Good Lord, I can understand your hesitation!
On the one hand, story and writing are the only thing Bioware games usually have good. So you don't want spoilers.
On the other hand, too much heat in the threads with feedback. People are angry!
Wash both your hands, get popcorn, coke and watch this playthrough. You can't spoil that, so at least go smile.
100 parts of pure awesomeness. Any aspect of a game you want - it's there.
Council is a troll. The game is horrible! If you liked DAO and expecting it to be like DAO but better you'll be sadly dissappointed. As a person who BUYS games, witcher, DAO, Skyrim, etc, with the lies bioware claimed on this game, I'll support anybody who takes a pirate version to satisfy their curiosity from the money they stole from their lies.
This game is DA2 with even less of your choices making a difference (which DA2 was a big downgrade from DAO), AND the majority of the gameplay is WoW style fetch quests that have nothing to do with the main story.
If you buy the game, get it close to free. Bioware needs to be punished for their lies and dumbing down console import. I even suspect this game may be a paid beta for them changing to MMORG with all the ridiculous pointless fetch quests.
Council is a troll. The game is horrible! If you liked DAO and expecting it to be like DAO but better you'll be sadly dissappointed. As a person who BUYS games, witcher, DAO, Skyrim, etc, with the lies bioware claimed on this game, I'll support anybody who takes a pirate version to satisfy their curiosity from the money they stole from their lies.
This game is DA2 with even less of your choices making a difference (which DA2 was a big downgrade from DAO), AND the majority of the gameplay is WoW style fetch quests that have nothing to do with the main story.
If you buy the game, get it close to free. Bioware needs to be punished for their lies and dumbing down console import. I even suspect this game may be a paid beta for them changing to MMORG with all the ridiculous pointless fetch quests.
Wha~ I mean are you even serious? How could I end a troll in your books?
Please try the video prior to speaking about the topic :/
Council is a troll. The game is horrible! If you liked DAO and expecting it to be like DAO but better you'll be sadly dissappointed. As a person who BUYS games, witcher, DAO, Skyrim, etc, with the lies bioware claimed on this game, I'll support anybody who takes a pirate version to satisfy their curiosity from the money they stole from their lies.
This game is DA2 with even less of your choices making a difference (which DA2 was a big downgrade from DAO), AND the majority of the gameplay is WoW style fetch quests that have nothing to do with the main story.
If you buy the game, get it close to free. Bioware needs to be punished for their lies and dumbing down console import. I even suspect this game may be a paid beta for them changing to MMORG with all the ridiculous pointless fetch quests.
*reads, reads again...frowns, reads again, chuckles, makes dismissing gesture with hand and leaves thread*
Yeah this isn't a troll... Some people like the game, some people don't.
I, for one, like it, to a point.
I just wish they didn't have so many pointless side quests, w/o dialogue.
Yeah this isn't a troll... Some people like the game, some people don't.
I, for one, like it, to a point.
I just wish they didn't have so many pointless side quests, w/o dialogue.
Sometimes I think of DA: I as a chest full of 'Read Me' puzzles. But it's not the point.
Watch the video, get some fun afterall 
Just smiles for everybody.
DO NOT BUY THIS GAME!
It has a lot of potential but in it's current state it's very close ot unplayable. A lot of content missing and bugged. Do not buy this game. If you have to play it, I urge to to just download a cracked copy of it. I made the mistake of buying it and I'd be sorry to see more people doing the same mistake.
Don't do it.
100 parts of pure awesomeness. Any aspect of a game you want - it's there.
Oh geez, please take a step down, would you? You sound like a fanboy (no offense).
I mean, you make the game sound better than it actual is... and no, it's also not as bad as some other make it sound.
Inquisition is not a bad game - that's for sure. It's ok with tendency to good, but nowhere near great.
It`s a question of what you expect from it. If you expect a mixture of skyrim and DA2, you'll be fine with Inquisition.
If you expect a worthy sequel to Origins, you won't.
And please don't express your opinion by showing some Youtube-video - you appear like a promotional-agent.
Watch the video, then interpret his post in that context. He's neither troll nor fanboy. 
Daym loved so hard at the "mah loot" part.
Nice way to get carried away from monstrousity the plot is :3
All I got to say is that if some one is going to the forums of any game to see if its worth while, then they have failed basic reasoning.
Anyone with 1/2 a brain knows that forums (specially related to any game with EAs stamp on it) is going to get the vocal minority shoving bullshit down their throats.
Want to know if you should get it? Go to youtube and watch some LetsPlays.
All I got to say is that if some one is going to the forums of any game to see if its worth while, then they have failed basic reasoning.
Anyone with 1/2 a brain knows that forums (specially related to any game with EAs stamp on it) is going to get the vocal minority shoving bullshit down their throats.
Want to know if you should get it? Go to youtube and watch some LetsPlays.
Please, please!
Attend to the video I've provided.
You will be surprized, but it's a playthrough with very kind comments.
Interestingly enough most of the people who complain the most on these forums have admitted to never having owned the game to begin with. Their loss. This game is good, and as someone who enjoyed DAO and DA2, this was the best in the series to me. I got 5 unique playthroughs out of it and had to stop due to lack of time, still plenty more to do and so much I've yet to experience. This game is worth every penny.
Interestingly enough most of the people who complain the most on these forums have admitted to never having owned the game to begin with. Their loss. This game is good, and as someone who enjoyed DAO and DA2, this was the best in the series to me. I got 5 unique playthroughs out of it and had to stop due to lack of time, still plenty more to do and so much I've yet to experience. This game is worth every penny.
'Kissass' achievement unlocked for you, thanks for the feedback.
'Kissass' achievement unlocked for you, thanks for the feedback.
Don't get me wrong the game has its faults just like any other, but they are very minor and no game is 100% perfect. (i.e. no schematic preview before buy, lack of qunari race specific armors, and other minor little things)
Don't get me wrong the game has its faults just like any other, but they are very minor and no game is 100% perfect. (i.e. no schematic preview before buy, lack of qunari race specific armors, and other minor little things)
Hu, no they are NOT "very minor"...
Don't get me wrong the game has its faults just like any other, but they are very minor and no game is 100% perfect. (i.e. no schematic preview before buy, lack of qunari race specific armors, and other minor little things)
This little tricky thing, you know, called 'user experience'.
It is good for you that you play this game and it was nice to you. We get it.
But the entire 1st gen console community has problems even with LAUNCHING the game. If those peeps manage to fight their way through actually LAUNCHING the game, the have all kinds of graphics and audio 'artifacts' (bugs). And mind you, there are lots of people who still play 1st gen.
Same goes for not-so-top PCs. A lot of people can't see a point in upgrading to what's top these days as they're waiting for something entirely new. And that doesn't count people who CAN'T buy modern PCs due to economy problems in their countries.
So I must repeat myself - WE GET IT THAT YOU LIKE THE GAME. THANK YOU.
BUT IT DOESN'T NEGATE PROBLEMS OTHER PEOPLE HAVE WITH IT.
Hopefully you'll get caps more understandable.
This little tricky thing, you know, called 'user experience'.
It is good for you that you play this game and it was nice to you. We get it.
But the entire 1st gen console community has problems even with LAUNCHING the game. If those peeps manage to fight their way through actually LAUNCHING the game, the have all kinds of graphics and audio 'artifacts' (bugs). And mind you, there are lots of people who still play 1st gen.
Same goes for not-so-top PCs. A lot of people can't see a point in upgrading to what's top these days as they're waiting for something entirely new. And that doesn't count people who CAN'T buy modern PCs due to economy problems in their countries.
So I must repeat myself - WE GET IT THAT YOU LIKE THE GAME. THANK YOU.
BUT IT DOESN'T NEGATE PROBLEMS OTHER PEOPLE HAVE WITH IT.
Hopefully you'll get caps more understandable.
You should learn to maintain composure when met with opposing opinions. Engaging in the textual equivalent of shouting isn't going to help you get your point across. The argument you presented is prevalent throughout this forum, yet I still fail to see how it is Bioware's fault that a next gen engine doesn't run properly on last gen hardware. Whether it is pc or console is irrelevant.
Have you seen the minimum/recommended specs? Take a look at graphics and see how much Vram is required under minimum: 512mb. Do you know how much the xbox 360 and PS3 have? 256mb.
Lets talk CPUs.
A minimum of 4 processor cores, yet the xbox 360 has only 3 and the PS3 is essentially 1. Do I really need to go on?
As for PCs, you expect Bioware to stick to an engine that will run on low/mid tier hardware because some people might not be able to afford upgrades? It's called next gen for a reason. Most of these engines (Frostbite 3, UE4) were developed with next gen hardware in mind. Last gen has too many constraints, developing it for hardware/technology that will last us the next 10 years was the only way to go. It's a miracle they even got the game to run on xbox 360/PS3. They had to scale the game down considerably to do so. Sufficient hardware compatibility is essential for software to run efficiently. There's nothing new here.
The 360 came out in 2005. It wasn't even 2 years later that ME1 came out, and it struggled to stay at 30fps, while playing silky smooth on the average PC at that time. It got even worse with ME2, and then 3 as further improvements were made to the engine, along with lighting models and shaders. You can't play new games on outdated hardware. PC users have the option of simply upgrading. Console users are stuck with what they have. It's what you get when you shell out $400 for a gaming rig. A decent PC is going to cost at least $1500. You get the experience you're willing to pay for. The reality is software/games are hardware bound.
Also, just a side note: You might want to read the TOS before checking the accept box. There is a clause in there that specifically states that they don't have to guarantee the game will work. This is due to the plethora of unique variables introduced with each individuals rig, be it a console or pc. (software/drivers, firmware, hardware age/condition).
You should learn to maintain composure when met with opposing opinions. Engaging in the textual equivalent of shouting isn't going to help you get your point across. The argument you presented is prevalent throughout this forum, yet I still fail to see how it is Bioware's fault that a next gen engine doesn't run properly on last gen hardware. Whether it is pc or console is irrelevant.
Have you seen the minimum/recommended specs? Take a look at graphics and see how much Vram is required under minimum: 512mb. Do you know how much the xbox 360 and PS3 have? 256mb.
Lets talk CPUs.
A minimum of 4 processor cores, yet the xbox 360 has only 3 and the PS3 is essentially 1. Do I really need to go on?
As for PCs, you expect Bioware to stick to an engine that will run on low/mid tier hardware because some people might not be able to afford upgrades? It's called next gen for a reason. Most of these engines (Frostbite 3, UE4) were developed with next gen hardware in mind. Last gen has too many constraints, developing it for hardware/technology that will last us the next 10 years was the only way to go. It's a miracle they even got the game to run on xbox 360/PS3. They had to scale the game down considerably to do so. Sufficient hardware compatibility is essential for software to run efficiently. There's nothing new here.
The 360 came out in 2005. It wasn't even 2 years later that ME1 came out, and it struggled to stay at 30fps, while playing silky smooth on the average PC at that time. It got even worse with ME2, and then 3 as further improvements were made to the engine, along with lighting models and shaders. You can't play new games on outdated hardware. PC users have the option of simply upgrading. Console users are stuck with what they have. It's what you get when you shell out $400 for a gaming rig. A decent PC is going to cost at least $1500. You get the experience you're willing to pay for. The reality is software/games are hardware bound.
Also, just a side note: You might want to read the TOS before checking the accept box. There is a clause in there that specifically states that they don't have to guarantee the game will work. This is due to the plethora of unique variables introduced with each individuals rig, be it a console or pc. (software/drivers, firmware, hardware age/condition).
1. Bioware stated that the game will be nice on 3rd gen consoles. 'Same aesthetics, slightly less details'. Developer stated that and lots of people bought the game they can't play. Who's to blame, fanboy?
2. This engine isn't next gen. It's Frostbite 3 (!), which was used in a pretty nice game called Battlefield 4. Go check the vids - it runs great on XB360 and PS3.
Surprizingly the game on the same engine doesn't run nice on same gear. Who's to blame, fanboy?
[skipped fanboy lyrics]
THIS is how developers create games on Frostbite 3. And THAT is a FPS, that needs much more attention to detail.
If you find that oily hair, automatic ressurection after jumping off a bridge and other players making stupid ****** comment videos are nogos for you, then by all means, don't buy this game.
However, if you want an idea of how good the game actually is, you might want to check out some reviews that say more than 'duh, stupid' and '****** again'.
'Kissass' achievement unlocked for you, too.
Have to get more of those I see - stuff is quite popular.
1. Bioware stated that the game will be nice on 3rd gen consoles. 'Same aesthetics, slightly less details'. Developer stated that and lots of people bought the game they can't play. Who's to blame, fanboy?
2. This engine isn't next gen. It's Frostbite 3 (!), which was used in a pretty nice game called Battlefield 4. Go check the vids - it runs great on XB360 and PS3.
Surprizingly the game on the same engine doesn't run nice on same gear. Who's to blame, fanboy?
And scaled down visuals is exactly what you get. I've seen people who are able to start and play the game just fine on the 360/PS3. Stop making blanket claims that each and every PS3/360 user can't start the game. It's about as accurate as saying each and every PC user is experiencing CTDS, or freezing on startups.
Frostbite 3 is next gen, BF4 on consoles is scaled down as well. Difference is, multiplayer games and singleplayer games are developed differently. Multiplayer games cannot handle the same amount of triangles per frame, or high resolution textures as a singleplayer due to the added ms and issues with replication. So while BF4 and DAI both scale down on consoles, the initial "height" so to speak is vastly different in each title. A character in BF4 may be 13000 tris whereas a character in DAI would be 45000. You're comparing apples to oranges.
Also, you don't have to resort to petty name calling. It does you no credit.
Retour en haut