Guest_Lathrim_*
Well, This thread is about hating, Isn't it?
Sure. My point is, I don't think people who somehow made you think so low of them are worth feeling anything for.
An easy example would be - let's say you act violently towards your pets without any need whatsoever. I would hate your actions, your belief that these actions are somehow okay, but I wouldn't hate you. My feelings towards would would range from nothing to pity, in all honesty.
But, you know, to each their own.
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Sure. My point is, I don't think people who somehow made you think so low of them are worth feeling anything for.
An easy example would be - let's say you act violently towards your pets without any need whatsoever. I would hate your actions, your belief that these actions are somehow okay, but I wouldn't hate you. My feelings towards would would range from nothing to pity, in all honesty.
But, you know, to each their own.
I'd feel disgusted and i would wanna help. But that's just me.
Guest_Lathrim_*
I'd feel disgusted and i would wanna help. But that's just me.
Help the animal? Sure. I'd do that, too.
Person, though? I'm not interested.
After posting to a thread, and not knowing what to do with yourself next.
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Help the animal? Sure. I'd do that, too.
Person, though? I'm not interested.
That's what i meant, And that's why i would express my hate openly to that person.
Lol ninjaed
Guest_OneWomanArmy_*
Haha, good one! 
If only you were as direct as you are self-righteous you could then have gotten to the point in the first remark. Think of how much more efficient that would be. Any other claims you'd like to make oh mighty paragon of the BSN?
And now I'm self-righteous, and a paragon on the BSN!
I'm moving down in the world... 
And now I'm self-righteous, and a paragon on the BSN!
I'm moving down in the world...
Actually I'm kind of impressed. I think you could cause romance thread level drama without the romance thread.
I salute you.
"Mail Online" aka the DailyMail's website
The DailyMail is the worst newspaper in the UK as most of its stories are bait often being poorly researched and only published to create controversy. The paper is said to be right-wing whilst Mail Online leans towards leftist views.
The worst part of Mail Online is that the comment section is filled with utter stupidity and filth from whoever posts on them. The comment section is r/atheism blended with 4/chan trolling, left wing stupidity and YouTube comments with a sprinkle of racism and plain stupidity. The "moderation" of comments only takes place on some news stories and the "moderation" is really an automatic system which prevents spam, you will still see ToS violation comments getting published and while the content filter will prevent comments with swears words getting published people get past that by censoring such words.
Guest_Lathrim_*
More daddy issues than ME2, to be honest.
One of us!
Whether we should be happy about it is, of course, a different matter altogether. 
Guest_simfamUP_*
Ooooh!
Ooooh!
Phoenix reminded me of something.
This chick.
I don't like her.
She's unpleasant.
And probably smells of way too much perfume.
"Mail Online" aka the DailyMail's website
The DailyMail is the worst newspaper in the UK as most of its stories are bait often being poorly researched and only published to create controversy. The paper is said to be right-wing whilst Mail Online leans towards leftist views.
The worst part of Mail Online is that the comment section is filled with utter stupidity and filth from whoever posts on them. The comment section is r/atheism blended with 4/chan trolling, left wing stupidity and YouTube comments with a sprinkle of racism and plain stupidity. The "moderation" of comments only takes place on some news stories and the "moderation" is really an automatic system which prevents spam, you will still see ToS violation comments getting published and while the content filter will prevent comments with swears words getting published people get past that by censoring such words.
the Sun is way worse than the Mail lol....WAY WAY worse
Guest_simfamUP_*
The Sun has naked chicks.
It's slightly better.
That being said.
It should have naked dudes.
To make things fair for everybody.
The Sun has naked chicks.
It's slightly better.
That being said.
It should have naked dudes.
To make things fair for everybody.
Uh-huh.
Guest_???_*
Call of Duty.
Also, when the post office loses packages.
Guest_greengoron89_*
This actually kinda goes hand-in-hand with the type of people AutumnWitch described but I'd like to throw Nice Guys™ into the mix here.
Now I know everyone has probably been "there" at least once in their lives, but I've known way too many people both online and off who constantly mope about how girls always choose "jerks" over them and how they always get put in the "friend zone." I'm not talking about teenagers either which is not unusual, but fully grown men in their 20s and 30s. It's starting to reach epidemic proportions it seems like.
This is a prime example of what I'm talking about:
Get a grip already. Damn.
the Sun is way worse than the Mail lol....WAY WAY worse
Nope. The Sun is not the paper I read but to say it's worst than the Mail? The Mail is the only one that has lied that much and purposely gotten their facts wrong (and still continue to do so) for nothing but click-bait.
The Sun has naked chicks.
It's slightly better.
That being said.
It should have naked dudes.
To make things fair for everybody.
The "naked" women are topless. They show topless men too if there's a picture of a male celebrity on the beach or something. Sounds like you're asking to see their dicks instead. In which case there's sites for that.
Guest_simfamUP_*
The "naked" women are topless. They show topless men too if there's a picture of a male celebrity on the beach or something. Sounds like you're asking to see their dicks instead. In which case there's sites for that.
Taking my nonsense a bit too seriously there.
Guest_simfamUP_*
This actually kinda goes hand-in-hand with the type of people AutumnWitch described but I'd like to throw Nice Guys™ into the mix here.
Now I know everyone has probably been "there" at least once in their lives, but I've known way too many people both online and off who constantly mope about how girls always choose "jerks" over them and how they always get put in the "friend zone." I'm not talking about teenagers either which is not unusual, but fully grown men in their 20s and 30s. It's starting to reach epidemic proportions it seems like.
This is a prime example of what I'm talking about:
Get a grip already. Damn.
lol those guys.
I'm a horrible person when it comes to relationships.
But yeah... those guys.
Kind of like these guys.
The "attention seekin horse" I mean.
And now I'm self-righteous, and a paragon on the BSN!
I'm moving down in the world...
You mean you aren't David returned returned to teach us the ways of heroism and righteousness? What a shame. That's far more potential entertainment than yet another poster who thinks their snide remarks are clever. Surely nobody could get the impression you're holding a bit of a grudge when you randomly accuse them of being everything they hate.
You should really try the characters and romance forums, I'm sure you'd fit right in with all of the fanboys acting like upset housewives over something or another.
Recon, quit it and just go look at lewd pictures of the Moon Equine.
Retour en haut