Aller au contenu

Photo

Bad, Bioware, Very Bad...


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
40 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Panda

Panda
  • Members
  • 7 471 messages

Yo Bioware I'm still in my pajamas after patch 3! Where is the patch for that? I'm getting sick of tired of looking at my undergarments! I will not shut up about it until it gets fixed.

 

Well it's not bug or clitch, it's designing flaw. So there is high chance it never get patched although it would be nice to at least be able to change the color of the that outfit.



#27
Bountron

Bountron
  • Members
  • 125 messages

They could at least offer a Skyhold Outfit DLC - 10 bucks and I am in haha



#28
turuzzusapatuttu

turuzzusapatuttu
  • Banned
  • 1 080 messages

tumblr_niijn4J2531rhh90ho1_1280.jpg

You, Sir, have just won the Internet. Bravo!


  • Dubya75 et Lord Raijin aiment ceci

#29
Dubya75

Dubya75
  • Members
  • 4 598 messages

It can't be "fixed" because it isn't broken. It's working as intended.

 

LOL you actually believe that running around Skyhold in your undergarments was intended? Nope.

One of the devs even admitted that they are aware of this BUG.

What you see yourself wearing at Skyhold is simply your character without armor. It should never have happened! IT IS A BUG!


  • TheOgre aime ceci

#30
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

You, Sir, have just won the Internet. Bravo!

 

LOL thanks :)

LOL you actually believe that running around Skyhold in your undergarments was intended? Nope.

One of the devs even admitted that they are aware of this BUG.

What you see yourself wearing at Skyhold is simply your character without armor. It should never have happened! IT IS A BUG!

It's such a shame that the developers hasn't taken the time to address the problem. I guess Bioware loves trolling us I suppose.


  • TheOgre aime ceci

#31
Gunslinger01101

Gunslinger01101
  • Members
  • 246 messages
Thats actually UNINTENDED?! And they LEFT it that way? I assumed it was like in ME2 and 3 where you wear your uniform or other selected clothing on the ship. I cant believe its a bug and has remained unaddressed fr THREE patches. Ridiculous.

#32
mesmerizedish

mesmerizedish
  • Members
  • 7 776 messages

LOL you actually believe that running around Skyhold in your undergarments was intended? Nope.
One of the devs even admitted that they are aware of this BUG.
What you see yourself wearing at Skyhold is simply your character without armor. It should never have happened! IT IS A BUG!

 
"One of the devs" admitted nothing. The official DA Twitter responded to someone saying they were aware of a bug, and that tweet was quickly deleted because it was factually inaccurate.
 
What you see at Skyhold is indeed your character without armor, which is what you have always been intended to see at Skyhold.


  • Grieving Natashina aime ceci

#33
Rawgrim

Rawgrim
  • Members
  • 11 532 messages

You know its PG-13 when the default "naked" inquisitor is covered up to his chin in clothes.



#34
Grieving Natashina

Grieving Natashina
  • Members
  • 14 554 messages

 
"One of the devs" admitted nothing. The official DA Twitter responded to someone saying they were aware of a bug, and that tweet was quickly deleted because it was factually inaccurate.
 
What you see at Skyhold is indeed your character without armor, which is what you have always been intended to see at Skyhold.

Sad but true.  I remember when the tweet came up and I remember it's deletion.  Someone had asked why we were in our underwear at Skyhold.  The dev originally took that to mean underwear as in DA:O/DA2, and wasn't referring to the Skyhold jammies.  Once it was realized that the person meant the causal clothes, the tweet was deleted.

 

I wish it was a bug, but it's intended.  :(



#35
Rawgrim

Rawgrim
  • Members
  • 11 532 messages

Sad but true.  I remember when the tweet came up and I remember it's deletion.  Someone had asked why we were in our underwear at Skyhold.  The dev originally took that to mean underwear as in DA:O/DA2, and wasn't referring to the Skyhold jammies.  Once it was realized that the person meant the causal clothes, the tweet was deleted.

 

I wish it was a bug, but it's intended.   :(

 

Where did you get that avatar picture you are using? It is very very cool.



#36
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 010 messages

I didn't love them.



#37
Ahalvern

Ahalvern
  • Members
  • 209 messages

Some people are just not cool enough to handle the greatness of Skyhold Pajamas. -_-



#38
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

Some people are just not cool enough to handle the greatness of Skyhold Pajamas. -_-

 

I rather be made tranquil then to wake up another day wearing those infamous Skyhold pajamas. At least I wouldn't need to suffer the embarrassment once the Rite has been completed.



#39
Gunslinger01101

Gunslinger01101
  • Members
  • 246 messages
But more importantly, half the abilities do not work! Lets be mad about that! Or...something...

#40
Dai Grepher

Dai Grepher
  • Members
  • 4 736 messages

Yes, it was a waste of time fixing the infinite influence exploit. People who don't want to ruin it for themselves, like me, will just avoid the exploit. On my second playthrough however, I will most definitely use this exploit, which is why I am not downloading patch 3.



#41
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 849 messages

You know its PG-13 when the default "naked" inquisitor is covered up to his chin in clothes.


Naked Warden and Hawke are not exactly R material. They are still technically clothed, just slightly less so. Male Hawke is still wearing pants.