If polygamy becomes a cause celebre then not only will BioWare embrace it but you'll have a game where a ton of the npcs are polygamist and we'll have a polygamist companion to lecture us.
You have straight and gay choices, but can you have polygamy?
#126
Posté 18 janvier 2015 - 07:54
- Broganisity et Colonelkillabee aiment ceci
#127
Posté 18 janvier 2015 - 09:29
#128
Posté 18 janvier 2015 - 09:37
Complications within the game mainly. They barely do an adequate job recognizing one romance, let alone one with people all in a relationship together simultaneously.
#129
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 01:54
If they added in a poly romance it would probably be with two other companions. Who are in a relationship with each other and both of them like you. Well that would probably be the easiest way to write it anyway. So the fangirls/boys don't get all jelly about how they feel that their MC isn't getting enough love.
#130
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:11
Geralt of Rivia, is that you? LOL
**** Triss Marysue Ves should have been the official romance especially when you can sort of two time Triss with Ves x.x
#131
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:12
**** Triss Marysue Ves should have been the official romance especially when you can sort of two time Triss with Ves x.x
You do, I don't.
I've yet to do the Roche side anyway. I will eventually though, but it's hard to pass up knowing who dragonlady is. And I love the elves and dwarves.
- _Lucinia aime ceci
#132
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:13
You had that in NWN HotU.
#133
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:14
You do, I don't.
I've yet to do the Roche side anyway. I will eventually though, but it's hard to pass up knowing who dragonlady is. And I love the elves and dwarves.
I kill Saskia.
Her rebellion was a joke anyway.
Also Geralt has no business playing revolutionary.
He's a ****ing mercenary.
#134
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:17
You do, I don't.
I've yet to do the Roche side anyway. I will eventually though, but it's hard to pass up knowing who dragonlady is. And I love the elves and dwarves.
You should Roche is such a bro.
#135
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:17
I kill Saskia.
Her rebellion was a joke anyway.
Also Geralt has no business playing revolutionary.
He's a ****ing mercenary.
He's a man and he can decide to be whatever he wants. That's what free will is for.
I killed Saskia too the first few times, but my canon run will let her live, since we'll obviously be able to free her later. And Geralt doesn't kill dragons, as he said
Free will and all, but I use that to justify letting her live, same as you justify his merc status to kill her.
More than one way to interpret things. And I don't think the rebellion was a joke, it just needs a helping hand.
#136
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:18
bioware said that if they ever do polygamy.Then you (the protagonist), would join in on a already established relationship.
I personally say yeah, why not? I like to try new stuff. I would also like to see how bioware would handle it.
- RenAdaar aime ceci
#137
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:18
You should Roche is such a bro.
I know, I like him too
He's on the wrong side though. Such is war.
#138
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:18
You should Roche is such a bro.
He's better then a dirty little squirrel anyway.
#139
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:19
He's better then a dirty little squirrel anyway.
That dirty little squirrel is badass. They always were imo.
#140
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:20
- Broganisity et Colonelkillabee aiment ceci
#141
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:20
They say Witchers have no need to plow, did you know that?
LOL someone should have told Geralt...
#142
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:21
That dirty little squirrel is badass. They always were imo.
They were a tool, a useful tool but just a tool.
#143
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:22
LOL someone should have told Geralt...
It's actual in game dialogue.
#144
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:28
It's actual in game dialogue.
Durr I'm aware, that idiot repeats it 10000 times.
#145
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:30
Or those idiots actually. Got the npc dialogue mixed with that guy singing PLOUGH EM ALL!
#146
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 02:32
They were a tool, a useful tool but just a tool.
They're badass ![]()
edit: Excuse the sucky gameplay, was in a hurry to make that to show the end dialogue.
#147
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 03:52
Honestly their only usefulness was to Nilfgaard during the invasion since then they have done nothing besides acting like ***holes and hiding in the woods.
...They remind me of the Dalish in that way i guess.
#148
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 04:01
God, here we go.
Why do you side with the Imperialistic assholes in these games? I'm surprised you're a Stormcloak fan tbh.
#149
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 04:24
God, here we go.
Why do you side with the Imperialistic assholes in these games? I'm surprised you're a Stormcloak fan tbh.
Long live the empire!
- RobRam10 aime ceci
#150
Posté 19 janvier 2015 - 05:13
God, here we go.
Why do you side with the Imperialistic assholes in these games? I'm surprised you're a Stormcloak fan tbh.
Nilfgaard is the only bastion of unified nations in the universe with a sound strategy.
The north isn't worth saving.
Inversely Ulfric presents the best threat against Thalmor aggression.
Also I find his politics agreeable.
But to answer the question.
The stormcloak movement is the only legitimate answer to the political situation.





Retour en haut







