It's not a logical either/or. It's not the baby or the blight. Why does it have to be worse? It just needs to be bad enough to be rejected. The US prevents both.
But on that note, mere mortals know how to stop a tainted old god. They don't know how to stop an untainted one. Whatever comes of it may be more subtle, but it could prove less tractable and ultimately prove more world changing because of it.
Who am I to put a god over men to save my own skin?
And could we please, please stop saying that the outcome of the ritual can not matter because it's optional and cannot be part of the plot? It's the same as every other outcome in DAO in being "optional". But that way, way misses the point. Saving Redcliffe village is optional. Killing the Dalish is optional. Preserving the anvil is optional.. I could go on and on . But these were still life or death situations for those caught up in them. They matter morally and narratively. You have to be pretty cold blooded to say that killing the Dalish tribe for example "doesn't matter". People lived or died, or may face curse or slavery, as part of the decisions you made.They are meaningful to the player. But it seems that the existence of the ogb may have no impact and that's what's ridiculous. (compare to preserving the anvil) Who's even been mildly inconvenienced? That's my problem.
As an aside, I do wonder why people fixate on the the whole "coercing Alistair to have sex with Morrigan" as being the morally objectionable part of the ritual itself. The really immoral part is that you are asking him to conceive a child specifically to be the subject of Morrigan's blood magic and to be interferred with on the level of its very essence. Using Alistair is one thing, he's and adult and can say no. Using his non consenting child in such a profound and dangerous manner is very much another. Of course, fathering it yourself is no better, but asking Alistair to do it means that he has to share the moral burden of what he might have done to his own child. (assuming you don't lie to him. And that of course, is one of the savage ironies of the ritual, in that you turn Alistair into a far, far worse father than Maric was to him - haha)
I agree.
Many DR runners such as "in Exile" belive that their choice is right and whoever avoid that path follow the route of wonky logic and mistrust.
It matters not if i do not want to persuade a good Friend like Alistair in doing a child a CHILD, when he doesn't want to, or Worse force Loghain to make sex when he has bad memories of his own mother being raped by the Orlesians.
Is really morally questionable to allow to an outside being to enter into another innocent Host just for Morrigan's selfish Desire.
OGB Kieran is pretty much like Flemeth a mortal who share his body with an ancient being "unlike Flemeth however he did not choose" ,his behaviour is different is mind is different, he is forced to be someone else other than himself like Flemeth was changed by Mythal and her desire of revenge to be forever someone else, is this good? Is good to alter the free will of someone for the sake of Power?
OGB Kieran is different from Human Kieran.
IS good to preserve a soul that is capable if corrupted to control an entire horde of Darkspawn ? Underestimate the power of an Old God soul just because is not an Archedemon is wonky logic.
Player like me who have rejected the ritual have already payed the price of DAO stupid Finale, because in order to avoid something that is repulsive and evil to my eyes i must sacrifice someone , and i don't like to sacrifice a Warden's soul EVEN the one of LOGHAIN, but to me is a better option than allow an innocent to be changed by another Being no matter how special the being is.