113758 réponses à ce sujet

[Lynroy: Final Edition]

The opening post.

Spoiler

Not counting the robot, there are only two female romance options and four make romances. I'm sure as hell not going to romance any of the males so this bothers me a bit that there aren't more female romance options. Seems like Beth is hung up on forcing people away from "traditional" boy, girl romance.

Edit: I just noticed the bolded.

Cheers, mate.

[Roamingmachine]

You know, I might be willing to forgive BLOPS3 for being on drugs for the second half of the game, if they didn't off the one character I actually enjoyed without any real meaning...

C'mon, it was only the last couple of missions that were like that

If we are thinking of the same character....

Spoiler

Rachel was your anchor to reality that Corvus needed to sever.  Of course killing her also unleashed the blood-raging lunatic that hated Corvus with the intensity of a thousand suns inside the pc so it wasn't the best thought-out plan but like Taylor said: "This AI really isn't that smart."

[Tragedienne of Heavens]

What?! Bethesda Forums always add the "Edited by" line after an edit? *nopes out*

[Serza]

Yeah. That'd be her.

 

And I just don't see how there is any point beyond "Whoops. Must create tension!"

[Serza]

What?! Bethesda Forums always add the "Edited by" line after an edit? *nopes out*

 

Can't be a sneaky Necro.

 

*agrees with the nope out*

[Roamingmachine]

Yeah. That'd be her.

 

And I just don't see how there is any point beyond "Whoops. Must create tension!"

 

It was there to really pull the rug from under the pc. After that she has nothing left and nothing to look forward to. For the rest of the narrative at the end to work, the death needed to happen *shrugs*

[Lynroy: Final Edition]

What?! Bethesda Forums always add the "Edited by" line after an edit? *nopes out*

Bioware forums used to be that way.

[Roamingmachine]

Home o'clock!

Awayyyyyy!

[Serza]

It was there to really pull the rug from under the pc. After that she has nothing left and nothing to look forward to. For the rest of the narrative at the end to work, the death needed to happen *shrugs*

 

I take it you played the first ever female CoD protagonist then. I watched a gameplay with a dude, though I doubt there was any real difference.

 

Still, why. The gas is contained. And how is it only possible to get rid of it from the BAD side? Isn't that kind of AGAINIST the entire point of logic? To have all the fail safes on the side the gas CAN NOT reach? What does it matter? What is even the point of it being there? WHAT IS THE POINT OF IT EVEN EXISTING AFTER ALL THIS TIME?

Why does she say something along the lines of "It tricked us"? Is there literally no reason for her to die? Was there actually a way to disable the threat from the outside?

 

One thing is true, BLOPS is trying to innovate. Choice and consequence in 2, female protag in 3. It's half-way, but they're trying. Too bad it looks like half the game's on drugs... I still might end up playing it. Once it drops price significantly (CoD1 and UO is still 20EUR after all these years)

[straykat]

Still not seeing how it's inferior.

 

I never expected you to.

 

There just aren't enough of fans like this to have made it worth it, I think. Perhaps they thought they'd get more open ended rpg fans or the Skyrim crowd, where disappointing the DA2 fans was a good risk. What they managed to do is create another division and two completely different types of fans.

[Roamingmachine]

I take it you played the first ever female CoD protagonist then. I watched a gameplay with a dude, though I doubt there was any real difference.

 

Still, why. The gas is contained. And how is it only possible to get rid of it from the BAD side? Isn't that kind of AGAINIST the entire point of logic? To have all the fail safes on the side the gas CAN NOT reach? What does it matter? What is even the point of it being there? WHAT IS THE POINT OF IT EVEN EXISTING AFTER ALL THIS TIME?

Why does she say something along the lines of "It tricked us"? Is there literally no reason for her to die? Was there actually a way to disable the threat from the outside?

 

One thing is true, BLOPS is trying to innovate. Choice and consequence in 2, female protag in 3. It's half-way, but they're trying. Too bad it looks like half the game's on drugs... I still might end up playing it. Once it drops price significantly (CoD1 and UO is still 20EUR after all these years)

 

Spoiler

It was chemical weapons research that that was a continuation from the Singapore facility.

The AI manipulated what the pc was seeing, including the the info about how the prevent the 'disaster'. It was all a lie, including the way to prevent it. The AI predicted that Rachel wouldn't let you die and would go in herself and then released the gas himself.

Also, tired of the 'on-drugs' argument now.

[straykat]

Bioware forums used to be that way.

 

My posts would be a damn mess if that was still the case.

[Serza]

Spoiler

It was chemical weapons research that that was a continuation from the Singapore facility.

The AI manipulated what the pc was seeing, including the the info about how the prevent the 'disaster'. It was all a lie, including the way to prevent it. The AI predicted that Rachel wouldn't let you die and would go in herself and then released the gas himself.

Also, tired of the 'on-drugs' argument now.

 

Spoiler

So they kept researching Nova Six since the end of the war/BLOPS1 then.

If the AI had access to the system, why didn't it just game over? Or did it show on a client-side basis (ie "glitch" in the optics?) - I'll have to admit, that isn't something I thought of checking. Then again, I didn't bother thinking much about what I considered a largely "WTF?!" plot.

Releasing the gas himself suggests the AI had access to the facility. WHY not game over the player? Why did the player even interface with anything knowing there is anything such that can jump to the other end?

 

There's still a lot of unexplained plot things I see as holes. Plug them for me?

 

Also, if you make something seem on drugs, give me a proper explanation. I never get a chance to understand the situation, the bad guy, and what's going on enough to consider accurately whether this on-drugness makes sense. If it does from some sort of stand point, then somebody's imagination went wild. You don't need drugs to make this up (By the Creators, I could testify) but you need to think the whole thing through. It makes less sense than it could.

[LightningPoodle]

Wow. Just entered a building in Fallout 4 and in a washing machine is every human bone in the body... 

[Tragedienne of Heavens]

That's awesome! I'd kinda feel tempted to take them and build the skeleton in a settlement. 

 

The other day I quickly entered a room to hide and surprised poor Mr Teddy Bear while he was answering nature's call. Ooops.

Spoiler

[Lynroy: Final Edition]

Wow. Just entered a building in Fallout 4 and in a washing machine is every human bone in the body...

Dienne is doing laundry again I take it.

[LightningPoodle]

That's awesome! I'd kinda feel tempted to take them and build the skeleton in a settlement. 

 

The other day I quickly entered a room to hide and surprised poor Mr Teddy Bear while he was answering nature's call. Ooops.

Spoiler

 

That's brilliant! 

 

There's a building in Concord. A motel of sorts. In one of the rooms, there's a skeleton in a bathtub and 3 other (can't remembered if they were skeletons or mannequins) surrounding it. 2 were carrying machetes and the other was carrying a plunger. 

[Serza]

That's awesome! I'd kinda feel tempted to take them and build the skeleton in a settlement. 

 

The other day I quickly entered a room to hide and surprised poor Mr Teddy Bear while he was answering nature's call. Ooops.

Spoiler

 

Do share your character later...

 

Dienne is doing laundry again I take it.

 

Alright. Thank goodness it's a break. Otherwise, I would've started laughing like an idiot in the middle of a lesson.

[Tragedienne of Heavens]

LOOOOOOOOOL that's so awesome! 

[Tragedienne of Heavens]

Dienne is doing laundry again I take it.

*Gasp* how'd you know? 

 

Do share your character later...

I live to serve

With the husband. Eyes a bit closed, oops (In the screenshot I noticed the wrinkles around the eyes, I'll change that soon -there's a surgeon that can change your face-)

Spoiler

 

Detective mode

Spoiler

 

Also, when it was the 31st of October in game:

Spoiler

 

 

There was a guard complaining about it being all tricks and no treats

[Serza]

Well, glad the lot of you are having fun...

 

I'll have to wait for some awesome until February, and then Holidays 2016, with a potential pit stop in May...

The hype is real, though. (Oh, wait, Nexus and Eden coming to ArmA 3 sometimes during the first months of the new year. Mwahaha.)

[straykat]

That's definitely an improvement over their previous faces. Nice shot, Dienne.

[Serza]

*Gasp* how'd you know? 

 

I live to serve

With the husband. Eyes a bit closed, oops (In the screenshot I noticed the wrinkles around the eyes, I'll change that soon -there's a surgeon that can change your face-)

Spoiler

 

Detective mode

Spoiler

 

Also, when it was the 31st of October in game:

Spoiler

 

 

Also there was a guard complaining about it being all tricks and no treats

 

Hehe. Easy to see similarities with your DAI character. Mind you, though, DAI-Dienne looks better.

[ravenesse]

From what I saw, I'm already in love with the female voice, when she's sarcastic. Hawt

I guess I'll try it in two years. By then the good mods should be out and make me happy

[straykat]

From what I saw, I'm already in love with the female voice, when she's sarcastic. Hawt

I guess I'll try it in two years. By then the good mods should be out and make me happy

 

I haven't even played yet.. but I just knew she'd be good at that. I love Courtenay Taylor.