that this idea of internet licencing is a credible way of tackling cyber bullying.
If you can answer my questions, you might be able to win me over.
- How will these "psychological analysts" be picked? I don't know what the term is. No such role currently exists, so I'm calling them "psychological analysts".
- What kinds of questions would be asked on the test?
- What measures would be in place so that the interviewee is telling the truth? (A lie detector perhaps?)
- How would this idea be funded?
- Which authority is responsible? Is it the government, police, independent organisation, UN institution or something else?
- What measures would be in place to deal with cheating from both interviewers and interviewees?
- What measures would be in place to prevent misuse of your system?
- Obviously, we're worried about the moral implications of this system. How will this system be run so that it doesn't infringe on our civil liberties?
- If someone doesn't get their Internet licence, will they get another chance to take the test?
- Can someone who already has the licence, have theirs revoked.
- Will there be a licencing fee?
- How will you get all of the worlds nations (or at least some of them) to agree to this idea?
I could think of more questions, but I think 12 would do for now.





Retour en haut







