Cass's solutions seems like the best one. Trying to go back to the old system obviously doesn't work, that's how we got the war. Leliana goes too far too fast.
Mages have a big bonus in their favour if the Inquisitor/Chosen of Andraste was a mage.
The ideal system would be Circles where mages rule themselves, deal harshly with blood magic and crime amongst their members and Templars and Seekers take over a Circle temporarily if they fail to rule themselves well. All Mage children need to be taught by a Circle Mage though that doesn;t nesscessarily mean seperating them from their family. Dalish can deal with their own business so long as they're away from civilisation
(Note that Circle can be a governing body for a specific area, not nesscessarily a single communal building).
That ending is just nonsensical. Before Inquisition, after Kirkwall, people wouldn't look at a mage without lynching them and now the Divine herself was killed in the very same manner, the mage rebellion sold those granting them refuge to Tevinter and mages from the Venatori and Grey Wardens nearly took over Southern Thedas.
And we are supposed to believe that, after all this, there is any near future where mages can leave the protection of the Inquisition and not only survive but be respected?
I understand and don't oppose the need to havê a pro-mage ending but this is an insult to our intelligence.
Because Mages in the Inquistion including a possible Mage Herald of Andraste took them down.
Also without templars what will mage haters do? Mobs struggle to deal with people capable of flinging fire and if they are living comunually in a fortified tower like most circles are they're invulnerable to anything except templar lead military assaults.
Also since the mages can have more contact with the people that buys them good favour if they offer healing to the poor or protection if they work for nobles.





Retour en haut





