And LOTR now looks like a Late Bioware product that cared a lot about spreading Sexual messages...
If you mean the book, know that Tolkien was firmly catholic, and would never have inserted material that could have gone against the 6th commandment.
And LOTR now looks like a Late Bioware product that cared a lot about spreading Sexual messages...
If you mean the book, know that Tolkien was firmly catholic, and would never have inserted material that could have gone against the 6th commandment.
No derailing, we are discussing; Charlize, Courtney, Riley, Abbey, Rosie, and don’t forget Zoë and Tom should be ok too; I suspect we will want to watch a couple of times. Pictures are welcome.
Don't put Tom as an afterthought! He's established himself as a very proficient actor. Inception may have garnered more recognition but Bronson showed his skills. Even if the movie itself was just good, his performance was excellent.
And I'm going to enjoy every minute of it.
campy movies make the world go round.
in that case Mad Max is the wrong movie for you, because its ****** awesome
Guest_Corvus I_*
Yah, yah, yah... he does not have ******.Don't put Tom as an afterthought! He's established himself as a very proficient actor. Inception may have garnered more recognition but Bronson showed his skills. Even if the movie itself was just good, his performance was excellent.
Yah, yah, yah... he does not have ******.
Edit: No ****, ****** is a banned word?
**** ***** *** ********* **** Cause he could've ***** ********* ***** but that little ************* Is a god********** ****** **** his head!! Censors are crazy.
But you're right he doesn't. His acting ability is up there with Charlize though...
in that case Mad Max is the wrong movie for you, because its ****** awesome
I never said it wasn't....
Guest_Corvus I_*
There are always excuses for *****, but it gets ***** and ***** to have to keep ***** just for a couple of ***** and you are no doubt one of the ***** that leads ***** and *****. When will you quite this incessant ***** and grow ***** for the ******. But I do like your ***** pic shall I post it for you?**** ***** *** ********* ****8 Cause he could've ***** ********* ***** but that little ************* Is a god********** ****** **** his head!!!!!!!!
I never said it wasn't....
i read that as crappy....ive only had 2 coffees today...
There's a perpetual market for movies with fast cars and explosions.
#formulaicmovies #whyhaveaplot #zoomzoomzoomboomboomboom
i read that as crappy....ive only had 2 coffees today...
CAMPY
Have another pot.

There's a perpetual market for movies with fast cars and explosions.
#formulaicmovies #whyhaveaplot #zoomzoomzoomboomboomboom
Right? I mean did you watch the King's Speech?
#explosionporn #MikeBay'swetdream
There's a perpetual market for movies with fast cars and explosions.
#formulaicmovies #whyhaveaplot #zoomzoomzoomboomboomboom
That's why there are seven Fast and Furious movies when one was more than enough.
There are always excuses for *****, but it gets ***** and ***** to have to keep ***** just for a couple of ***** and you are no doubt one of the ***** that leads ***** and *****. When will you quite this incessant ***** and grow ***** for the ******. But I do like your ***** pic shall I post it for you?
'k
Be a 19th century style sh*tlord like me. That's a glorious life.
Those first three Mad Max movies were hilariously inconsistent in tone. Not unlike Gibson's other franchise "Lethal Weapon," the first film was spr srs bsns and then the sequels began layering in comedy and intentional camp.
I'll admit Beyond Thunderdome was pretty funny. And the first two deserve their place in post-apolcalyptic/near future sci-fi history as having helped shape the genre in predominantly good ways.
But I have no interest in a sequel/remake/reboot being made at this late stage. I probably wouldn't have watched it regardless of the press, or that they replaced Mel Gibson, or that, apparently, Max isn't even the protagonist of the film bearing his name.
I honestly have not ever seen a resurrection of an eighties franchise that I enjoyed. They're making a fifth Indiana Jones movie that I guarantee that I'll never see. I used to consider Harrison Ford, George Lucas, and Steven Spielberg names that I could rely on, but when filmmakers trudge up dead franchises to cash in on the name, their talent takes a distant back seat to the "make a mass-appeal movie" goal that is so necessary to the entire concept of making money from an existing franchise, rather than taking the risk of starting a new one.
Talented filmmakers taking risks make better movies. Tired old franchises being resurrected for cash are, at best, a crap shoot as to whether they're even watchable.
Not to say that I hope that it's a bad movie, or that it flops, or that I think anything one way or another of the people who like it. It's just that at this point, I'm no longer willing to give franchise resurrections two hours of my life, let alone my money. And it takes a heck of a lot more than people on the internet saying that it's good to change my mind. ![]()
I would agree with baby, but imma still see it.
And besides look at Dredd. Sly's Dredd sucked butts. Then we get Bones Dredd that is based more on the tone (not canon, tone) of the source material and we get an actual movie worth watching.
It can be done. And I'm more hyped about Mad Max than Ultron. I'm getting burnt out on Marvel movies.
Guest_Corvus I_*
Well, well, you probably need changed.Those first three Mad Max movies were hilariously inconsistent in tone. Not unlike Gibson's other franchise "Lethal Weapon," the first film was spr srs bsns and then the sequels began layering in comedy and intentional camp.
I'll admit Beyond Thunderdome was pretty funny. And the first two deserve their place in post-apolcalyptic/near future sci-fi history as having helped shape the genre in predominantly good ways.
But I have no interest in a sequel/remake/reboot being made at this late stage. I probably wouldn't have watched it regardless of the press, or that they replaced Mel Gibson, or that, apparently, Max isn't even the protagonist of the film bearing his name.
I honestly have not ever seen a resurrection of an eighties franchise that I enjoyed. They're making a fifth Indiana Jones movie that I guarantee that I'll never see. I used to consider Harrison Ford, George Lucas, and Steven Spielberg names that I could rely on, but when filmmakers trudge up dead franchises to cash in on the name, their talent takes a distant back seat to the "make a mass-appeal movie" goal that is so necessary to the entire concept of making money from an existing franchise, rather than taking the risk of starting a new one.
Talented filmmakers taking risks make better movies. Tired old franchises being resurrected for cash are, at best, a crap shoot as to whether they're even watchable.
Not to say that I hope that it's a bad movie, or that it flops, or that I think anything one way or another of the people who like it. It's just that at this point, I'm no longer willing to give franchise resurrections two hours of my life, let alone my money. And it takes a heck of a lot more than people on the internet saying that it's good to change my mind.
Well, well, you probably need changed.
Nah, probably just another bottle..........of beer.
I'm really mad that there is no Mel Gibson in the new Mad Max.
I would agree with baby, but imma still see it.
And besides look at Dredd. Sly's Dredd sucked butts. Then we get Bones Dredd that is based more on the tone (not canon, tone) of the source material and we get an actual movie worth watching.
I didn't see the new Judge Dredd, but Sly's movie was a nineties adaptation of a comic book, so I don't really see it as resurrecting a franchise. There is still the same concept (existing franchises are easier to make money with than new ones) but it was not directly associated with the earlier film so much as the comic on which both were based.
Well, well, you probably need changed.
Not my fault. Beer is a diuretic.
I'm really mad that there is no Mel Gibson in the new Mad Max.
Nah he's too crazy.
Pooppee jokes achieved.
I deftly switched to make the joke less messy.
My favorite actors are:
Mel Gibson, Nicolas Cage, Mark Wahlberg, Silvester Stallone, Russel Crowe, Johnny Depp and a few more.
Anyone who doesn't like any of them will receive a slap from me.
Tolerance level: - 1000!
Guest_Corvus I_*
Wimp.Tolerance level: - 1000!
My favorite actors are:
Mel Gibson, Nicolas Cage, Mark Wahlberg, Silvester Stallone, Russel Crowe, Johnny Depp and a few more.
Anyone who doesn't like any of them will receive a slap from me.
Tolerance level: - 1000!
Anyone who has Russel Crowe on a list of favourite actors doesn't deserve to slap my face...