Z and I just happen to disagree about just about everything, ever. I'm giving him a hard time about it because I enjoy doing that.
I'll answer the second question though.
Lambert was a short-sighted megalomaniac.
I disagree about short-sighted in fact lambert was only character in book that could see nasty consequences of divine and mages doings and that it would lead to chaos.Lambert was guy who cleaned mess but divine caused mess again.
You're a Cerberus fan, a Lambert fan, and you sided with Petrice.
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if Dolores Umbridge was your favorite Happy Potter character and your favorite food was fermented shark.
You should stick it out to the fifth book, Z. Umbridge is right up your alley. She's a megalomaniac who believes in order and will do anything to achieve it. She's a bit like Lambert, if Lambert were a mage and had a habit of torturing children.
(actually I'm being unfair to Lambert. I hate the guy but I would pick him over Umbridge every time...)
(actually I'm being unfair to Lambert. I hate the guy but I would pick him over Umbridge every time...)
I'm not sure I like all of Lambert's methods, but unlike Umbridge he was at least reacting to a salient threat.
You guys make a good point.
I almost wonder if comparing her to Cerberus was being a little too hard on Cerberus, as well.
I'm not sure I like all of Lambert's methods, but unlike Umbridge he was at least reacting to a salient threat.
I'm suprised theres still Lambert fans about after the revelations from DAI
I'm suprised theres still Lambert fans about after the revelations from DAI
The Wardens stay. That is all.
I think Weekes wasted an excellent character.
I agree.
Having Lambert in Inquisition would've been great.
As what? A corpse? Lambert is clearly dead by the time Inquisition takes place. It was pretty darn obvious from the end of Asunder that Cole murdered him. And how is it Weekes fault? It was Gaider who killed of Lambert.
Gaider left it ambiguous.
Weekes finished it.
Relatively simple.
Even if it was left ambiguous it was still pretty obvious that he was dead
Even if it was left ambiguous it was still pretty obvious that he was dead
I would have liked having Lambert in Inquisition.
I think I would have enjoyed that boss fight.
Having not read Asunder it would of been interesting to have him in the game, he certainly seems more interesting than Lucius.
nah bro DAO was best game
save wardens all the time everyday
As what? A corpse? Lambert is clearly dead by the time Inquisition takes place. It was pretty darn obvious from the end of Asunder that Cole murdered him. And how is it Weekes fault? It was Gaider who killed of Lambert.
I like Dave of Canada's idea from the past:
I'd like to imagine Lambert as being in a coma or vegetative state, being preserved and kept secret to prevent the Templar from defecting. The irony of the situation being that only magic could save him.
But beyond that, his fate was kept ambiguous. Even World of Thedas said he was "missing in action" only, rather then straight killed. I mean, really, if Cole killed him.... why was he reported missing for so many years? What, did Cole chop up Lambert's body into little pieces, throw him in acid, drop it in the ocean, and then sick an iceberg on top of it for good measure?
I can only assume the higher ranking Seekers and Templars deliberately kept that info to themselves so as to not destabilize their infrastructure.
I would have liked having Lambert in Inquisition.
I think I would have enjoyed that boss fight.
I can just imagine some of his boss banter:
"I will not see this land fall to chaos and corruption! The past will not repeat itself!"
"You shortsighted fools!"
and other things in line with him.
Also Lambert probably would've been on board with curbstomping Corypheus.
I disagree about short-sighted in fact lambert was only character in book that could see nasty consequences of divine and mages doings and that it would lead to chaos.Lambert was guy who cleaned mess but divine caused mess again.
Alright, fine.
Lambert was an irritating megalomaniac.
I have no idea why he's listed as MIA in WoT. But what did you think Cole did there at the end? Changed his mind at the last minute and then they had tea and biscuits?
I do agree that it would've been nice to fight him as a boss battle. The pro Templar's got to kill Fiona, while we had to settle for a random Templar. That's not fair!
I didn't think Cole stopped his attempt, but Lambert hardly struck me as the type of guy who wouldn't put up a fight or be afraid of Cole. Granted I can't find my copy of Asunder right now so I can't check the ending but even so.... I didn't expect Lambert to be put down without a fight.
Alright, fine.
Lambert was an irritating megalomaniac.
Rather awsome best character in that book only one that was thinking about consequences and in fact almost got sh*** done but corrupted and stupid divine along with leliana foiled that.
Shame that we couldn't hang leliana for causing mage-templar war.
Rather awsome best character in that book only one that was thinking about consequences and in fact almost got sh*** done but corrupted and stupid divine along with leliana foiled that.
Shame that we couldn't hang leliana for causing mage-templar war.
You and Z were practically made for each other.
You and Z were practically made for each other.
I'd ship it lol 
Retour en haut