...in so many ways, is to go find the templars, and then make them disband and join the inquisition outright. Hold on, don't get mad, here's my logic:
My first playthrough I went to meet Fiona and did the whole Alexius time magic thing. One of the differences I noted is that the introduction of Cole vs Dorian makes WAAAAAAAY more sense and is far less confusing if you go with the Templars. Dorian was fine when I went with the mages, but Cole was just like, uhhhh what? Who? Huh?
Meanwhile Cole's intro in the Templar mission is perfect, and really eases you into his whole thing. And then Dorian's intro is perfectly fine too and well explained. Hey, I'm a good tevinter mage coming to warn you that all of your mages have been taken over by bad tevinter mages! Makes perfect sense! Then there's the kinda gamey *you wouldn't know about it ahead of time* choice that by choosing the templars, you've chosen the hard-counter, as it were, to the enemy you will now mainly fight. Whereas in choosing the mages, you choose to BE hard countered.
These and other smaller things just make it seem like the templar choice is what bioware initially thought out, and the mage choice was somehow later molded to be an alternative.
Granted though....TIME TRAVEL IS AWESOME, so, there's that for the mage choice.
Thoughts?





Retour en haut








