231 réponses à ce sujet

[Shelidon]

I haven't read all the books, but from the games I don't get that feeling either. There are attractive and powerful ladies in TW2 where there is no interest from either side - Sile, Saskia, Anezka, nor does the majority of less prominent female NPCs show much interest. Whether a female inquisitor would find him attractive is absolutely up to her...I'm pretty sure he hasn't got magical pheronomes or anything.

Actually, if you read the books, there is something about witchers being extremely pleasant to touch, at least for witches.
They are good books. I mean, they are actual books, not fanfiction inspired by a videogame.

[hong]

[Vegeta 77]

Geralt has a lot more experience would say his better with a sword and his abilities and potions would give him the edge so geralt would win.

[Spirited Treasure]

Geralt of course.

[MarakaiBen]

If the Inquisitor would be a warrior/rouge- Geralt by the book

 

If the Inqusitor would be a mage- Inquisitor by the book/DA world

 

In the books Geralt almost always looses to mages (once he killed one but from behind while he was distracted) or is easy taken down by their CC spells. Witchers are immune to charms and can sense magic (so they can predict spells being casted). However powerful charms (like Yennefer did to him in "Ostanie Życzenie" book) would easy take control of him.

 

Geralt has superior reflex, strength, speed, stamina, regeneration (but not Wolverine ) and combat abilities (plus he is really talented with swords) but his "magic" for true wizards is just joke (what Triss and Yennefer said many times in books). Their magic is enchanced in gamesto be usefull, but in books is weak and used only for small support in combat. Besides Geralt almost never use them.

 

He is able to dodge arrows and deflect them in air, but he would not dodge lightning or bear with being immolated.

 

However in books mages need time to cast spells, so taking in account Geralts speed- it be possible to him to kill wizard first. Normal human would not. In Dragon Age world however where casting spells is just waving hand or staff and BUM!- Geralt would be smashed. Judging by books of course... In games? Depends on HP, gear, STATS, stuns and stealth/guard mechanics .

 

Source: I am from Poland, read all books like 7 times ^^.

[Angarma]

I just hope Geralt will have better armor then the inquisitor. I swear to God I will go mad if I have to run in trenchcoats again...

Spoiler

 

Oh shits! Is this some sort of fantasy fashion trend?

We all knew Duncan never died at Ostagar. It is known.
 

[Frraksurred]

Well I've read all the Witcher books (that have been translated to English), but I've yet to read any DA books. In the games I enjoyed the Inquisitor, but felt much more invested in Geralt's struggle (maybe because I'm a father of young adult daughters) then the Quizzy. Regardless of who is "better" at any particular skill, I'd be rooting for Geralt in the end.

[Ascendra]

What about Bhaalspawn... In Ravager form...

[Dutch]

The Witcher has objectively better writing than Dragon Age. So, Geralt it is.

[errantknight]

The Inquisitor, duh.

All the inquisitor would have to do is open a rift in the Witcher's head. The fight would be over before it started, no badass posturing required.

 

Doubt they'd be fighting in the first place, though, lol.

[MrSnoozer]

'My Da is better than your Da' its not biased its facts!

[Hadeedak]

Vanguard Shepard with charge/melee spec. From ME3. 

 

I'm just saying, that was the most evil headbuttingly destructive a game has ever allowed me to be. And it's SHEPARD. Esperanza Shepard could take apart all my other protagonists like tissue paper. ...I'm not purely biased by addictive vanguard game mechanics. Nope. This is an unbiased opinion.

 

Alternatively, Captain Marvel or Captain Marvel. But not that chump, Captain Mar-vell. I'm glad he's dead.

[InfinitePaths]

The Witcher has objectively better writing than Dragon Age. So, Geralt it is.

 

Art can never be objectively better.Art is entirely subjective.

[Aren]

Erm...The Warden is just a man/woman who can sense darkspawn.

 

The Witcher has 100+ years of training, potions that give him superhuman powers and magical signs.

 

The Inquisitor can open a huge rift that swallows everything around it into the fade.

 

Yeah...I think the Warden is kinda outmatched, no?

I dont know  the Anchor is a gift granted to the Inquisitor by someone else, The warden have fought only with His/her determination  without being an  accident leader from the Beginning.

Beside the taint allow pretty much  some hidden power that no one  knows,     like  use magic  without being a mage just like the emissary of the darkspawn.

Regarding the witcher is obvious that there isn't any competition  between the three of  them, the  boy is pretty  much the Super-man of    his  universe.

[devilnevercry2]

If the Inquisitor would be a warrior/rouge- Geralt by the book

 

If the Inqusitor would be a mage- Inquisitor by the book/DA world

 

In the books Geralt almost always looses to mages (once he killed one but from behind while he was distracted) or is easy taken down by their CC spells. Witchers are immune to charms and can sense magic (so they can predict spells being casted). However powerful charms (like Yennefer did to him in "Ostanie Życzenie" book) would easy take control of him.

 

Geralt has superior reflex, strength, speed, stamina, regeneration (but not Wolverine ) and combat abilities (plus he is really talented with swords) but his "magic" for true wizards is just joke (what Triss and Yennefer said many times in books). Their magic is enchanced in gamesto be usefull, but in books is weak and used only for small support in combat. Besides Geralt almost never use them.

 

He is able to dodge arrows and deflect them in air, but he would not dodge lightning or bear with being immolated.

 

However in books mages need time to cast spells, so taking in account Geralts speed- it be possible to him to kill wizard first. Normal human would not. In Dragon Age world however where casting spells is just waving hand or staff and BUM!- Geralt would be smashed. Judging by books of course... In games? Depends on HP, gear, STATS, stuns and stealth/guard mechanics .

 

Source: I am from Poland, read all books like 7 times ^^.

Fellow reader of the books, but you discredit Geralt a bit. He doesn't almost always lose to sorcerers. Most of the times magic has messed him up he wasn't in direct combat with them. The only sorcerer that really took him down in 1 on 1 was Vilgefortz, but he's more than just some mage, he's THE mage. When Geralt did finally defeat him sure he had help in the beginning by Yennifer but she was taken down, a testament to Vilgefortz power. Vilgefortz also had the benefit of having his power enhanced in Stygga Castle. If we include the games story he has victory over several other powerful sorcerers under his belt. 

 

While true sorcerers do consider signs a joke, it's not in the way you suggest in that they're any less useful in combat. And they're quick. And as shown, before a sorcerer can get off a powerful spell he could have their head, or like the game with Dethmold break their arm. The spells in DA for the most part are quick save for the more special ones, but it's not an automatic win for them. If it were we wouldn't see nonmages killing mages. Geralt could be able to dodge them plus he has a sign giving a magical defense

 

Not saying this means he would win, just being fair.

[Lukas Trevelyan]

For some reason I felt more connected to Geralt than with the Inquisitor. Now THIS is telling something.

For some reason I feel no connection what so ever to Geralt. In fact I despise the character. Now THIS is telling something. 

[Lukas Trevelyan]

Since we're comparing Geralt to the Inquisitor, why don't we also add Yu Narukami? I prefer him to the both of them *shrugs* 

If anyone wants to add another protagonist who follows an entirely different gameplay style but exists within a RPG feel free to! 

[Maniccc]

On my PC, Quizziy wins, because Geralt is not installed, can't show up to the fight, and loses by default.

[Lukas Trevelyan]

*snip*

In all fairness. All the Inquisitor has to do is rip open a rift that'll swallow Geralt alive before he even has a chance to do anything. That's one ability, that's ridiculously powerful no matter how much focus you have. 

[MrMrPendragon]

Rift powers win.

 

This fight is like that Raiders of the Lost Ark scene where the sword guy flips and twirls his sword, and Indy just shoot him.

 

Except in this case, Geralt comes out looking like a badass, pulling his Steel sword and whatnot, but the Inquisitor just opens a Fade Rift right above him and Geralt gets sucked off - and not in a good way.

[luism]

Dagger rogue hawk would kill him in less than 4 hits, archer inquisitor would kite him and have him looking sillier than he already does in his white wig.

But the hero of ferelden at least my hero of ferelden would ser Landry him.

Sure I'll duel you 1 v 1 , psych! you die now fool Morrigan, Leliana, Sten,dog beat the living I sh out of this white haired clown!

[ThreeF]

This whole "opening rifts in people" thing needs to be disregarded.  If that was normally possible, my Inky would have been doing it all the damned  time

 

You sort of doing it all the damn time, you just need focus.

[Bfler]

Rift powers win.

 

This fight is like that Raiders of the Lost Ark scene where the sword guy flips and twirls his sword, and Indy just shoot him.

 

Except in this case, Geralt comes out looking like a badass, pulling his Steel sword and whatnot, but the Inquisitor just opens a Fade Rift right above him and Geralt gets sucked off - and not in a good way.

 

Geralt would stun the Inquisitor with the Aard sign and then kill him and even if the Inquisitor would be able to open a rift, the Quen sign makes Geralt invulnerable against the effect.