Ce sujet est fermé
No, equality in society has nothing to do with "rights". Equality means everyone is treated equally. It is literally the same word. Nothing about "rights". "Equal rights" means everyone has the same rights, not equality. You are factually incorrect about the definition of the word. You can argue whether you think these things are important, or whether you think things are equal, but you can't "argue" equality implies "rights".
I'm not sure what you're trying to say with your second paragraph, it's very confusing for me to read. It sounds like you think tone and point are related?
"The sky is blue"
"The sky is blue, you ****** piece of ****"
These two statements have the same POINT, but very different TONE.
When people ask for an "equal society" they ask for a society where people have equal rights, not one where everyone is treated equally in everything. Wanting everyone to be treated equally in everything is repulsive and forced. You're not going to be treated equally with a friend of mine in the question of "who will I invite at my home tonight" ,and you're also not going to be treated equally with people with similar tastes as me in the question of "who will the art I create appeal to" . Both of these "inequalities" are fine. Because , while they're inequalities they don't violate your rights. Inequalities that don't violate your rights are fine.
The question you have to ask yourself is if you consider "having art that appeals to my demographic being created in equal amount as art that appeals to my demographic" is within your rights, or not.
For my second paragraph.
"The sky is blue and we can prove this by measuring the reflected wavelength, looking up, etc."
"The sky is blue , you f***ing shitlord, how dare you say it isn't."
I don't think it's soloely a tone issue. It's a how you argue issue. They both have the same point though, the sky is blue, so it's not only about their point.
Retour en haut
