236 Antworten in diesem Thema

[tklivory]

Sure! Feel free to pass it to important people 

Thank you!

[tklivory]

By golly. They've issued a hotfix for Patch 9 already. Can someone test it? I'm not at home, and I don't have access to my gaming computer.

[Rascoth]

By golly. They've issued a hotfix for Patch 9 already. Can someone test it? I'm not at home, and I don't have access to my gaming computer.

Just give me a second and I'll check it out.

 

Edit: Works! 

[tklivory]

Just give me a second and I'll check it out.
 
Edit: Works!

Woo hoo! Thanks!

[Katiekat]

I'm having issues with SweetFX not saving that extra screenshot. It's set to the screenshot button but i only get the low res normal one.

 

Anyone got any ideas on what to tweak? It's nowhere to be found in my game directory.

 

Thank you!

[PIT_DEFENDER]

If i have Tresspasser Iam on patch 9 or 10 ?

[Rascoth]

If i have Tresspasser Iam on patch 9 or 10 ?

Patch 10 

[Aneira]

I hope someone here can help me, I have wasted all of my Sunday for this and cannot find a solution.

 

I use RadeonPro do inject SweetFx into DAI, but when I'm ingame pressing the toggle button, only the notification in the top right corner shows up that says "Sweet FX On / Off". But: There is no visible change. I tried to change the preset to something really bold so it would have to pop, but nothing changes. I can't for the life of me find out what the problem is.

 

I'm on Windows 10 now; before that I used RadeonPro and the same injector and preset on Win 7 and it worked like a charm.

 

When trying to use RP after the change to Win 10 it made the game crash upon starting, but I managed to correct that via installing/repairing the DirectX that was installed. After that I uninstalled and re-installed RP, setting it up freshly and setting up the DAI profile to use SweetFx.

 

Installing SweetFx manually or using the Configurator does not help either, no changes are visible. And trying to install the preset manually makes my game unable to start because of some weird dll missing error (I don't remember the exact error message that I got, I just uninstalled SweetFx from the DAI-folder and that problem was gone).

 

Sooo ... Anyone have any idea what the problem might be?

[Dooq]

Try http://reshade.me/

 

It's a new injector for shaders (including sweetfx) that fixes the compatibility issues the old ones had.

[Aneira]

Try http://reshade.me/

 

It's a new injector for shaders (including sweetfx) that fixes the compatibility issues the old ones had.

 

Thank you so much - it's working again!

[catabuca]

Here is a comparison of a 21:9 image at 1920x810 (same pixel density as 1080p) and 6144x2592 (same pixel density as 3072p, or 6K resolution).

Pay attention to the grasses and fern fronds. See how they separate, become less choppy and more distinct. The whole scene gains clarity, as well as depth.

When you're taking shots at lower resolutions, the game is trying to render a lot of information with a small amount of pixels, so some of that information gets lost. That's why you don't see gaps in between the fern fronds, or why grass looks like it has choppy bits missing all the way along each blade. When you go up in resolution, the game is rendering the same amount of information with a greater amount of pixels at its disposal, so those extra pixels can fill in the gaps.

That 6144x2592 picture is 16MP. Scenes with lots of foliage can really benefit from that kind of size. However, bloom doesn't scale well at all, so 8-12MP seems to be a sweet spot for most things. A standard aspect ratio of 16:9 at 4K resolution is 8.3MP. 5K is 14.7MP. 6K is 18.9MP. By comparison, 1080p is 2.1MP, and 1440p is 3.7MP.

You'll see shadows also get darker and tighter when the resolution increases. If you're using something like ReShade and intend to hotsample, you should account for that when adjusting your shadows.

[Ava Grey]

edit no. 2

 

I realised what the problem was as soon as switched over to the laptop to use the internet ( damn kids playing fallout 4 ). On the laptop all four screenshots look exactly the same. Cue much embarrassment on my part. A couple of weeks ago the PC was hooked up to to the television and I had this forum double zoomed . I'd completely forgotten to change it back when it went back on the monitor. That appears to be my issue 

 

If you want to point and laugh, I chucked the original post, and my embarrassment under a spoiler.

 

Spoiler

Quick question for those far more knowlegable than myself.

 

Following the guides and tips here and in other places, i've been playing with hotsampling the past couple of days and I think i've finally started getting a handle on it for the most part, except for one thing.

 

How does everyone retain clarity of their images when posting here?.

 

As an example, the following image was reduced to 600 x 800, then upped to 3000 x 4000, then re-sampled back down to 600 x 800.

 

Spoiler

 

What i'm seeing in the posted picture is a degradation in quality from the final image that I don't see in other posters shots but if I link to it directly it shows correctly? 

 

http://imgur.com/rxv3lK1.png

 

I understand that the display difference between the posted and linked images are the probably the culprit but...ugh, what part of the process am I getting wrong and/ or completely misunderstanding?

 

edit:

 

A better example is this one. Again it was set to 600 x 800 but upped to 2250 x 3000, then re-sampled back to 600 x 800

 

Spoiler

 

Looks like someone went crazy with a pot of vaseline.

 

Yet in the direct link: http://imgur.com/sWjuHYO.png

 

I'd understand the difference if I was linking the original unsampled image but i'm not, both the posted and linked ones are exactly the same image, yet the posted ones are obviously worse.

 

Even if it's just to tell i'm being a dummy somewhere, help!