Funnily enough I was playing the assassin followed by the alchemist
Do you understand software development? If I as a developer provide you with some functionality that works in some scenarios but not in others (with the key point that it should) then the functionality is inherently broken. It does matter if it works 10 or 90% of the time, if there is a scenario where functionality should work but doesn't then it is broken.
OP made a broad statement which was inherently correct, he said armour was broken in the game, he didn't say armour is broken on all kits which you seemed to have assumed.
So you mean to tell me that "Armor is broken in multiplayer" is supposed to be interpreted as "Armor for 2 out of the 12 classes is broken"? Are you seriously accusing me of "assuming incorrectly"? You didn't know what the actual issue was even about until I explained it to you. You could've just been like "Oh I misunderstood, my bad", but you really want to keep this going for some reason.
You claiming that there's no distinction of context when presenting data based claims is flat out incorrect so that whole "developer observation" doesn't show anything except that you don't understand that concept. In fact that's a good way to get your research claims dismissed immediately. You're also acting like I'm just making wild assumptions and that the statement "Armor is broken in multiplayer" isn't vague enough to be interpreted as "ALL armor is broken in multiplayer" is somehow a personal problem of mine. It's ridiculous and you're obviously not trying to give any credibility to my point, just debate aimlessly about something we already both agree on. YES, armor IS broken in Multiplayer...it's broken on the Reaver and Katari. That last bit is an important distinction regardless of what you think.
Retour en haut
