One is too many!
Why did we stop hanging them anyway?
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Seriously uncalled-for ![]()
One is too many!
Why did we stop hanging them anyway?
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Seriously uncalled-for ![]()
Guest_Juromaro_*
1. OP realized his initial post didn't reflect his intentions and then asked for help. We helped. This is unrelated to his opinion and/or our agreement with it.
2. Freedom of Speech is a political right, it means you can express your opinion without fearing prosecution from the government just for disagreeing. Nothing more, nothing less. It does not mean you can say whatever you want without consequences. Your opinion is not something sacred, you are accountable for it. You probably mean Freedom of Expression, which is a basic human right recognized under the UDHR.
All those rights do not protect you when you infringe on the rights of another person. You are free to tell someone "I do not like how you do things." but you can't tell them "You suck, you idiot!" because that's an insult and infringes on their personal rights.
Long story short: Don't hide behind Freedom of Speech, because it doesn't protect you from any and all consequences. It's not carte blanche to say whatever you want, especially not if it's discriminatory.
3. Yep, none of the romances appeal to me.
1: From what I read he/she originally posted something, got attacked for it and back pedaled to be more accepting. That's just what I got from reading the first page. I may be wrong but it seemed to me his/her original intent was taken as hostile. If the OP really did feel that she/he posted wrong then I stand by my "disregard the top" message.
2: *Fixed* even though the UDHR Preamble states "Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people".....The fact that Freedom of Speech was included in the UDHR it is considered a Human Right, so is Expression. *Source* http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
3: Me personally I loved Cassandra's personality, just not her looks. same with Josie
What is the point of this thread OP? You think that gay content is threatening to overtake 'your' game?
Guest_Juromaro_*
What is the point of this thread OP? You think that gay content is threatening to overtake 'your' game?
No need for that. no where did the OP state that. Really don't need to turn this thread into one of those threads.
So? It doesn't invalidate my point that Freedom of Speech/Expression doesn't protect you from all consequences. It does not protect you if you break other laws, like giving a speech that incites a riot or riling up people or insulting a person or misinformation to cause harm etc...
This human right only applies when dealing with governments. It does not apply to the conduct between private persons, companies or institutions. It certaintly doesn't include the infringement of rights.
Freedom of Speech is not a shield to hide behind, it is not an excuse to "only say what I think". Everyone is accountable for their actions, this includes the things they say.
How often have we seen someone make a discriminatory statement and then followed up with, "Hey, Freedom of Speech."? That's the part I dislike.
No need for that. no where did the OP state that. Really don't need to turn this thread into one of those threads.
Well then enlighten me. What does "just enough" mean.
What is the point of this thread OP? You think that gay content is threatening to overtake 'your' game?
Point was to ask community for a favor. I mean, to stop those passionate discussions in nearby topics if Bioware should change LI's sexual preferences towards gay.
It turned out that I misunderstood LBGT game community purpose, which was to suggest something new for the next Bioware game. In this case those discussions are more than just fine.
So I guess now this thread may serve as a reminder for two things:
1. It's easy to lose your mind and manners in a debate;
2. It takes a little nerve and a lot of will to aknowledge your flaws.
Ah. And ofc 3: express your thoughts as sharp as you can, otherwise you can be misunderstood.
Guest_Juromaro_*
So? It doesn't invalidate my point that Freedom of Speech/Expression doesn't protect you from all consequences. It does not protect you if you break other laws, like giving a speech that incites a riot or riling up people or insulting a person or misinformation to cause harm etc...
This human right only applies when dealing with governments. It does not apply to the conduct between private persons, companies or institutions. It certaintly doesn't include the infringement of rights.
Freedom of Speech is not a shield to hide behind, it is not an excuse to "only say what I think". Everyone is accountable for their actions, this includes the things they say.
How often have we seen someone make a discriminatory statement and then followed up with, "Hey, Freedom of Speech."? That's the part I dislike.
Very true, it doesn't protect you from the consequences. Doesn't mean someone shouldn't voice their opinion.
No law, no UDHR, nothing protects anyone from anything. You can call my children ingrates if you wanted that's fine, wouldn't stop me from throwing a brick even though I'd be the one going to jail since the "law" protects your right to say it.
Freedom of Speech was not used as a shield to hide behind in terms of deflecting consequence. I said it(well typed it) in terms of the OP changing what was originally said because the first page of posters attacked him/her for saying whatever it was she/he said. I simply stated he/she doesn't have to change his words and opinions just because it made people angry, and you took it as using a "shield" to hide behind. I don't know where your wanting to go with this direction?
*Edit* and Yes, I can say something discriminatory if I wanted to(even though I didn't). It's up to the forum mods working for bioware to determine what the consequence of that said remark would be as the forums are their property that is their right. It is not the forum users job to determine who gets to say what and when.
Very true, it doesn't protect you from the consequences. Doesn't mean someone shouldn't voice their opinion.
No law, no UDHR, nothing protects anyone from anything. You can call my children ingrates if you wanted that's fine, wouldn't stop me from throwing a brick even though I'd be the one going to jail since the "law" protects your right to say it.
Freedom of Speech was not used as a shield to hide behind in terms of deflecting consequence. I said it(well typed it) in terms of the OP changing what was originally said because the first page of posters attacked him/her for saying whatever it was she/he said. I simply stated he/she doesn't have to change his words and opinions just because it made people angry, and you took it as using a "shield" to hide behind. I don't know where your wanting to go with this direction?
Nope, if I insulted your kids I would be breaking a law and be the guilty party. You throwing a brick at me is an entirely different matter. Also, please don't do that. ![]()
You brought Freedom of Speech up as an argument for the OP being able to express his opinion here. As I tried to explain in previous posts, it doesn't apply here, thus it isn't a valid argument.
I am all for people voicing their opinions, for discussions and arguments. They should keep it civil though, it doesn't help any if people are being discriminatory, insulting or obnoxious.
I can see where this is heading, so I'll just leave you all with this cute picture of a basset hound:
OP, you might want to duck and cover. While I know you had good (if misworded) intentions, this is going to get ugly fast.
-__-' How about we do this, shut our lips enjoy Christmas, Xmas, Winter Solstice, Hanukkah or WTFever you call it. If your Athiest, Thiest, Buddhist, Hindu, Antrastian, Qunari, Black, White, Asian, all those in between, furries. WTFever. Kiss your boyfriend(s), girlfriend(s). Drink eggnog *sips his* Ooo, too much spice. Hm, refreshing tho. *coughs* Point being, CouncillorTevos made a simple question. I'm bi, and I'm more offended by 70% of the spazoids, than Tevos's question to which wasn't. So... please... PLEASE, let this be the last message on here.
I can see where this is heading, so I'll just leave you all with this cute picture of a basset hound:
Spoiler
OP, you might want to duck and cover. While I know you had good (if misworded) intentions, this is going to get ugly fast.
Meh. It's Christmas. I'm not going to argue or anything. I will just presume that OP wants equal options for everyone and leave it at that.
Guest_Juromaro_*
Nope, if I insulted your kids I would be breaking a law and be the guilty party. You throwing a brick at me is an entirely different matter. Also, please don't do that.
You brought Freedom of Speech up as an argument for the OP being able to express his opinion here. As I tried to explain in previous posts, it doesn't apply here, thus it isn't a valid argument.
I am all for people voicing their opinions, for discussions and arguments. They should keep it civil though, it doesn't help any if people are being discriminatory, insulting or obnoxious.
Heh I wouldn't throw a brick anyway I know first hand the damage that can do to someone, I'll never do it again unless I'm in mortal danger .
As for the rest though, that is the definition of Freedom of Speech(as defined by US standards as I'm American, not sure what other countries define FoS as) "the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint."
Though one could argue that because we are on the internet certain laws don't apply as Internet is international. Idk, I'll just respectfully agree to disagree and leave it there
.
But yes, it should be kept Civil though.
Freedom of speech doesn't apply here, for the most part, because you have to agree to Terms of Use when you register, and those terms generally involve not being a **** to other people. "I have freedom of speech!" is an uninformed argument for any kind of moderated public forum.
I'm slightly confused on the OP's point, probably because the wording is just strange (I'm chalking that up to English not being their first language). This feedback is based off of the comments sort of translating the meaning of it, so if I got it wrong I apologize in advance.
I would rather Bioware keep their characters the way that they were developed as individuals to be, including sexuality, rather than just try to fill in "needed slots" so that everyone gets the same amount in fairness. If a character is written as straight, and it makes sense for them to be straight, then that's what they should be. If a character is gay, it makes sense to their character, let them be gay. If they're bisexual, let them be bisexual. It shouldn't be about editing or changing things just to keep all of it even. Everyone should have representation, I wholeheartedly believe in this, but I would prefer well-written and rounded characters that make sense than having something edited or cut just to even things out.
The idea of limiting to one of each, just to keep it even, when there is a possibility for something greater in game and character development is kind of disconcerting. If a game ends up having five homosexual romances and three straight ones, if it fits to the characters then by all means.
I also don't think anything should get patched in to change what's already been released as far as in game development, I just wish more people were open to the harmless interpretations other people have of certain characters. I guess sometimes it's too much to ask for people to try and understand it from the POVs of others.
I like how OP portrays himself/herself as a victim and insulting everyone else in a few seemingly innocent lines. It's actually quite good for someone who says has problems with english.
Point was to ask community for a favor. I mean, to stop those passionate discussions in nearby topics if Bioware should change LI's sexual preferences towards gay.
It turned out that I misunderstood LBGT game community purpose, which was to suggest something new for the next Bioware game. In this case those discussions are more than just fine.
So I guess now this thread may serve as a reminder for two things:
1. It's easy to lose your mind and manners in a debate;2. It takes a little nerve and a lot of will to aknowledge your flaws.
Ah. And ofc 3: express your thoughts as sharp as you can, otherwise you can be misunderstood.
What is the point of this thread OP? You think that gay content is threatening to overtake 'your' game?
You'd go to jail for throwing a brick because throwing bricks at people is assault. That has nothing to do with speech.Very true, it doesn't protect you from the consequences. Doesn't mean someone shouldn't voice their opinion.
No law, no UDHR, nothing protects anyone from anything. You can call my children ingrates if you wanted that's fine, wouldn't stop me from throwing a brick even though I'd be the one going to jail since the "law" protects your right to say it.
Freedom of Speech was not used as a shield to hide behind in terms of deflecting consequence. I said it(well typed it) in terms of the OP changing what was originally said because the first page of posters attacked him/her for saying whatever it was she/he said. I simply stated he/she doesn't have to change his words and opinions just because it made people angry, and you took it as using a "shield" to hide behind. I don't know where your wanting to go with this direction?
*Edit* and Yes, I can say something discriminatory if I wanted to(even though I didn't). It's up to the forum mods working for bioware to determine what the consequence of that said remark would be as the forums are their property that is their right. It is not the forum users job to determine who gets to say what and when.
Guest_TrillClinton_*
I mean, people, please...
Companions are be balanced and fine as they are, you know. Like 1 of a type for everybody!
That applies to sexuality, too. We have here in DA:I a straight male LI (Cass), a straight female LI (Curlie, forgot his actual name, sorry), straight female elf LI (Chuckles) - first time in a franchise, few bisexual chars (Josie, Iron Bull), gay female char (Sera), gay male char (Dorian).
Didn't make a female dwarf, maybe there's an exclusive option for Varric. I don't know.
That's perfectly fine I tell ya!
Please be a lil bit more honest to others and don't ask gay romance patch advantages over other sexual appearances. Bioware tends to listen.
Thank you, friends.
Merry Christmas!
[UPD] A lot of people got the point of my message wrong due to my stubborness. I didn't mean that gay relationships are somewhat wrong, or that same abusive behaviour from straight people is welcome, or anything like that. Point is that the romancing characters are fine as they are in DA: I and they surely don't need any tweaks.
And again, I'm the one with a hand up for total pansexuality of all romanceable characters from the start. It may take a lot of effort to write all the lines for both gender romances, but it is worthwhile IMHO.
yo...what? A'ite I will be back with vodka to read this.
Anywho, this is meant as something funny and not at all a jab at OP. Obviously who doesn't agree, "misunderstands" me.
Now, all joking aside, as I was writing this silly post I was thinking about the whole thing and I'm going for definite overkill here, but whatever. It's xmas, I feel generous.
Let me thank you for all your kind words about me in the first place. It's been a while back I got quite a high reception for my English.
Most people agree that I'm not any good in it. You know, those 'poor vocabulary' issues and such on.
As fo the second - when I say 'we' I don't speak for everyone but you. When I say 'we' I speak for myself and a little but organized franchise fanbase here in Mari.
I don't really think I have to prove anything for a random internet troll tho, so consider last lines as a clarifying thesis.
When I am speaking about gay community purpose in those discussions I mean what I've summed up from a feedback here. Easy, right? Ask some LBGT community members to define a purpose of troubling topics and sum those up.
It's a shame you are still that offensive. Maybe you should watch some ponies to start thinking somewhat clear and friendly :3
Some very reasonable people clarified what the op meant with him and said some very reasonable things. It would be a shame if things got out of hand now because people weren't reading the previous pages.
Those agressives that put up a fight aren't reading messages to get a point. They're after wicked fun they call 'trolling'.
Bet this isn't a type when 'wicked is good'.
Isn't it "Funny" that we can see or interpret things so differently even when we are on the same page!
Personally, I see too much on the hormonal issues and not enough on the relationship building ones. I feel forced into a romance when it isn't necessary and this page has good examples of finding common ground.
I partially agree with you. There is enough of them, in fact there is too many of them. My straight character who prefers straight companions gets only one straight female romance: Cassandra and she is not even appriopriately feminine to fulfill my taste. I think that BioWare should change its statement from 'we don't want to cater to majority of population' to 'we are sorry, our biggest monetary contributors, here are your straight female romances'. It does not sit well with me and I feel that my money supported the agenda I wholeheartedly oppose with every fiber of my existence.
I partially agree with you. There is enough of them, in fact there is too many of them. My straight character who prefers straight companions gets only one straight female romance: Cassandra and she is not even appriopriately feminine to fulfill my taste. I think that BioWare should change its statement from 'we don't want to cater to majority of population' to 'we are sorry, our biggest monetary contributors, here are your straight female romances'. It does not sit well with me and I feel that my money supported the agenda I wholeheartedly oppose with every fiber of my existence.
If you don't like the "agenda" that Bioware is supporting then maybe you should play something that caters more to your attitude. Like a board game. You make the decision to purchase these games, after Bioware has been "catering" to the masses for a number of years now, over several different games.