366 réponses à ce sujet

[Bocochoco]

How about that most players would find it very uncomfortable...and those who don't...well that's just more uncomfortable...

Yeah and an entire nation of 1 billion people banning the game due to them being uncomfortable with gay sex yet gang rape women in broad daylight on a bus with steel pipes isn't?

[TheOgre]

I'm dead serious! Like it should have a very negative consequence but be realistic. A character that is optional would leave immediately and one might stab you in the back and another who isn't optional might stay and not do anything but have snide remarks to you from time to time and give you a base penalty in combat due to guilt or some crap until you beg for forgiveness.
I'm just saying, it would make things a little more interesting for sure.


Theres a lot more "special romancing" out there. Something like 1 in 4

How the **** did we get to this point? I'm sorry mom 8(

But liking for realism and grim dark.

[RINNZ]

Yeah, we do need a subject change. BACK TO THE LIMITED OPTIONS OF THE GREAT AND ALMIGHY HETEROSEXUAL MALE!

More diversity would be nice. Tired of romancing humans.

[HuldraDancer]

crazy/scary it is then. 

 

On topicish though I usually roll female player characters varying races in romance for male player characters would be nice. A dwarf LI in general would be great actually but this isn't really the thread for that I suppose.

[XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX]

Well, same sex relationships make people uncomfortable. It shouldn't, but it does.

Is a big difference between 2 same sex adults loving each other & rape/sexual assault

[Uccio]

Why not swap for a female IQ, then? i know many guys do that.

Thats the line I have never crossed, and probably never will. I've only played straight men and women.

[RINNZ]

Is a big difference between 2 same sex adults loving each other & rape/sexual assault

Is there a huge difference? Yes.

Does it still make people uncomfortable? Yes.

[XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX]

So many in this thread it seems....

[RINNZ]

And guys, realize that I am not a supporter of rape, nor do I disagree with same sex marriages. I was just pointing out something I saw and wanted to get a better understanding of.

[ThreeF]

Thats the line I have never crossed, and probably never will. I've only played straight men and women.

I see. Well, whatever floats your boat.

[RINNZ]

So many in this thread it seems....

So I'm a troll now? Is that all?

[Bocochoco]

How the **** did we get to this point? I'm sorry mom 8(
But liking for realism and grim dark.

We got here because of progressivism. It's the natural result of having no other causes to champion.
Not to mention, it's the simplest answer to the dilemma posed by this thread topic

[TheOgre]

So many in this thread it seems....

But the realism..

[nightscrawl]

My male human mage romanced Cassandra, which fits perfectly. I don't need any other romances. But I agree there weren't enough.

 

My idea from the start was to have a customizable love interest. Kind of like how you can go talk to Varric and go to the custom Hawke screen. Well, you should be able to go somewhere in Skyhold to create your custom romance.

 

Like, go to Josephine and she tells you that you have received numerous love letters from those all over Thedas. She has had them ordered and categorized. You then pick a letter out of categories, such as "From Females" or "From Males", then by race, then the love interest's sexual preference (either straight or bi, homosexual would obviously be determined by gender earlier on), and then finally by personality type. After that you could go to the custom character creator to determine what the love interest looks like. You could then have someone send for the person to be brought to Skyhold.

 

This romance could work out or not work out. Upon breaking it off, a new letter could be picked. Or if the romance is into threesomes you could pick another letter immediately.

 

Theoretically, you could start a harem.

 

Character reactions from Cassandra and Iron Bull would be particularly amusing in this case.

 

So... you wait a mail order bride/groom? That's kinda creepy.

[papercut_ninja]

1 in 4 victims of sexual assault. Not rape in particular but that is still more common than ****** sex.

 

With 100000 reported cases of sexual assault in the US every year, and between 10-15 million sexually active gay people in the US, even considering a large number of unreported cases, I don't think the number of incidents of sexual assault comes even close to the amount of consentual gay sex, unless gay people have suddenly become very chaste...
 

[Bocochoco]

So many in this thread it seems....

Whose trolling? I go on record to state my unequivocal support of natural behaviors in war like societies

[TheOgre]

So... you wait a mail order bride/groom? That's kinda creepy.

Haven't we already crossed that barrier with suggesting rape?? I mean come on..

[XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX]

So I'm a troll now? Is that all?

That wasn't directed at you, was in general from some of the posts in this thread

[Bocochoco]

With 100000 reported cases of sexual assault in the US every year, and between 10-15 million sexually active gay people in the US, even considering a large number of unreported cases, I don't think the number of incidents of sexual assault comes even close to the amount of consentual gay sex, unless gay people have suddenly become very chaste...

1 in 4 women
That's 25% of all women
3 to 5 in 100 women
That's the amount who claim to be gay/bisexual/other not straight

You do the math

Also you're math is flawed because your counting instances and if gays are as quick to suck your face as Dorian than I can't say they don't have sex more often than 2 billion cases of rape

[RINNZ]

That wasn't directed at you, was in general from some of the posts in this thread

Oh, well. Good to know.

[Uccio]

I see. Well, whatever floats your boat.

It would expand my gaming experience but the problem is I have zero interest for it.

[nightscrawl]

Haven't we already crossed that barrier with suggesting rape?? I mean come on..

 

I only just got to that in the thread, but I was going to ignore it anyway. There have been similar topics on the BSN before and they usually end with the thread getting locked. However, I hadn't seen the mail order bride suggestion before, which is why I commented on it.

 

I am 99.99999% positive that BW will never add the option to rape someone in their games. It's absurd. It's disgusting. It's completely offensive. And it appears to go against their philosophy of game development, particularly where the DA franchise is concerned. To me it is a pointless discussion.

[ThreeF]

It would expand my gaming experience but the problem is I have zero interest for it.

hmm? it's your game, you out to do what you want with it.

[RINNZ]

Well, I'm not saying give us the option to rape people. That's the stupidest ****** thing I've ever heard, and any developer would 've been destroyed if they gave us that choice.

I'm just saying that it's weird to me, that there aren't any instances of rape in this game.

[papercut_ninja]

1 in 4 women
That's 25% of all women
3 to 5 in 100 women
That's the amount who claim to be gay/bisexual/other not straight

You do the math

Also you're math is flawed because your counting instances and if gays are as quick to suck your face as Dorian than I can't say they don't have sex more often than 2 billion cases of rape

 

If you claim that sexual assualt is more common than gay sex, than yes, counting instances is the only way to compare that statement. Because being the victim of sexual assualt is an instance, it is not a sexuality or lifestyle - why are you comparing the two?