I have drawn the conclusion that you were wrong to interpret the thread title as you did because the thread title does not say that. Even you agree that it does not, as you refer to your position as an inference.
The "apart from Sera" portion of the thread title does nothing but exclude Sera from the question. It makes no claims about Sera at all.
The thread's title implies nothing, as implication doesn't exist.
I am able to draw that inference. I simply choose not to do so, as it is not supported by the evidence.
"More likely than not" is not a position that has been advanced previously in this thread. It may well be the case that the OP believed Sera to be widely disliked. But nothing in the OP supports that conclusion.
The only rational interpretation is a literal one. The OP merely excludes Sera from the question, and makes no claims regarding her.
Regarding the OP's lack of refutation, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
The thread's title, specifically "apart from Sera", implies that the OP believes most people believe Sera is the "most hated" companion. Most logical, rational people would interpret the thread's title to have that meaning. The OP's exclusion of Sera from the question implies that he believes most people believe Sera is the "most hated" companion. There is no logical or rational reason to exclude Sera otherwise. Clearly, I am not the one who has "shoddy" reasoning.





Retour en haut





