Comparing him to other DA villain hes definitely not the worst. Archdemon was just a "special snowflake" imo a burnt rotting one but hardly anything special.
Then you've got Lohgain who is by all rights more incompetent as far as I'm concerned. Sure he fled the field but I accept that as experience telling him to save his men rather than follow a fool but after that he starts howling at the moon like Orlesians are gonna jump out every bush
Then comes the DA2 where....there wasn't really a villain as far as I'm concerned. While some may argue the Templars, I say how many blood mages did Hawke kill daily?Both Meredith and the Arishok were somewhat justified in their actions so the real villains...Isabela and Anders?
So as far as Corypheus goes both he and the Archdemon are perhaps the only real villains in the series so yep hes the best. Hell he basically took the mages,templars, and wardens bent them over and ass raped them one after another. Name another villain that did that
The archdemon and darkspawn in general are better 'villains' because they were used in a way like how many literary epics used 'great evil force' rather than give characterization to a villain.
Simply, call it the 'Lovecraftian' effect. The Archdemon/darkspawn were less villains (though they were by all means) but more forces of nature that the protagonist must push and fight against. Forces of nature are powerful simply because immediately the protagonist is given a nearly impossible task to overcome and when they do overcome and the work they put in to overcome that, it becomes immensely satisfying that the journey they've taken, the power they've accrued is paid off.
One of the problems with Mass Effect, for example, is the characterization of the main antagonists, the Reapers. Suddenly a force of nature had a face and because it had a face the agencies of fear and doubt and the psychological reasoning on the part of the player as to their motivation was lost. In other words, explaining the motivations of an antagonist that the protagonist cannot relate to in any way has the effect of lessening the antagonist's threat. This is one of a myriad of reasons why the ending/Catalyst was simply abhorrent writing.
On the other hand, Loghain was a great villain, because he was human, and had human flaws. His obsession with Orlais came from his experiences during the war, as well as his dislike for the Wardens. If none of Loghain's actions were explained, and that people in the world tried to understand why he retreated, then he would also fail as a villain, because he would be one who would need a 'face', vs. the Archdemon who from it's physical appearances to the lore related to darkspawn would be perfectly fine as an engine of destruction.
Corypheus starts off as a Loghain, where we almost get his motivation-what he experienced and saw in the Golden City-and then without context or urgency, becomes an Archdemon only spouting Saturday morning villain level dialogue that has no effect on the protagonist at all. To compare Cory to the Archdemon is apples to oranges, as you're inherently asking for two separate types of prose to be juxtaposed next to each other without any background or context.





Retour en haut






